Bill Nye talks climate change with Tucker Carlson

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: TheBadCabbie
a reply to: yuppa

That's not a very effective rebuttal, in my opinion.

Not if you want a response no it is not,but its effective to show lack of reverence no?

I suppose it is at that.

a reply to: rnaa
How much of the warming is due to mans influence and how much is natural cycles?

That is a meaningless question. It is unquantifiable because there is no way of measuring the effects of all the feedback loops. Scientists can tell you how much of the increase in the CO2 in the atmosphere is due to human activity. They can feed those numbers into models that imitate as much as of the atmospheric interactions as possible and come up with a range of possible futures.

You sound just like Bill Nye.
So we are expected to pay carbon taxes and subsidize green energy projects which in turn put the cost of energy up and drive energy intensive industry to more energy friendly countries without even knowing if man is the primary driver of climate change? Thats just ridiculous.

Attribution of global warming to human beings is NOT based on any real-world, measured, causal chain of evidence, but rather on so called “proof” that consists entirely of computer-model projections that fail miserably in other respects.

That’s the one-sentence version.