To me, the most pertinent and eyebrow raising coincidental (?) element of all this, is the potential psyop element, and particularly the Stubblebine
angle, however tenuous it may be.
This is highly circumstantial of course, but the idea that Stubblebine oversaw the remote viewing program(s) which included a lot more than simply
remote viewing eventually as anyone who has looked into them will know, those programs allegedly died due to poor results, and then there are all
these strange events always associated somehow with hypnosis-like states of consciousness and progressive alteration of subjects' beliefs and
actions... and then Stubblebine marries a pro-hypnotic-regression UFO researcher, with similarly impressive (albeit in a different field obviously,
academic in her case) credentials.
Finding this on the same blog this story was sourced from, apparently I'm not alone in this thinking:
Coincidence? Could well be. And I don't want to make assertions about people or cast assertive aspersions upon them. This is not an assertion or
accusation, just musings.
But I have long suspected a nexus we aren't quite seeing between the intelligence community, hypnosis (and other altered states - anything
facilitating suggestibility or "openness" coupled with intense relaxation and focus,) and these kind of anomalous phenomena and epiphenomna. Most
specifically: the potentially witting use of hypnosis to "create" memories, beliefs, and actions.
And when I say hypnosis, I refer to an induced state of consciousness... including self
induced, such as... for pewp and giggles... the intense
focus conjured by trying to use a Ouija board, or pendulums, or channeling. All things the intelligence community at various points investigated the
There are two possibilities, imho.
1) Various individuals and entities within the IC have at various points throughout history simply been subject to the same kinds of self-delusion,
confabulation, and flights of fancy anyone may be, and some of them just so happen to cross paths with events like the Gulf Breeze 6 or be in their
similar geographic or professional "area" by either sheer coincidence, or shared personal interests. (This would, all things being equal, seem to be
the most probable mundane explanation.)
2) There is something about the focus and concentration-meets-susceptibility intrinsic to these states of consciousness, that allows something we
don't yet know about to happen in particular individuals. Something that has potential intelligence applications we aren't quite able to imagine or
, hypothetically, the latter was happening... UFOs, ghosts, and spiritism would sure make convenient and easily discredited cover stories.
And popular, easily disseminated ones, too. If people laugh, it serves the purpose of isolating the victims/subjects and alienating them. (No pun
intended.) If people start to believe it, it serves the purpose of cover story, since it still isn't the real truth. And if true, there's at least
some chance people wouldn't know it was happening to them at all in that way, because they'd be invested in the false narrative created on a deep and
It could explain the "high strangeness" of a lot of these cases if we're talking about psychotropics, hypnosis, and other states of consciousness.
Induced temporal lobe effects, perhaps. Who knows? There are all sorts of ways you can make someone believe something is happening that isn't... both
exotic and extremely simple, if done well. And isn't that the job of the IC, at least in part? To, in the pursuit of intelligence gathering and
analysis, successfully conceal the truth about what they're doing, through obfuscation, manipulation, concealment, and misdirection?
This has enormous potential implications for everything from events like this, to popular UFO and abduction literature in general, and the narratives
advanced therein. Despite the fact that hypnotic regression is not considered remotely reliable in the psychiatric community - except, sometimes, for
behavior modification, not
for memory reconstruction (behavior modification... should alarm bells be ringing at this prospect in the context of
this story?) - it continues to be employed routinely by abduction "researchers." In the case of someone like David M Jacobs, even over the phone.
(Yes, really. Look it up.)
The question has always been asked: why cover up UFOs, alien contact, etc. if indeed it exists for so many decades? Well what if the answer is
something we don't want to hear, and something SO damning, that concealing it is absolutely critical to national security in a way no one expects?
Namely that it's all psyops and behavior modification (not quite literal "mind control," which may be a misnomer) experiments with convenient, built
in scapegoats, that would incite riots if it could be proved to be occurring on such a scale. (And perhaps worse still, could be used against us by
Hardly a new idea obviously, and I'm not saying this is something I believe is true... but this particular case and the odd connections between
people, places, and times definitely, as I said, raises my eyebrows. It brings this possibility - or something like it - into slightly starker relief,
is all I'm saying. Especially as I've of late been casting a far more skeptical eye toward the somewhat startling and at times downright bizarre
methodology employed by some abduction investigators... and the way so many just accept their ostensible results at face value.
Whether by design, or just emergent behavior... some
sort of alteration of people's perceptions, beliefs, and even core values is at work. What
if "aliens" aren't the ones doing it? What if it's the same entities who have sought to do this since time immemorial: human beings, to other human
Anyway. Just a thought.
edit on 3/23/2017 by AceWombat04 because: Fixed formatting
edit on 3/23/2017 by AceWombat04 because: Ditto