It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Be advised: paranoia (e.g. about wiretaps) is symptomatic of malignant narcissism

page: 1
13
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:01 PM
link   
Ranting by you-should-know-who about such things as wiretapping without any basis whatsoever demonstrates paranoia on the part of the ranter.

Ross Rosenberg at elapsed time of 19:10 in the following Youtube video states that paranoia, along with sociopathy, is symptomatic of malignant narcissism:


Mr. Rosenberg goes on to say emphatically that “narcissists are dangerous!”

Footnote: up until now and for a good long time, many television and Internet personalities have been questioning the sanity or lack thereof of you-should-know-who.

Dear reader: now is the time to start studying the 25th Amendment to the United States Constitution in order to gain a full appreciation of it and its implications.




posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

Wiretapping is a serious allegation and The Clintons played dirty this whole election.
edit on Sat Mar 4 2017 by DontTreadOnMe because: Quote Crash Course



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

LOL

Trump isn't going to publish classified material that proves the Obama Administration was involved.

All that comes a little later.




posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Exactly he's saving all the Top Secret Classified evidence for the Supreme Court Trial Date.
edit on Sat Mar 4 2017 by DontTreadOnMe because: Quote Crash Course



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

It won't be released at all. Just some crumbs for his followers to feed on.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Taggart
a reply to: xuenchen

It won't be released at all. Just some crumbs for his followers to feed on.


Dude hes the President now. You don't make allegations like this unless you have some serious serious hard core evidence to back up your claim.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

LOL

Trump isn't going to publish classified material that proves the Obama Administration was involved.

All that comes a little later.





Exactly he's saving all the Top Secret Classified evidence for the Supreme Court Trial Date.


Not sure you understand how the Supreme Court works there buddy.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

LOL

Trump isn't going to publish classified material that proves the Obama Administration was involved.

All that comes a little later.





Exactly he's saving all the Top Secret Classified evidence for the Supreme Court Trial Date.


Not sure you understand how the Supreme Court works there buddy.


SC takes cases the lower courts won't take.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

LOL

Trump isn't going to publish classified material that proves the Obama Administration was involved.

All that comes a little later.





Exactly he's saving all the Top Secret Classified evidence for the Supreme Court Trial Date.


Not sure you understand how the Supreme Court works there buddy.


SC takes cases the lower courts won't take.


Now I'm not sure you understand the legal system in general.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: Taggart
a reply to: xuenchen

It won't be released at all. Just some crumbs for his followers to feed on.


Dude hes the President now. You don't make allegations like this unless you have some serious serious hard core evidence to back up your claim.


Really?

Sort of like how a President wouldn't make a claim that three million illegal immigrants and dead people combined to lose him the popular vote? Normally a President wouldn't make charges like that without evidence either.

But he did.

He lies. A lot. And he doesn't always worry about the fallout. He wants people looking at Obama instead of him. It's a classic Trump deflection move.

Fall for it at your own risk.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
Ranting by you-should-know-who about such things as wiretapping without any basis whatsoever demonstrates paranoia on the part of the ranter.




So what do you classify someone who ignores blatant evidence of wiretapping, then makes a thread saying there's "no basis whatsoever"?

Delusional? Obtuse? A troll? Can't read?
edit on 4-3-2017 by MysticPearl because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

LOL

Trump isn't going to publish classified material that proves the Obama Administration was involved.

All that comes a little later.





Exactly he's saving all the Top Secret Classified evidence for the Supreme Court Trial Date.


Not sure you understand how the Supreme Court works there buddy.


SC takes cases the lower courts won't take.


Can this be my new signature?



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:24 PM
link   
a reply to: AboveBoard

That was different. Because now he's got a "Supreme Court Trial Date."



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:25 PM
link   
Increasingly, as their world crumbles, the only leftist response is to plug their ears and go "la la la la, I can't here you".

It's like dealing with poorly raised children.
edit on 4-3-2017 by MysticPearl because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: Taggart
a reply to: xuenchen

It won't be released at all. Just some crumbs for his followers to feed on.


Dude hes the President now. You don't make allegations like this unless you have some serious serious hard core evidence to back up your claim.


Just forgetting the constant BS he talks about as fact, he is still up to it now.

He's nearly always wrong when he mentions "facts", he is by definition a BS artist in my opinion.

It's a dangerous precedent when one is the President.

He is always lying on Twitter.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
That was different. Because now he's got a "Supreme Court Trial Date."


Wow. Did they stop teaching civics?

Holy crap.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: MysticPearl
Increasingly, as their world crumbles, the only leftist response is to plug their ears and go "la la la la, I can't here you".

It's like dealing with poorly raised children.


*hear.

Increasingly as their BS is pointed out, the right can only respond with petty personal attacks rather than stick to fact based discussion.

And here I thought emotional responses were supposed to just be a leftist thing



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Later after he goes to jail.... for that would be illegal to do.

IF Trump really had proof of this then the thing top do is leak it to one of his conservative right-wing goons

But of course its a falsehood from Trumps wire tapped brain



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Shamrock6
That was different. Because now he's got a "Supreme Court Trial Date."


Wow. Did they stop teaching civics?

Holy crap.


Maybe he/she/zir just hasn't hit that grade level yet? I dunno man.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
Maybe he/she/zir just hasn't hit that grade level yet? I dunno man.


I would love to be around when they try to empanel a jury for this Supreme Court trial.




top topics



 
13
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join