It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wiretapping Trump residence.

page: 97
158
<< 94  95  96    98  99  100 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:27 AM
link   
Former Attorney General Mukasey agrees with Trump -- there likely WAS surveillance!


“I think he’s right in that there was surveillance and that it was conducted at the behest of the attorney general — at the Justice Department,” Mukasey told ABC’s “This Week.”

Trump on Saturday accused Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in New York City just before the November election.


The Hill

Of course, at this point, the double standard is beyond doubt: if this had been a Repub' Administration wiretapping a leftist presidential candidate the liberal media would be screaming from the rooftops!

Remember how fast the IRS targeting of conservative groups (undoubtedly ordered by Obama!) went away? The issue is still unresolved on many levels.

I hope the majority of Americans who are otherwise politically ambivalent begin to understand the truth: these leftists want to drag this exceptional nation down to the level of the third world socialist banana republics they so greatly admire.


edit on 5-3-2017 by SBMcG because: Bill Clinton's wife lost the popular vote too!




posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite




Removing trump's name from the warrant so that it will get approved = perjury, unless the aims of the warrant changed (maybe they did, IDK) but from what we know now (little) it doesn't seem like they did.
I would think that a competent legal adviser would have known that it wouldn't have passed with DT name on it .So I am thinking that the Judge may have not been as controlled as the O team would of liked and refused to stamp it ...The past paper trail would have been taken care of by the new HRC team and could have refused to release this important info as fact ....DT case to move ahead will have access to the hard facts of the original trajectory of the investigation . They (O team) are in a darned if they do and darned if they don't situation ....It will probably just become a public optics situation from hear on out .

Either way Trump will probably win by silencing the MSM and put a big red flag over Obama ...



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

I think you accuse others of insults where none exist but in your own mind.

The only thing you have outed is your sense of your own importance.

Several of you have an unhealthy obsession with my posts. I'd be honored if it weren't so creepy.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:28 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Oh yes. This was needed alright. It's called deflection. Look here not there.


Seeing a statement that trump has now asked congress to investigate wiretapping claims.

He will be sorry. But it gives h I s wild claim some weight.




But for the record if a FISA warrant was issued it means that a federal judge thought there was evidence of a crime to be investigated.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:29 AM
link   

n a July 2013 interview, Senator and privacy advocate Ron Wyden described the FISC warrant process as "the most one-sided legal process in the United States". "I don't know of any other legal system or court that really doesn't highlight anything except one point of view", he said. Later in the interview he said Congress should seek to "diversify some of the thinking on the court".[26]


Source

Basically put.

ALL it took is a single LEFT WING NUTTER to get the FISA warrant on Trump.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Your forgot to mention Benghazi - I didn't.

As far as Trump on drugs - well that's my opinion based on my experience of how others I have come across in my lifetime when taking the up and down ride hard prescription drugs (not illegal) provide and how they effect their personalities and behavior. Trump is a classic.

Looking forward to the day I no longer have to listen to his BS on the news, knowing it will at least be the end of his term or speculating at his age his life expiration would be the last reason is far from wishing someones death.

You're free to interpret my words how you like, but I disagree with your twist that I wish his life or anyone else for that matter to end.

The rest I have covered in my last post.



edit on 3/5/17 by verylowfrequency because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
Or, working a case that involves possible collusion between a candidate for president and a foreign government to influence the outcome of the election


Hillary collected a billion dollars in campaign contributions bribes during her run.

What do you call that?

Anyway ... Obozo tapped The Don's comms ... and someone from Obozo's team (if not the Obozo himself) is gonna go to jail.

Wiretapping illegally ... is illegal. I can't wait for the finger-pointing to start. Throw this bone to Trey Gowdy and throw a bag of popcorn into the microwave. It's gonna be good.


edit on 532017 by Snarl because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Oh yes. This was needed alright. It's called deflection. Look here not there.


Seeing a statement that trump has now asked congress to investigate wiretapping claims.

He will be sorry. But it gives h I s wild claim some weight.




But for the record if a FISA warrant was issued it means that a federal judge thought there was evidence of a crime to be investigated.


Glad you finally caught up. Is your news feed delayed by 8 hrs????



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Grambler

I think you accuse others of insults where none exist but in your own mind.

The only thing you have outed is your sense of your own importance.

Several of you have an unhealthy obsession with my posts. I'd be honored if it weren't so creepy.


So it is your claim that you didn't mean the following as an insult?


all they want is another investigation (or ten) so that they can confirm their beliefs that that lying, Muslim, Kenyan, traitor Obama done spied on that Good and Honest, Christian Family Man Donald Trump.


Wow, you are digging a deeper and deeper hole.

The only obsession I have is with pointing out hypocrisy. I am sorry that you seem to be one of the worst offenders.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Grambler

We do not spy on our own. We do have inalienable rights.


Unalienable rights do not include colluding with foreign government's to undermine our free elections.

He is imploding on the Launchpad.


Considering they wiretapped him and found nothing I would say you are right, it doesn't, and he didn't, and they kept the wiretaps going.


They did not wiretap him?

"They" wiretapped Russian FSB Operatives coordinating an active campaign to interfere with the free elections of the Untied States.

If those wire-taps picked up Donald Trump or his associates strategizing to do the same, then that is something I would very much like Donald Trump to expound upon and explain.

As far as "finding nothing"...The FBI has refused to publicly say what you are claiming..the reason being that they do not comment on ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS..

We are now at 6 plus campaign advisors, cabinet appointees, senior white house advisors that have had various contact with various Senior Russian Operatives...And LIED ABOUT it...

Like with Nixon...It is the LIES and COVER-UP that raises red flags....

Sure...there could be rational and reasonable explanations that Team Trump did everything they did, meeting over and over with the Russians...But it is the repeated LIES and COVER-UP that has the American People looking for answers and the intelligence community racing toward a full accounting of the truth.

As investigators often say...When there is a broad and repeated effort to conceal, cover-up and lie about an activity...The smoke is the fire. It aint rocket science.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:33 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Loretta Lynch did take action by using trigger words,

"blood in the street"

"Some may even die"

Was that marching orders in response to Trump, we'll see soon enough.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:33 AM
link   
So thousands of posts & 97 pages later we still have no proof that "Obama wiretapped Trump"...


Granted I dodged the last 40 odd pages but I'm guessing by the general tone of the last few that nothing substantial has come about and Trump hasn't gone further on the record about this...



Can you smell that...?


Sniff sniff...


Smells like bullsh*t.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Dfairlite



...

Either way Trump will probably win by silencing the MSM and put a big red flag over Obama ...


I have watched candidate and now President Trump for bout 20 months now. He has an uncanny almost preternatural ability to be several days ahead of his rivals and/or the news cycle. I have rarely seen him even speculate about something unless there were some basis in reality.

I have no doubt Congress is going to investigate this -- they pretty much have to. My gut tells me this is going to lead to some Very Dark Places for Obama and the already-imploding American Left.
edit on 5-3-2017 by SBMcG because: Obama has no legacy other than failure.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96


Instead, the experts discovered that the Trump Organization had set up an email server that only performed one function: irregularly pinging a single email server located at Alfa Bank — one of Russia’s biggest banks, which has close connections to the Russian and Ukrainian political elite. Both servers were set up to reject connections from third-party servers, and neither was active outside of Moscow and New York business hours.
......
When Alfa Bank was questioned about its Trump-oriented server, that server vanished, only to be immediately replaced by another that performed the same function, Slate reported.
www.salon.com...



The conversation between the Trump and Alfa servers appeared to follow the contours of political happenings in the United States. “At election-related moments, the traffic peaked,” according to Camp. There were considerably more DNS lookups, for instance, during the two conventions.


www.slate.com...


That doesn't look like nothing to me! It looks damning!



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Phoenix

She did, I took note. Now she becomes the martyr.

Obama will thrown someone under, whatever it takes
to protect his legacy.

Next thing you will see is the race card again.

Wash, rinse, repeat.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: introvert


I don't care what the media is doing. I can't engage with them in a conversation.


Ok, so then would you say that those on ATS rushing to judgement about Rusian hacking is just as bad?


I think it's wrong for anyone to speak in concrete absolutes when they do not have all of the information.

The only thing I am sure of at this point, is that it is being speculated that Trump may have inadvertently set himself up for potential problems, because he may have revealed classified info with his tweet.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777

He didn't provide any proof. He provided his opinion.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:37 AM
link   
Question is, was Obama collecting intel on Trump's campaign strategies and tactics? The FISA was only for the Russian bank, not for gathering campaign intel to help Hillary Clinton.



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:38 AM
link   
a reply to: PlayerWon

I'm rich. Not boasting but I have a six figure bank account and a 2016 Lincoln in my driveway.
Just sayin...



posted on Mar, 5 2017 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Berns23
Question is, was Obama collecting intel on Trump's campaign strategies and tactics? The FISA was only for the Russian bank, not for gathering campaign intel to help Hillary Clinton.


Another question is ... why do you think that was happening?




top topics



 
158
<< 94  95  96    98  99  100 >>

log in

join