It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wiretapping Trump residence.

page: 386
158
<< 383  384  385    387  388  389 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:02 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG

I just noted Mr. Napolitano was missing.

I wondered why. As a Fox News devotee, I thought you might have intel.

Sorry.

Also, again, the world is not the simplistic checker-board you think it is, wingnut.





posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: SBMcG

I just noted Mr. Napolitano was missing.

I wondered why. As a Fox News devotee, I thought you might have intel.

Sorry.

Also, again, the world is not the simplistic checker-board you think it is, wingnut.



"Wingnut"...?

Really?

I swear to Christ, you leftists continue to be your own worst enemies.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Phage
What the hell was he talking about yesterday then?


That's a great question.

I don't think anyone really knows. As far as I'm concerned, he has tainted any valuable evidence by leaving bi-partisan committee members out of the equation before he alerted the White House.


You folks keep saying this---I suppose in hopes someone will believe it---but that supposes that the members of the committee had no access to his presser. My goodness, I thought they all had their e-gadgets. He briefed them at the same time he briefed the public. Then he went to the White House. How hard is that to understand? It's that transparency thing that the public has been requesting for decades now. It is no different from law enforcement coming out with names and associations when a very public crime has been committed. How on earth has that "tainted" any evidence? Are the letters and numbers on the pages now scrambled because he revealed the fact that he has seen evidence? There is nothing logical in that statement, just reaching for the smallest thing to grasp onto while the ship continues to the bottom of the sea.
edit on 23-3-2017 by diggindirt because: correction



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:33 PM
link   
a reply to: diggindirt




but that supposes that the members of the committee had no access to his presser.

He provided no real information in his press conference. Turns out, it's not clear that he actually had any.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG




I don't see anything new there.

Really? After watching him yesterday you didn't have the impression that he had seen the intelligence information he was talking about? You didn't have the impression that transition officials had been surveilled?

edit on 3/23/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:38 PM
link   
FYI -- nothing new from Nunes on Hannity tonight re: Barrygate.

He has been consistently saying the same thing for 2 days now.

I'm waiting for the "smoking gun" James Rosen claims is already in the hands of the House Intel' Committee.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:40 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG




I'm waiting for the "smoking gun" James Rosen claims is already in the hands of the House Intel' Committee.


You'll be waiting for the investigation to conclude then.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SBMcG




I don't see anything new there.

Really? After watching him yesterday you didn't have the impression that he had seen the intelligence information he was talking about? You didn't have the impression that transition officials had been surveilled?


He clearly said that he had seen a REPORT not the actual documents. That was never in question.

What's your point?
edit on 23-3-2017 by SBMcG because: The Deep State IS the Alt-Left.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SBMcG




I'm waiting for the "smoking gun" James Rosen claims is already in the hands of the House Intel' Committee.


You'll be waiting for the investigation to conclude then.


What "investigation"?

There isn't one yet.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:42 PM
link   
Rumors that Napolitano started getting death threats after outing GCHQ.

That's why he's off Fox.

In deep hiding.

Not sure if true.

Sure possible.




posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:45 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG



Yeah, so this information was legally brought to be by sources who thought that we should know it. And it was, it had, there were no references whatsoever in everything that I read, and it was dozens, let’s just say, let’s leave it at that, dozens of reports, and there was no mention of Russia.


What is you think he meant when he said "dozens of reports?"
edit on 3/23/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG


What "investigation"?
What do you think Nunes' committee is doing?
What do you think the FBI is doing?

edit on 3/23/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SBMcG



Yeah, so this information was legally brought to be by sources who thought that we should know it. And it was, it had, there were no references whatsoever in everything that I read, and it was dozens, let’s just say, let’s leave it at that, dozens of reports, and there was no mention of Russia.


What is you think he meant when he said "dozens of reports?"


I have no idea.

What do you think he meant?



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SBMcG


What "investigation"?
What do you think Nunes' committee is doing?
What do you think the FBI is doing?


No idea about the FBI -- according to Nunes yesterday they're not cooperating.

As for Congress, if you want to call this preliminary phase of gathering information an "investigation", that's fine.

Again, what's your point?



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG



What do you think he meant?

I thought he meant that he had read "dozens of reports."



As for Congress, if you want to call this preliminary phase of gathering information an "investigation", that's fine.
That's what Nunes called it on Monday. When he said there was no evidence of Trump being wiretapped.

edit on 3/23/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SBMcG

I thought he meant that he had read "dozens of reports."


Mmmmkay, I still don't get the significance.

He read a report, or he read dozens of reports. Are you really finding that much relevance is that kind of minutia?

If so, why?



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SBMcG

That's what Nunes called it on Monday. When he said there was no evidence of Trump being wiretapped.


He didn't have all the information on Monday.

Or hadn't read it.

Again, total minutia.

I really don't see the relevance to the overall narrative that the Obama Regime wiretapped Team Trump.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 10:06 PM
link   
Davy Jones' Locker; Yo-ho-ho! t'is a world of secrets

www.foxnews.com...

freebeacon.com...



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: diggindirt

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Phage
What the hell was he talking about yesterday then?


That's a great question.

I don't think anyone really knows. As far as I'm concerned, he has tainted any valuable evidence by leaving bi-partisan committee members out of the equation before he alerted the White House.


You folks keep saying this---


I'm pretty certain it's the first and only time I've said this.

And in case you're interested, I'm not "folks" I'm only one folk.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 11:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: SBMcG

I just noted Mr. Napolitano was missing.

I wondered why. As a Fox News devotee, I thought you might have intel.

Sorry.

Also, again, the world is not the simplistic checker-board you think it is, wingnut.



"Wingnut"...?

Really?

I swear to Christ, you leftists continue to be your own worst enemies.


Wingnut is better than cockroach.

At least, theoretically.

That said, since you insist on being rude and repeatedly calling me something that I'm not, after I've informed you differently, you're nothing but a mouthy hypocrite. Don't cry anymore about being attacked, wingnut; it falls on deaf ears.



new topics

top topics



 
158
<< 383  384  385    387  388  389 >>

log in

join