It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wiretapping Trump residence.

page: 328
158
<< 325  326  327    329  330  331 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 10:53 AM
link   


Gowdy "Did you brief Obama on Flynn?" Comey: "Not going to answer that."

That is the answer needed.
The fact that Comey won't answer is very curious.




posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: UKTruth

your post being innocent of such drama of course


That's ok I can do drama. Hey I can sing too if we want to put this to music.
🎶One.... singular sensation....



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:06 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Wow that's a chasm leap of epic proportion Evel Knievel. Check your struts.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:11 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

The investigation of the Russians began then. Do try to keep up. If there's a test I'm not letting you copy my paper.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Is that not the quote?



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:13 AM
link   
Side bar
Possible other surveillance activities were used on trump



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:14 AM
link   
I love the information coming out even if Comey can't confirm it.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

If "the investigation" was on "russian" hacking that would have begun after the podesta emails were released no?

Clearly comey stated the investigation began in july of 16



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

The D.C. leaks were way ahead of Wikileaks. They just didn't have a user friendly format. June 2016 I believe.
And the hack was first of the DNC not John podesta.
But just how did Roger Stone know in advance that podesta would be hacked.
Those weren't released until Oct 16
edit on 3202017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

He said do not draw conclusions from what I cannot confirm. So the first thing you do is....



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

The hack happened. No one denies it but a few die hard conspiracy theorists so please stop dragging the discussion into your rabbit hole ok.
As far as who leaked to the media it could be the FBI or even trumps people who's motives it turned out were not served.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:41 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme




The hack happened.

I have read a few reports of the info leaked by Mr Rich.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

The hack happened. No one denies it but a few die hard conspiracy theorists so please stop dragging the discussion into your rabbit hole ok.
As far as who leaked to the media it could be the FBI or even trumps people who's motives it turned out were not served.


There were leaks prior to 1/20/2017

Who are those?



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

The D.C. leaks were way ahead of Wikileaks. They just didn't have a user friendly format. June 2016 I believe.
And the hack was first of the DNC not John podesta.
But just how did Roger Stone know in advance that podesta would be hacked.
Those weren't released until Oct 16


DId Stone know? Or is it insinuated because there isn't enough detail?

Maybe Stone was referring to knowing about Podesta doing his own shady backroom Russian deals?



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 11:52 AM
link   
This has become the follow up to the Racheal Maddow show. A chance to spread propaganda.
We're now on Tillerson doing an oil deal and hearing about his motorbike rides.

Started off being very informative, but descending.
edit on 20/3/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 12:03 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Yep. Complete sham/propaganda and you don't have the need to know. Rogers is a disappointment after all. Comey smug as usual.

Funny the things both of them can let be insinuated and hang and the things they are willing to confirm and back each other up on.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: UKTruth

Yep. Complete sham/propaganda and you don't have the need to know. Rogers is a disappointment after all. Comey smug as usual.

Funny the things both of them can let be insinuated and hang and the things they are willing to confirm and back each other up on.


Well we kind of suspected that their was an investigation into Trump associates - as it had been reported - and now it is confirmed. Which means , unless the FBI and the NSA were not using the tools they have, that they were indeed spying on the Trump campaign.

Thus far there is no evidence of any collusion.

...Trump has just tweeted that Comey refused to confirm he briefed Obama on Michael Flynn.... if Comey was briefing Obama on the Trump campaign, then Obama was spying on them.

There is no proof of Obama ordering a wire tap though.

The only crime identified at this point is the illegal leaking of information.

edit on 20/3/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 12:29 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth





posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 12:34 PM
link   
So Donald Rumsfeld had it down many years ago ....We just don't know that we don't know ....X was absolutely spot on about it being too secret to say .



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 12:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1 ....X was absolutely spot on about it being too secret to say .


Yep, spot on.
I think this is why Trumps tweets are factual.

Perhaps no one will ever be able to "prove" he was not "tapped".



new topics

top topics



 
158
<< 325  326  327    329  330  331 >>

log in

join