It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wiretapping Trump residence.

page: 276
158
<< 273  274  275    277  278  279 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra


People must demand the DNC turn over the "hacked server" to the FBI for analysis.


Did I just hear that correctly????
A person under investigation for breaching security systems was employed by Wassermann Schultz and had access to her email passwords?
How has this not been reported? are we sure the guy in the video has his facts straight?

edit on 11/3/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:08 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

The more this gets looked into the more Democrats are walking back their claims.

Senate Democrat Who Claimed Hard Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion: Uh, Never Mind

Several video links contained.



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Apparently Obama also wiretapped Kuscinich.



Sara Carter states here she is 100% certain that there were two warrants, one on the Russian Ambassador (a FISA warrant) and one separate warrant regarding the Trump server. I wonder why the rest of the media has not reached out to her for more information?
edit on 11/3/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:11 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

The same reason a Democrat on the intelligence committee just stated that if this becomes to "political" Democrats will withdraw from the hearings.

They bought into the Russia Trump BS hook line and sinker and now are seeing they were wrong. I want to know why Democrats never turned over the hacked server to the FBI to start with. What are they afraid the FBI would find... or not find?



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: UKTruth

The more this gets looked into the more Democrats are walking back their claims.

Senate Democrat Who Claimed Hard Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion: Uh, Never Mind

Several video links contained.


Yes I saw Coons have to walk back his statement and apologise for his blatant propaganda... I think there are quite a few nervous people at the moment. Those that have leaked information are going to be found, and if there were wiretaps we are going to hear about them, who ordered them, and who knew.



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: UKTruth

The same reason a Democrat on the intelligence committee just stated that if this becomes to "political" Democrats will withdraw from the hearings.

They bought into the Russia Trump BS hook line and sinker and now are seeing they were wrong. I want to know why Democrats never turned over the hacked server to the FBI to start with. What are they afraid the FBI would find... or not find?


Poor Democrats may just have pushed the Russian propaganda a bit too far... it's beginning to look uncomfortable for them. Shame.



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

You want to catch up on what has not been on the MSM but is documented then www.youtube.com... have at it ....you will be amazed eta this is his latest

edit on 11-3-2017 by the2ofusr1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:18 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:46 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I seen that in the news this morning I am surprise that is nothing here in ATS supposedly the final review of the data collected on the investigation of the Russia hack didn't have any links of Trump.

I don't see to find anything around but what it was in the news this morning.



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 07:58 PM
link   
What is the CNN braking news that Trump fire US Attorney Preet Bharara to get back at Schumer.

I read that in the news also.



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 08:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: marg6043
What is the CNN braking news that Trump fire US Attorney Preet Bharara to get back at Schumer.

I read that in the news also.


He refused to resign at the request of the AG.




posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Gryphon66

So when someone makes a general statement against Democrats you have issues with it however when someone anonymous makes a general statement you try your damnedest to attribute it to Comey.

You are "assuming" something he never said that never came out of his mouth and something thats never been confirmed by Comey, the FBI nor the DOJ.

again

Why do I think its BS?
* - The FBI is not the only agency that can obtain a FISA warrant.
* - The FBI cant comment on ongoing investigations.
* - FISA and the investigations around it are classified 9 ways from Sunday.
* - Trump never claimed the FBI was behind it.
* - The FBI cant comment on ongoing investigations being conducted by another title 3 agency.


I don't have a problem with statements against Democrats ... as long as they are true statements. Assigning "corruption" to everyone who might qualify as "left" in their politics is frankly ... just stupid.

Many Democrats are really independents who happen to vote a certain way. Many are really old style Republicans who are appalled at what their party became. Many Democrats are truly hardcore socialists, leftists, or other extremists.

In short, Democrats are as varied as any other group, yet, as a rhetorical device, many of you act like they are all the same.

Some of you take EVERYTHING and make it about party or political belief. You're fine with sweeping statements about "leftists" or "progressives" but let someone suggest that the Westboro Baptist Church or some White Supremacist group or radical Tea Party groups is indicative of all Republicans? Watch the whining and crying fly!

You are "assuming" that what was reported DIDN'T come out of his mouth. Why is that any more asinine than assuming that media reports (which, by and large are factual regardless of the current rhetoric by some) aren't true?

I notice above you post several amateur "broadcasters" from Youtube. Apparently, you believe everything they say, no matter how unsubstantiated. Why? Because it agrees with your beliefs.

You watched the ridiculous mental gymnastics required today to "discredit" CNN over the reporting on Comey's request to the DOJ. Splitting down to absurd definitions of words ... yet I'm sure, based on your comments, that all made perfect sense to you.

Why don't you guys apply that mind-numbing ludicrous level of analysis to these Youtubers you keep posting as Gospel, eh?

Because it matches with your political beliefs. Pure and simple.

And then you hypocritically accuse others of the same thing.

/shrug
edit on 11-3-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Because its being reported he said it when we have absolutely nothing to corroborate that other than "American sources".

the only hypocrisy is displayed by you.
edit on 11-3-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 09:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Forget Trump for a moment.

Does it not worry you in the least bit that Kucinich, who was a Democrat and a real liberal in my opinion, someone who as actually been a voice against war mongering from Republicans, and Democrats was wiretapped in 2011?


I was wiretapped in 2011 after taking a phone call in my congressional office from a foreign leader.

That a secret recording had been made of this call was revealed to me by the Washington Times in 2015, a full two years after I left office.

The newspaper’s investigative reporters called me, saying they had obtained a tape of a sensitive telephone conversation that they wanted me to verify.

When I met them at a Chinese restaurant in Washington, they played back audio of a call I had taken in my D.C. congressional office four years earlier.

The call had been from Saif el-Islam Qaddafi, a high-ranking official in Libya’s government and a son of the country’s ruler, Moammar Qaddafi.

At the time I was leading efforts in the House to challenge the Obama administration’s war against Libya. The Qaddafi government reached out to me because its appeals to the White House and the State Department to forestall the escalating aggression had gone unanswered.


www.foxnews.com...

Ao a congressman that was one of the only voices against Obama's regime changing war in Libya had his phone wiretapped.

Will you admit this is an egregious abuse of power by Obama administration?



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 09:24 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Ok, I have no been able to do too much in the last two days, been staying in hotels for the Taco Tequila festival.

I be back home tomorrow.



I hate having to just stop for a minute to get news and see what is going on ATS.



posted on Mar, 11 2017 @ 11:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Gryphon66

Because its being reported he said it when we have absolutely nothing to corroborate that other than "American sources".

.


You mean, kinda like Trump tweeting about wiretaps that he has yet to provide evidence of? That kind of corroboration? Or did you mean some other kind?



posted on Mar, 12 2017 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra




The same reason a Democrat on the intelligence committee just stated that if this becomes to "political" Democrats will withdraw from the hearings.

Nice
Do they post here?



posted on Mar, 12 2017 @ 08:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

That is the 4th time that info has been posted in this thread.
None of them will touch it as it does not suit their agenda.
Seems they have no problem with the former potus' admin using the kgb playbook.



posted on Mar, 12 2017 @ 08:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Gryphon66

Because its being reported he said it when we have absolutely nothing to corroborate that other than "American sources".

.


You mean, kinda like Trump tweeting about wiretaps that he has yet to provide evidence of? That kind of corroboration? Or did you mean some other kind?


No, it's the same kind. So, you must believe Trump then, right?




top topics



 
158
<< 273  274  275    277  278  279 >>

log in

join