It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wiretapping Trump residence.

page: 247
158
<< 244  245  246    248  249  250 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:32 PM
link   
Its a very interesting fake news report because they say that only a few people could have known ....Hillary was not one of them but ........I am loving this

edit on 8-3-2017 by the2ofusr1 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra


"Trump aides were caught talking to Russian agents, and those conversations were captured because the intelligence community regularly taps the phone lines of those Russian agents," Mook said.

He said the real question that needs to be asked is why were Trump aides talking to Russia so much.

Mook added that the Clinton campaign was informed by the intelligence community that wiretaps of Russian agents did in fact take place.


insider.foxnews.com...

So Mook admits that the russians were wiretapped and it picked up people on Trumps team, and the IC community told the Hillary campaign about it!!!!

This is huge! A couple of point to remember.

1. DNI clapper was there at this time and would have heard all of the wiretapped conversations, and he says there is zero evidence of any wrong doing.

2. Despite this, the intelligence community was sharing details of an investigation into Hillaries political opponent with her campaign.

3. The campaign was still going strong. Remember Hillary had that weird statement about a computer pinging in Trump tower? She could have claimed that she just heard this news form other sources. But that excuse won't fly now! Because we know the IC were giving Hillarys campaign information into an investigation into her political opponent.

She then starts telling the public details of this investigation! This is unbelievable?

Now some may say the taps weren't on Trumps people, but on the russians. But keep in mind Clapper says there was no evidence of wrong doing. Therefore they had no right to spread info to anyone about this, let alone Trumps political opponent!

I can't believe people will be willing to look the other way on this.

Imagine if the FBI was telling Trumps campaign classified information into the investigation on Hillarys email scandal as it was occuring. And then, Trump was going on tv telling people the details of that investigation!

The democrats would have went insane! hell, the flipped out when copmey just announced to the public that they were reopening the investigation! Imagine the outrage had he gave Trump intel into that investigation!



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

Mook was Clintons campaign chief and not a member of the FBI, NSA, CIA or any law enforcement group so he should not have known about the wiretaps either.

Clapper, DNI, stated numerous times, most recently this last Sunday, there is no evidence linking Trump / his campaign / associates to Russia. It sounds like they don't "and never did know anything but a theory made by someone else but made those accusations based off that" for political purposes in order to defraud the American public in order for Clinton to win an election..



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

None of that information is relevant in whether or not Obama Wiretapped Trump though.

This thread isn't about Hillary or her possible crimes. It's about Obama wiretapping Trump.



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
Now some may say the taps weren't on Trumps people, but on the russians. But keep in mind Clapper says there was no evidence of wrong doing. Therefore they had no right to spread info to anyone about this, let alone Trumps political opponent!


Here is my issue with the above.

Its already been stated by both sides that we monitor the Russian Ambassador as a matter of course via our secret services (and Russia does the same).

Knowing that please explain the need for a FISA warrant in order to monitor a Russian we already monitor as a matter of course. The same holds, presumably, for any Russian national we have identified and linked to Russian secret services / russian government.



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I started a new thread on this here.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thanks for bringing it to light.



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   
Who in the hell was giving Hillary, Moot, and Gawd-knows-who-else this information?!!!

Was it FBI...CIA...DNI...NSA...LORETTA LYNCH? BARACK OBAMA? VALERIE JARRETT?

Inquiring minds want to know. Maybe it was the Washington Post. For some reason, they have access to top secret information and have no qualms about putting it out there. Remember 2013:


On August 29, 2013 the Washington Post published the summary of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence's multivolume FY 2013 Congressional Budget Justification, the U.S. intelligence community's top-secret "black budget."[
wikipedia
edit on 8-3-2017 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
Its a very interesting fake news report because they say that only a few people could have known ....Hillary was not one of them but ........I am loving this



That's the thing, no one says there were no tapps.

They are all just playing dumb.




posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Xcathdra

None of that information is relevant in whether or not Obama Wiretapped Trump though.

This thread isn't about Hillary or her possible crimes. It's about Obama wiretapping Trump.


Translation - you tried to dismiss the secret service agent and his info and when you got called out with the evidence Mook knew now its not relevant.

The information is very relevant. FISA warrants are classified and so are the investigations they are linked to, mainly because it deals with foreign surveillance / intelligence gathering operations.

Why would Mook know about it?
Why would Clinton know about it (we know she did by her tweet on Oct 31st 2016 when she "broke the news" on twitter about the server, Trump and its "link to Russia".

Wanna rethink your statement about their relevancy and take another swing?



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Xcathdra

None of that information is relevant in whether or not Obama Wiretapped Trump though.

This thread isn't about Hillary or her possible crimes. It's about Obama wiretapping Trump.


But this has almost nothing to do with any wrong doing by Hillary. It has to do with Obamas administrations intelligence people giving information to Hillarys campaign about an on going investigation into her political opponent.

This is bad enough, but while this was happening, the head of the NSA admits they had no evidence of any wrong doing by Trump or his team.

This isn't Hillary broke the law, its saying the Obama administration gave out classified information about the investigation into Trump to his political opponent knowing full well they had no info he had done anything wrong, all to give Hillary a chance to use that info to help her win the investigation.

This is an unbelievable level of corruption by the Obama administration.



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

What???

Look. As it stands the Intel guys are saying there were no warrants given for wiretapping Trump.

Trump says that Obama tapped him though.

So that is step one. Finding out who's right.

If someone produces a warrant to tap Trump then Trump is right. If not, he's lying.

That is the first step to this. All the theories about who did what and why don't matter until we find out if it ever even happened to begin with.

Either Trump or the entire Intel Service under Obama will have to answer for themselves for this at some point.



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 08:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

this is far beyond watergate
this is an attempt at a coup



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

That is all very interesting and might make for another good thread but all I'm wating for is to answer who is lying here about this one thing.

Is Trump or the entire Inel wing of the Obama Admin.



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 09:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Grambler

this is far beyond watergate
this is an attempt at a coup


This is sedition, subversiveness, and if enough details are revealed, we may have the T word and even the E word.



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 09:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Xcathdra

What???

Look. As it stands the Intel guys are saying there were no warrants given for wiretapping Trump.

Trump says that Obama tapped him though.

So that is step one. Finding out who's right.

If someone produces a warrant to tap Trump then Trump is right. If not, he's lying.

That is the first step to this. All the theories about who did what and why don't matter until we find out if it ever even happened to begin with.

Either Trump or the entire Intel Service under Obama will have to answer for themselves for this at some point.




He was Tapped!

Does it matter if they had a warrant?

I'd say they better have had one. Even if it was legal, who was the target of the warrant?!

They cannot tap citizens and releasing any of it is a felony under a FISA.

So is warrantless tapping.

There are 2 choices.

Which is it?




posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 09:06 PM
link   
The title of the OP says the Trump residence may have been wiretapped, but remember, it's more than that. The Trump Tower was where Donald Trump, the presidential candidate, had his Campaign Headquarters.

This is going very deep now. Spying on an even deeper level than Watergate!!



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 09:06 PM
link   
For some reason the biggest thread and the most active thread is out of the top spot on the front page and moved down to number 6 position ...
edit on 8-3-2017 by the2ofusr1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Right. I agree, that if they Tapped him at all then they had better of had a warrant or they did it against the law right from the start.

But the intel community has said they didn't get a warrant at all. Never happened.

So that is what I'm waiting to find out. Both sides have made their stand and one will be found to be lying. That is step one and the only one I'm really waiting to find out.



posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 09:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
For some reason the biggest thread and the most active thread is out of the top spot on the front page and moved down to umber 6 position ...



Do I really have to say it?

RUSSIANS!





posted on Mar, 8 2017 @ 09:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Right. I agree, that if they Tapped him at all then they had better of had a warrant or they did it against the law right from the start.

But the intel community has said they didn't get a warrant at all. Never happened.

So that is what I'm waiting to find out. Both sides have made their stand and one will be found to be lying. That is step one and the only one I'm really waiting to find out.










top topics



 
158
<< 244  245  246    248  249  250 >>

log in

join