It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wiretapping Trump residence.

page: 177
158
<< 174  175  176    178  179  180 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:47 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96




To disparage posters.
I am just taking notes of posters that have a hard time understanding laws and the legalese ,Not that its not a challenge because its something that takes time . I would suggest though that they might want to stay clear of power tools and for gods sake don't buy a piece of IKEA furniture ....just sayin




posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: marg6043

"elements of that story"

"might have been"

"could be"

Classic disinfo Marg. Really? You're falling for that?


More democratic / Martha radditz talking points.


One more step toward outright dishonesty for you.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

the DNI, FBI and CIA all concluded there was no collusion between Trump, his campaign, surrogates and Russia.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Non denial, denial, for now is working but once the investigation starts is over baby. over.



I am going to steal you avatar.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   
The fact he is the president of the United States and he does NOT have access to all of the information that he needs it ludicrous. It is almost as if they are not completed 'removing' all of the evidence of any wrongdoing and it is taking longer than expected because they thought the queen would be in office.

This transition reminds me of Clinton-Bush. What happened 9 months later? 9/11. It was proven that intelligence shortcomings and not allowing the sharing of information led to them not being caught prior. It was a cluster when it occurred.

Right now, in my eyes, the US does not have a leader not because it does not have one who wants the job but it has one who does not want to leave the job.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: the2ofusr1

Take your names, friend. Be careful of participating in forum gang activity though.

(That's against T&C)
edit on 6-3-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
The fact he is the president of the United States and he does NOT have access to all of the information that he needs it ludicrous. It is almost as if they are not completed 'removing' all of the evidence of any wrongdoing and it is taking longer than expected because they thought the queen would be in office.

This transition reminds me of Clinton-Bush. What happened 9 months later? 9/11. It was proven that intelligence shortcomings and not allowing the sharing of information led to them not being caught prior. It was a cluster when it occurred.

Right now, in my eyes, the US does not have a leader not because it does not have one who wants the job but it has one who does not want to leave the job.



Maybe he should have thought of that on Friday ...

/shrug



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: marg6043

"elements of that story"

"might have been"

"could be"

Classic disinfo Marg. Really? You're falling for that?


More democratic / Martha radditz talking points.


One more step toward outright dishonesty for you.


and nothing more than outright lies from you.

Might have been, if, etc are being used to attack the rights position because apparently only the left can use unnamed sources or hypothetical.

By all means though continue to lie to us... It seems thats all you and a few others in this thread are capable of. After worshiping Obama for 8 years and believing his lies hook line and sinker its not a surprise.

But dont take my word for it.. Ask the Doctor you can keep.
edit on 6-3-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:50 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Actually they say there never were any warrants issued.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Gryphon66

Non denial, denial, for now is working but once the investigation starts is over baby. over.



I am going to steal you avatar.


LOL.

Okay Marg. We'll see.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Get ready for the big reveal ...

Whose phone was being tapped that produced those records?

Think before you answer.


Going by the Associated Press standard.

Over 100 people.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Actually they say there never were any warrants issued.


Who are 'they'



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

What ever foxy what ever.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: neo96




To disparage posters.
I am just taking notes of posters that have a hard time understanding laws and the legalese ,Not that its not a challenge because its something that takes time . I would suggest though that they might want to stay clear of power tools and for gods sake don't buy a piece of IKEA furniture ....just sayin


Add this to your notes.

Only certain posters can get away with that kind of stuff.

Mostly Trump haters.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: marg6043

"elements of that story"

"might have been"

"could be"

Classic disinfo Marg. Really? You're falling for that?


More democratic / Martha radditz talking points.


One more step toward outright dishonesty for you.


and nothing more than outright lies from you.

Might have been, if, etc are being used to attack the rights position because apparently only the left can use unnamed sources or hypothetical.

By all means though continue to lie to us... It seems thats all you and a few others in this thread are capable of. After worshiping Obama for 8 years and believing his lie shook line and sinker its not a surprise.


You must have been a terror on the elementary school playground ...

"I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I???"

Give us another vague, meaningless example ... that and copy-and-paste seems to be the extent of your posts.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Actually they say there never were any warrants issued.


which means if surveillance occurred it was illegal and political.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

I think is because the one that doesn't want to give his job away, never in his dreams thought, that he was going to lose it to somebody that never was mean to take it away to begin with, it was supposedly to be handle over to the next chosen one and keep it within the family.


edit on 6-3-2017 by marg6043 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:53 PM
link   
So whose phone was being tapped in the first NYT article?

Anyone?

Anyone?

Hint: It was the RUSSIANS that Trump's people were talking to ...

I can't believe you guys are this gullible, honestly.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

Yes.

Left he didn't do it.

Right yes he did.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 02:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Get ready for the big reveal ...

Whose phone was being tapped that produced those records?

Think before you answer.


Going by the Associated Press standard.

Over 100 people.


That's meaningless.

I see your mistake is starting to dawn on you.



new topics

top topics



 
158
<< 174  175  176    178  179  180 >>

log in

join