It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wiretapping Trump residence.

page: 156
158
<< 153  154  155    157  158  159 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 04:55 AM
link   
I have no doubt that Obama wire tapped Trump. No doubt at all and I think you will see the proof soon enough. Sure...the left keeps saying "Obama couldn't wire tap Trump because that would require a warrant". While that is true...since when has Obama followed the law.

1. He issued executive orders KNOWING they were unconstitutional...and the SC rejected them.
2. He easily could have found a liberal judge to approve this since liberal judges rule by the opinion and political affiliation.
3. He has a long, long history of lying to the American public (keep your healthcare, etc.)

So in my opinion...Obama probably wire tapped Trump. A more accurate translation would be "At the request of Obama, Trump, his home, his office and/or his business was wire tapped to provide political weapons to the failed democrat politicians".

The left has their hooks into this Russia crap and there IS NO PROOF OF ANY WRONG DOING! This is the fall-back plan. Pitiful, sad and a bit funny at the same time. The left is spiraling down the toilet bowl of history. It is just a shame that it took this long for the American public to wake-up and flush.




posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 04:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I'm still laughing at him.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

Not necessarily, but she IS the White House spokesperson, and she went on the talk show circuit to defend her boss, Donald Trump. She, or any other White House staff member, like Sean Spicer for example, could tell us that Trump "just found out" because of his Intel sources. But, they are not saying that, they're hiding behind media sources.


While Trump is asserting FACT, the White House is saying IF. If Trump received his information from US Intel, there wouldn't be any "IFs".



You should not need any spokesperson to tell you that Trump has access to intelligence information you or I can't see.
You should also not need telling that the Whitehouse spokesperson would also not be privy to this information.

Trump will undoubtedly have the actual FISA requests made to spy on him - if they exist. As yet we don't know the source of information that drove him to make this accusation and we will likely not know until the House Intelligence Committee have completed their investigation. Till then, we can speculate.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Tempter

Germaphobe is a mental illness you know. Just like OCD. He has emotional and mental problems.
He is ED.
No not that...emotionally disturbed...He's emotionally disturbed.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Tempter

He got the idea from an article in Breitbart. There's no meat on that bone. Bannon gave him the article and he started his # Twitter storm.
It's that simple.
The cra cra man had another cra cra moment. It's dangerous. He's dangerous.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:20 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth




You should not need any spokesperson to tell you that Trump has access to intelligence information you or I can't see.
You should also not need telling that the Whitehouse spokesperson would also not be privy to this information.


Look, it's very simple. Trump tweeting that he "just found out that Obama tapped his phones", and then again he tweeted that that accusation is a fact. The White House spokesperson could not/would not say that that Trump's information was from US Intelligence. That's a huge red flag!

Further, the FBI and the CIA have pushed back the notion of Trump's personal phone or residence having been tapped.

However, if it were true, then that would mean that Trump was/is the target of a FISA investigation, and he nor his administration, would be privy to their Intel. Maybe that's why he needs his friends in Congress to launch a distracting witch hunt for him, now that he's lost Jeff Sessions.

That would be a big mistake for Trump, in that case. He just keeps digging himself deeper and deeper!
edit on 6-3-2017 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Yeah. Why is that?



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

I'm still laughing at him.


and yet he is President and Clinton is washed up and not.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

Yeah. Why is that?


Maybe read the entire exchange before asking questions that were already answered.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth




You should not need any spokesperson to tell you that Trump has access to intelligence information you or I can't see.
You should also not need telling that the Whitehouse spokesperson would also not be privy to this information.


Look, it's very simple. Trump tweeting that he "just found out that Obama tapped his phones", and then again he tweeted that that accusation is a fact. The White House spokesperson could not/would not say that that Trump's information was from US Intelligence. That's a huge red flag!

Further, the FBI and the CIA have pushed back the notion of Trump's personal phone or residence having been tapped.

However, if it were true, then that would mean that Trump was/is the target of a FISA investigation, and he nor his administration, would be privy to their Intel. Maybe that's why he needs his friends in Congress to launch a distracting witch hunt for him, now that he's lost Jeff Sessions.

That would be a big mistake for Trump, in that case. He just keeps digging himself deeper and deeper!


Yeah looks like he is really digging himself deeper... into the Oval Office that is as his cabinet continues to get approved despite the powerless democrats.


So far nothing the left is throwing at him is working. In fact, lots of back tracking at the moment on the 'Russia' story, with admissions that no proof has been found of collusion at all, after months.

As for his accusations, it does not matter how you position it. Trump has access to information we do not know about and there is no clarity on where he got the information from, yet. Anything beyond that is speculation.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:44 AM
link   
Not sure if this has been posted somewhere in the 155 odd pages

Trump is clubbing these idiots like baby seals, fingers crossed within 4 years the globalist embedded in the deep state will be behind bars, anyway...

1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.


2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing emails, joking: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.


3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames Trump and the Russians.


4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.


5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media outlets claim that they had ben aware of the dossier for months and that it had been circulating in Washington.


6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes, and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly or leaked.


7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports, on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency working group to coordinate investigations across the government,” though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would have been secret and involved classified information.


8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.


9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials. The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.


10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as well.

m.youtube.com...
edit on 6-3-2017 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 05:59 AM
link   
a reply to: 3daysgone

Used to be?
If you support trump in any way you still are. Hey you said it.
Me I'm sixty years old and educated and experienced in the world. I grew up in NYC i was a business owner. I'm not naive.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 06:04 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

This isn't the first time that Trump has thrown alternative facts at the American people. Let's see, there was his "birther" claims, then there was all those Muslims dancing on roof tops and in the streets, after 911. Lying Ted Cruz' father was involved with Oswald. There were millions of people at his inauguration, and he wanted the Parks Department investigated for saying otherwise. He wanted an investigation into his claim of 3-5 million illegal immigrants voting for Hillary. Twitter melt downs. War with the US Intel community. War with the media. War with SNL, the cast of Hamilton and Meryl Streep. War with Democrats and Obama holdovers. War with Obama! Loss of Flynn and Sessions......


Just sayin........



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 06:04 AM
link   
What a surprise. They're questioning trumps stability.
Well not a surprise. He had it coming.

( funny now I'm hearing the cell block tango in my head.. the dirty bum bum bum. The dirty bum bum bum .
He had it coming ..he had it coming. .He only had himself to blame) ( I love musicals)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 06:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

I'm still laughing at him.


and yet he is President and Clinton is washed up and not.


Clinton is out of the picture. Who, now, has the most to gain?

MIKE PENCE!

House of Cards. All is going as planned!
Bwahahaha
edit on 6-3-2017 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 06:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

And here we are...off on another tangent.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 06:11 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Can we please get back to the present.
The crazy man in the Whitehouse???

He won. Why don't you guys want to deal with this new issue instead on continually counting votes?
He's not getting those three million no matter what. He needs to accept he was elected by a minority vote and get over it. Maybe he can let go and actually work.
Or quit if it's more than he can handle.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 06:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

Hey I am great. Are you going to dispute that? Ask my husband my kids my friends. I bet you are too.
This stereo typing of parties is very shallow.
We are all Americans well ok you know what I mean.
No one on here is a dyed in the wool anything. We are real people with lives and families who love us.
We'd be well off to remember that when things get heated.

Love to all
Karen

My real name. Or Mom..



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 06:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

This isn't the first time that Trump has thrown alternative facts at the American people. Let's see, there was his "birther" claims, then there was all those Muslims dancing on roof tops and in the streets, after 911. Lying Ted Cruz' father was involved with Oswald. There were millions of people at his inauguration, and he wanted the Parks Department investigated for saying otherwise. He wanted an investigation into his claim of 3-5 million illegal immigrants voting for Hillary. Twitter melt downs. War with the US Intel community. War with the media. War with SNL, the cast of Hamilton and Meryl Streep. War with Democrats and Obama holdovers. War with Obama! Loss of Flynn and Sessions......

Just sayin........


There are a few things that stand out with your post to me

I specifically remember Muslims all over the Middle East dancing in the streets celebrating the 9/11 attacks? Was this disputed?

m.youtube.com...

As for Obamas birth certificate
mobile.wnd.com...

As for war with the media and Intel community... Ever heard of operation mocking bird? FAKE NEWS was just that, Trump showed his true and knowledgable understanding of the powers and tactics used by the globalist MSM and the CIA

Trump never said there was millions at his inauguration, please fact check that

War with Hollywood, SNL, Meryl Streep LMFAO who cares? And for the record, Trump was only responding to personal attacks

Trump said upto 3 million illegals could have voted... Actually given the fact in some states all you need is a drivers licence to register to vote, some illegals inevitably did vote illegally in large sanctuary cities that wasn't part of the recounts which the investigations shut down after turning out fraudulent voting in favour of Hillary, it was proven that hundreds and hundreds of votes were fraudulent

The investigation was quickly closed down and the millions which was raised left over was given to charity, Trump has started a full investigation as it is quite obvious a lot of illegals did in fact vote and a tiny recount already turned up so much fraud in favour of Hillary, personally I think millions of illegals did vote an a lot of fraud also, Trump smashed Hillary the evidence is all pointing towards that

If I've left anything out its because they're more pathetic than the above

Attacking SNL lol still laughing
edit on 6-3-2017 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 06:28 AM
link   
What's absolutely crazy to me is the DNC were working directly with the news media and getting debate questions in advance. They paid off McCain and Graham, wiretapped Trump and STILL lost the election. Hahaha
edit on 6-3-2017 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
158
<< 153  154  155    157  158  159 >>

log in

join