It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bleeeeep
See my "edit again" in the post above.
Also, the two things are symbolic of 2 heavenly things
Ephesians 1:
11 In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:
Job 38:
1 Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,
2 Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
3 Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me.
4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?
Malachi 2:
15 And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth.
1 Peter 1:
2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.
originally posted by: Bleeeeep
Most of my understandings are my own interpretations of Biblical text and of reality itself - I rarely refer to exegesis text or others and i think that's what you're seeing: you rely heavily on preachers and exegesis text rather than God. (no offense.)
originally posted by: DISRAELI
originally posted by: KansasGirl
I've never understood why blood must be offered, to be saved, or to commune with God. Why must there be anything given? And why blood? I understand it represents life, but so why must life be given to be saved/commune? What does the taking of a life have to do with communing with God? What does that accomplish? And, why an animal? What does an animal being killed have to do with being saved or communing with God??
What are the roots of this sacrifice business? I was raised in a Christian home and am pretty familiar with the bible, old and new testaments. But this blood sacrifice has NEVER made sense to me.
(Ideally, you should be ignoring the off-topic posting)
The next chapter tackles this question, and comes a little closer to explaining it, quoting the Psalmist;
What God actually wanted was obedience, and that is what Christ gave.
I think of it like this; What God wants from the human race is obedience which amounts to a complete self-offering.
That is what Adam and Eve were denying in the Genesis story. Eating the fruit is a symbol for doing what they want instead of doing what God wants. Their will was turned away from God's will.
Old Testament sacrifice was a symbol of self-offering. "We recognise that we owe you our lives, and here is an animal life as a token of that". That is why it was inadequate for the purpose, because it was only a token. God kept telling them through the prophets that what he wanted was obedience, and all this sacrifice was a waste of time if it was being used as a substitute for obedience. This chapter brings that out again.
So the point of the death of Jesus is that it was the real thing; complete self-offering, obedience even to the point of death if that's where it led.
Our part of the process is self-offering in faith. As Paul tells the Romans, "make your bodies a living sacrifice".
(This is summarising one of my future threads. In fact there is a whole thread series coming up, but not immediately)
originally posted by: KansasGirl
(In regards to your comment about ignoring off-topic posts, I apologize for wandering off topic....there was a good bit of talk of blood sacrifice in your OP, so I didn't even consider that it might be off topic...)
originally posted by: Isurrender73
There are actually 4 parts to the sanctuary.
originally posted by: Bleeeeep
One more: He gives us will and wants back obedient will but what we gave back was sinful and needed to be covered?
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: Isurrender73
Yes, that strikes me as a fair summary.
(This writer does not talk much about the Holy Spirit, but Paul fills in the gap)
I think I would add that Christ is the one following the path of perfect obedience, in the first instance. The next chapter brings this out in more detail. It is our faith that connects us to what Christ has done.
originally posted by: Bleeeeep
a reply to: Isurrender73
You're thinking pretty close to the same stuff I'm thinking.
Look where I edited my post above while you were probably writing yours.