It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: reldra
Oh come on...how can you support the obstruction of free speech?
I used to be liberal until the last 8 years...you folks are destroying society...you will reap what you sow.
Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[
Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: reldra
You're making it crystal clear you'll gladly shut down any opinions which someone doesn't want to hear.
All someone has to do is threaten violence in reaction to words, and you'll suppress the words rather than confront the reaction.
Meanwhile, you have no respect for those wanting to hear the words.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: reldra
Oh come on...how can you support the obstruction of free speech?
I used to be liberal until the last 8 years...you folks are destroying society...you will reap what you sow.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Learningman
You are incorrect about what accepted science is.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Learningman
a reply to: reldra
I would not attend a conference on why my favourite author was a hack though, even in my hometown. No precognition needed, I am in charge of my self and simply going to an event I dislike then getting so mad I get violent is not a wise thing to do.
Also, not inviting speakers that you view as causing violence in others obviously means there is no precognition needed either, as you must know this in order to consider them a bad idea to invite.
Yes but that's rational behavior: don't attend an event that you don't want to attend, and don't go listen to somebody talk that you don't want to hear talk.
We shouldn't expect that of our precious college age folks.
That is just obtuse. Of course college students will protest speakers at their college or university that they deeply do not like. At a Liberal or Conservative school. Has been that way for 100 years or more.
It doesn't mean they are 'precious' or soft in some way. They are what is our future. Has been that way probably since the beginning of time.
I can imagine similar protests in ancient Athens.
Oddly, somehow, all of them are commie anarchist snowflakes with coloring books now. It's just an absurd idea.
I would think most people know better. This is not new even in a thousand years.
Pushing the idea that white Europeans genetically have superior intelligence and that homosexuality is a choice that can be cured when there's tons of scientific evidence that proves those viewpoints wrong seems just to be a method of keeping minority groups suppressed.
originally posted by: neo96
Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[
Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation
en.wikipedia.org...
Sounds like the left to me.
See speech getting shut down, and violent protest since before the election, and has continued to this day.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: reldra
This was not obstruction. Only the government can obstruct free speech.
Surprised that's the first time you've reached that point in this thread...
originally posted by: Learningman
a reply to: Kali74
I didn't say anything about accepted science.
You dispute that both those branches on intelligence in culture and race are accepted by the scientific community?
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Blaine91555
And you'll remain curious, because the answer to your question is not one that can be given without completely outing one's self as supporting the shut-down of any and all things right.
You dispute that both those branches on intelligence in culture and race are accepted by the scientific community?