It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump wants to WIN WARS while Obama wants us to withdraw, contain, train & apologize to the Enemy

page: 2
18
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Stevemagegod
Did North Korea nuke South Korea?


Neither one had atomic weapons in the 1950's when we left and installed the DMZ which was a pretty clear indicator that the 'job was not finished and there is lasting peace'.


Although complete occupation of the whole Korean Peninsula is Geo-strategically more desirable than just occupying the 'Southern Half', it is nonetheless a toe hold for the US military on the soft underbelly of the Asian continent.

"Geostrategic" : A port and harbor are better than just carriers off the coast.
edit on 3-3-2017 by intrptr because: spelling




posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Spacespider

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
But but but, hillary was going to start ww3, and trump would bring peace on earth.

Man the stuff you guys make up, its nearly like your still trying to sell trump.


Hillary wanted to be aggressive towards Putin..
So I guess we would all be dust now if she won, I can LIVE with Trump


Good for you, now go die for your country, trump says so.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Spacespider

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
But but but, hillary was going to start ww3, and trump would bring peace on earth.

Man the stuff you guys make up, its nearly like your still trying to sell trump.


Hillary wanted to be aggressive towards Putin..
So I guess we would all be dust now if she won, I can LIVE with Trump

Top Russian official: Our relationship with US at lowest point since Cold War



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Spacespider

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
But but but, hillary was going to start ww3, and trump would bring peace on earth.

Man the stuff you guys make up, its nearly like your still trying to sell trump.


Hillary wanted to be aggressive towards Putin..
So I guess we would all be dust now if she won, I can LIVE with Trump


And didnt you hear the news? Democrats claim that Russia "influencing" the election was a Declaration of War.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

As far as I can find, if it's an ally, 100% of the time. When the Philippines asked us to remove our troops from there following the fall of the Soviet Union we did so.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jiggly
its almost like the economy of the usa runs on war..

weiiirrddd


well when you think about Americans in the historical context we are still the barbarians at the gate, we came late to the game, were baptized in blood, and seem to routinely get dragged into conflicts by our allies (not including the last 25 odd years).



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Well..., what can you expect? We are not even sure if Obama is American.

At least not in his heart and thoughts.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
Although complete occupation of the whole Korean Peninsula is Geo-strategically more desirable than just occupying the 'Southern Half', it is nonetheless a toe hold for the US military on the soft underbelly of the Asian continent.

"Geostrategic" : A port and harbor are better than just carriers off the coast.


Wholly irrelevant to the point I was making.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Really trying to blame Eisenhower for JFK and Johnson ?

That is egregious.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: Spacespider

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
But but but, hillary was going to start ww3, and trump would bring peace on earth.

Man the stuff you guys make up, its nearly like your still trying to sell trump.


Hillary wanted to be aggressive towards Putin..
So I guess we would all be dust now if she won, I can LIVE with Trump


Good for you, now go die for your country, trump says so.


You seem triggerable.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Obama was the president and could have changed any of the pull out dates.

Silly to tell terrorists the time and day you are leaving. Did anyone use their head?



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Yeah do that you nut job. Why the hell does the US have to send their sons and daughters overseas to kill, die, torture and create terrorists?
If you like war so much keep it in your own country.
That's why the whole world hates you. World police, but corrupt to the bone.



Simple Answer: People don't like People.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

War in itself is a bad thing, so no not a good thing to promote winning wars as something desirable.

And especially about Vietnam I'm not sure that was the case. Getting out the last staff and people by helicopter. But maybe I should learn more about history, who knows
edit on 3-3-2017 by alexpmi because: typo



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Really trying to blame Eisenhower for JFK and Johnson ?

That is egregious.


I'm sorry, Mr. History, who was President in 1959 and 1960?




posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: intrptr
Although complete occupation of the whole Korean Peninsula is Geo-strategically more desirable than just occupying the 'Southern Half', it is nonetheless a toe hold for the US military on the soft underbelly of the Asian continent.

"Geostrategic" : A port and harbor are better than just carriers off the coast.


Wholly irrelevant to the point I was making.

You're point was 'job not finished'. What job conquering the whole of Asia?

What do you think Vietnam was also about?

Oh ya, the ongoing war on communism, i.e. conquering Asia.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus



However, it was after Johnson promulgated the Tonkin Gulf Resolution on August 7, 1964, giving him the power to send troops without a declaration of war, that direct American involvement proceeded in earnest. By the end of 1964, American troop strength had risen to 16,500, and on March 8, 1965 the first 3,500 Marines landed at Danang, signaling the steady escalation, and attendant rising body count, that would earn “Johnson’s War” its sobriquet


www.historynet.com...

The LEFT/Johnson own Vietnam.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
You're point was 'job not finished'.


No genius, the Original Poster's point was the job was finished AND there was lasting peace. Which there is not.

But feel free argue that point.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Just cause I think you missed it...






posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

That's your answer? People don't like people, so you are greatful for Trump because he promises you get to kill them?

And Trump fans wonder why they're seen as sociopaths...



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   
Well if his failure at his first military OP, is any indication of what is to come, well a lot of Americans are going to die and a lot of failures. Not looking so good.

What wars is he going to start and how exactly is he going to win them? Bomb them into oblivion?



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join