Jeff Sessions, Trumps new AG and Former Campaign Advisor, lied about his Russian contacts

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

What does the Armed Services Committee have to do with foreign adoptions? Senator McCaskill's agenda was clear, not secretive or covert.

Sessions' said that he met with the Russian Ambassador regarding Armed Services Committee business. That appears to be another lie, not to mention how inappropriate such a meeting might appear to other committee members who knew nothing of such a meeting.

What do meetings regarding the Trump campaign have to do with the Armed Services Committee?
Unless context is only valid when you want it to be?

Duh! Sessions was Trump's top National Security Advisor during the campaign! Context indeed.

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

What does the Armed Services Committee have to do with foreign adoptions? Senator McCaskill's agenda was clear, not secretive or covert.

Sessions' said that he met with the Russian Ambassador regarding Armed Services Committee business. That appears to be another lie, not to mention how inappropriate such a meeting might appear to other committee members who knew nothing of such a meeting.

What do meetings regarding the Trump campaign have to do with the Armed Services Committee?
Unless context is only valid when you want it to be?

Duh! Sessions was Trump's top National Security Advisor during the campaign! Context indeed.

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated. His only one on one meeting with Kislyak was regarding his Senate responsibility. An entirely different subject.

You will need to prove the claim of him lying, but proof does not seem that important when you want to drive an agenda I guess... Of course you are all too willing to see the difference in the meetings when a Democrat 'lies' about meeting with Kislyak.

The funniest part of it all is that left wing nuts still think they are being cute and don't realise just how transparently hypocritical they are.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

What does the Armed Services Committee have to do with foreign adoptions? Senator McCaskill's agenda was clear, not secretive or covert.

Sessions' said that he met with the Russian Ambassador regarding Armed Services Committee business. That appears to be another lie, not to mention how inappropriate such a meeting might appear to other committee members who knew nothing of such a meeting.

What do meetings regarding the Trump campaign have to do with the Armed Services Committee?
Unless context is only valid when you want it to be?

Duh! Sessions was Trump's top National Security Advisor during the campaign! Context indeed.

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated. His only one on one meeting with Kislyak was regarding his Senate responsibility. An entirely different subject.

???

Sessions has said he can not recall if they discussed the campaign? How is it possible you know what ws discussed when Sessions does not?

a reply to: UKTruth

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated.

He was asked those questions by Elizabeth Warren. He was asked a different set of questions by Al Franken. Sessions didn't answer Franken's questions directly. Instead, he danced around in denial and said more than what was actually asked of him, offering up too much information, willingly perjuring himself in so doing.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

What does the Armed Services Committee have to do with foreign adoptions? Senator McCaskill's agenda was clear, not secretive or covert.

Sessions' said that he met with the Russian Ambassador regarding Armed Services Committee business. That appears to be another lie, not to mention how inappropriate such a meeting might appear to other committee members who knew nothing of such a meeting.

What do meetings regarding the Trump campaign have to do with the Armed Services Committee?
Unless context is only valid when you want it to be?

Duh! Sessions was Trump's top National Security Advisor during the campaign! Context indeed.

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated. His only one on one meeting with Kislyak was regarding his Senate responsibility. An entirely different subject.

???

Sessions has said he can not recall if they discussed the campaign? How is it possible you know what ws discussed when Sessions does not?

Indeed. Now prove that he did talk about the campaign and support your unsubstantiated claim of lying. You have made an accusation. Prove it. You must have proof or you would not have made such a solid claim of someone lying. Unless of course it was you who was lying?

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated.

He was asked those questions by Elizabeth Warren. He was asked a different set of questions by Al Franken. Sessions didn't answer Franken's questions directly. Instead, he danced around in denial and said more than what was actually asked of him, offering up too much information, willingly perjuring himself in so doing.

He was asked about the 2016 Campaign. He had no meetings about the campaign with Russians. In a civilised world people are innocent until proven to be guilty, so you can throw out empty accusations all you like, but until you have proof it just sounds like partisan crying.

The President is supporting Jeff Sessions a hundred percent. Here-his latest tweet

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 19m19 minutes ago More

We should start an immediate investigation into @SenSchumer and his ties to Russia and Putin. A total hypocrite!

a reply to: UKTruth

I agree that he won't be charged with perjury. Unless an intelligence agency has a recording of Kislyak talking about what his meeting with Sessions was about then there will be no proof one way or another. That said, it doesn't raise any red flags for you that the ambassador of Russia met with a member of the Armed Forces Committee (remember, that's what Sessions said the meeting was about) but he didn't relay the details or existence of that meeting with his fellow committee members? It doesn't raise any red flags to you that not a single member of that committee can fathom why Sessions would be meeting with Kislyak? It doesn't raise any red flags that Kislyak chose to meet with the one member of that committee that was a surrogate and key adviser to Trump?

Like I said, he won't be charged with perjury unless some explosive new evidence comes to light. At the same time though it definitely smells like something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

a reply to: EchoesInTime

Probably a bad move on Trump's part. Now it looks like he's trying to deflect attention away.

This is NOT directed at everyone...but many. Many of you on the left cry "those are a minority of extreme left people". OK...lets discuss that for a second. You claim you are not all one group...you are not all bound to the extreme of riots, assault, burning cars, breaking windows, etc. OK...here is you chance.

ALL of your elected (eg. selected and approved by your chosen group) have decided that nothing Trump does can go unchallenged. From whom he wants on his cabinet to the crap he might take in the WH crapper. Your leaders are on a obvious witch hunt for anything they don't like...and considering that they hate anything (including war widows) Trump supports. And that applies to those of us who voted for Trump. They hate us...want us silenced...think we are the enemy, etc.

Now...prove you are not the extreme. DO YOU SUPPORT YOUR LEADERS, THEIR VIEWS AND WHAT THEY ARE DOING?

If so...you ARE the enemy. We aren't stupid enough to follow your false Muslim plan where there are extremists and moderates. You are either for America or against America. There is no other choice.

America first...Americans first...American jobs first...American money first...America lives first, etc. If you don't support THAT...you are NOT an American.

So speak up! Are YOU as UN-AMERICAN as the leaders you chose or not??? Let us all know!

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

What does the Armed Services Committee have to do with foreign adoptions? Senator McCaskill's agenda was clear, not secretive or covert.

Sessions' said that he met with the Russian Ambassador regarding Armed Services Committee business. That appears to be another lie, not to mention how inappropriate such a meeting might appear to other committee members who knew nothing of such a meeting.

What do meetings regarding the Trump campaign have to do with the Armed Services Committee?
Unless context is only valid when you want it to be?

Duh! Sessions was Trump's top National Security Advisor during the campaign! Context indeed.

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated. His only one on one meeting with Kislyak was regarding his Senate responsibility. An entirely different subject.

???

Sessions has said he can not recall if they discussed the campaign? How is it possible you know what ws discussed when Sessions does not?

Indeed. Now prove that he did talk about the campaign and support your unsubstantiated claim of lying. You have made an accusation. Prove it.

Lord your BS is weird...

(A) YOU claimed he didn't talk about campaign politics...While Sessions in his press conference said he could not recall..

(B) In his confirmation Hearing Correspondence he said a clear NO

In written form
“Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?”
Leahy wrote.

Sessions responded with one word: “No.”

Key word "about" the 2016 elections...

Asked the same question at the press conference?

"I don't recall, but most of these ambassadors are pretty gossipy, and....this was in the campaign season, but I don't recall any specific political discussions,"

TAKE AWAY:

YOU lied when you said he did not discuss campaign matters with the Russians (Cuz Sessions himself doesn't know if he did)

SESSIONS LIED..Cuz he said "NO"...when asked the same question in confirmation hearings...VS his now modified "I Don't Recall"

The AG of the USA sure as crap knows the difference between "NO" and "I Don't recall" whilst under oath..

It is perjury...and you were full of BS in claiming he DIDNT discuss campaign politics.

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

Whom are you so angry at? The democrats are helpless other than protest. Protesting is not un-American. I think the more Trump screws up, the more his supporters will look for something to blame, in your case, democrats.

Most leftists are at home or at work, purchasing goods, picking up the kids from school, cooking dinner, not protesting in the streets.

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE

ALL of your elected (eg. selected and approved by your chosen group) have decided that nothing Trump does can go unchallenged. From whom he wants on his cabinet to the crap he might take in the WH crapper.

I'll settle for him not colluding with foreign governments...

Your leaders are on a obvious witch hunt for anything they don't like...

You mean the NSA, CIA and FBI..all conducting ongoing investigations for over 8 months now?

The ways in which you must molest reality to play the victim of a witch hunt makes it very, very hard to take the complaining seriously.

a reply to: EchoesInTime

Great to see our President has the intellect of a reddit troll..

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

Long time no see post-9/11 Right Wing rhetoric. What pointless war are you trying to get us involved in this time?

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

What does the Armed Services Committee have to do with foreign adoptions? Senator McCaskill's agenda was clear, not secretive or covert.

Sessions' said that he met with the Russian Ambassador regarding Armed Services Committee business. That appears to be another lie, not to mention how inappropriate such a meeting might appear to other committee members who knew nothing of such a meeting.

What do meetings regarding the Trump campaign have to do with the Armed Services Committee?
Unless context is only valid when you want it to be?

Duh! Sessions was Trump's top National Security Advisor during the campaign! Context indeed.

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated. His only one on one meeting with Kislyak was regarding his Senate responsibility. An entirely different subject.

???

Sessions has said he can not recall if they discussed the campaign? How is it possible you know what ws discussed when Sessions does not?

Indeed. Now prove that he did talk about the campaign and support your unsubstantiated claim of lying. You have made an accusation. Prove it.

Lord your BS is weird...

(A) YOU claimed he didn't talk about campaign politics...While Sessions in his press conference said he could not recall..

(B) In his confirmation Hearing Correspondence he said a clear NO

In written form
“Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?”
Leahy wrote.

Sessions responded with one word: “No.”

Key word "about" the 2016 elections...

Asked the same question at the press conference?

"I don't recall, but most of these ambassadors are pretty gossipy, and....this was in the campaign season, but I don't recall any specific political discussions,"

TAKE AWAY:

YOU lied when you said he did not discuss campaign matters with the Russians (Cuz Sessions himself doesn't know if he did)

SESSIONS LIED..Cuz he said "NO"...when asked the same question in confirmation hearings...VS his now modified "I Don't Recall"

The AG of the USA sure as crap knows the difference between "NO" and "I Don't recall" whilst under oath..

It is perjury...and you were full of BS in claiming he DIDNT discuss campaign politics.

What is weird about asking for proof of your claim Sessions lied? Please provide such proof as the onus is firmly on you to prove guilt, especially as you have made such outrageous claims in your thread title... there, not too complex is it.... so , lets' see the proof. You've made a big claim, so at this point I have to assume you are not blatantly lying and are ready to prove what you have stated. Certainly your current evidence of 'no' and 'i don't recall' does not prove anything so you MUST have more.

Please enlighten us all with your conclusive evidence. I'll await with baited breath (though in reality I know this is just more fake news BS that seems to be a common practice amongst some )

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

What does the Armed Services Committee have to do with foreign adoptions? Senator McCaskill's agenda was clear, not secretive or covert.

Sessions' said that he met with the Russian Ambassador regarding Armed Services Committee business. That appears to be another lie, not to mention how inappropriate such a meeting might appear to other committee members who knew nothing of such a meeting.

What do meetings regarding the Trump campaign have to do with the Armed Services Committee?
Unless context is only valid when you want it to be?

Duh! Sessions was Trump's top National Security Advisor during the campaign! Context indeed.

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated. His only one on one meeting with Kislyak was regarding his Senate responsibility. An entirely different subject.

You will need to prove the claim of him lying, but proof does not seem that important when you want to drive an agenda I guess...

Of course you are all too willing to see the difference in the meetings when a Democrat 'lies' about meeting with Kislyak.

The funniest part of it all is that left wing nuts still think they are being cute and don't realise just how transparently hypocritical they are.

He's already established he's a liar before this even took place, but now we're gonna take him at his word?

originally posted by: jordan77

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

What does the Armed Services Committee have to do with foreign adoptions? Senator McCaskill's agenda was clear, not secretive or covert.

Sessions' said that he met with the Russian Ambassador regarding Armed Services Committee business. That appears to be another lie, not to mention how inappropriate such a meeting might appear to other committee members who knew nothing of such a meeting.

What do meetings regarding the Trump campaign have to do with the Armed Services Committee?
Unless context is only valid when you want it to be?

Duh! Sessions was Trump's top National Security Advisor during the campaign! Context indeed.

Lol, Sessions was asked about Trump campaign meetings - which he did not have with any Russians according to what he stated. His only one on one meeting with Kislyak was regarding his Senate responsibility. An entirely different subject.

You will need to prove the claim of him lying, but proof does not seem that important when you want to drive an agenda I guess...

Of course you are all too willing to see the difference in the meetings when a Democrat 'lies' about meeting with Kislyak.

The funniest part of it all is that left wing nuts still think they are being cute and don't realise just how transparently hypocritical they are.

He's already established he's a liar before this even took place, but now we're gonna take him at his word?

You don't need to take him at his word, you have to prove the lie. Simple. That's how things work. If you can, step up. If not, I will continue to call out the BS propaganda.

Well the Russian stuff is over they found the Dems were doing the same thing. Not even on CNN anymore that's how fast it has disappeared.

So whats next I wonder???

HAPPY FRIDAY!!!

a reply to: UKTruth

So then you agree that an investigation should be conducted.