Disney's first 'exclusively gay moment' hits screens in Beauty and the Beast

a reply to: LSU0408

Really? The silent majority? How did all those One Million Moms boycotts go?

It seems to me the only time a boycott has worked in recent memory is when the Left boycotted Ivanka Trump's clothing line and as a result it got pulled from stores due to poor sales.

originally posted by: LSU0408
It didn't make any sense.

Not my fault you do not understand simple analogies.

a reply to: veracity

Do you understand that a bigot is someone who is intolerant of other opinions? We're all bigots. You don't call someone a bigot as an insult when you're a bigot as well.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Okay.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

You're not paying much attention then.

a reply to: LSU0408

I guarantee you right now that Beauty and the Beast will be number one at the box office for at least it's opening weekend. I'm also going to go ahead and say that it will end up grossing more than the 2015 adaptation of Cinderella.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

That's only because the gays are gonna see it 58 times each.

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: veracity

Do you understand that a bigot is someone who is intolerant of other opinions? We're all bigots. You don't call someone a bigot as an insult when you're a bigot as well.

intolerance of bigotry is not bigotry, omfg

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: LSU0408

I guarantee you right now that Beauty and the Beast will be number one at the box office for at least it's opening weekend. I'm also going to go ahead and say that it will end up grossing more than the 2015 adaptation of Cinderella.

yes but the silent majority will not even think about seeing this disgusting gay movie

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: zazzafrazz

My kids would be grossed out by a guy crushing on another guy. I don't ever pay to see movies with main liberal actors or agendas I don't support anyways.

Really. None of my kids would be disturbed in the slightest.

a reply to: ScepticScot

edited...sensitive material not for silent majority eyes.

originally posted by: ScepticScot
Really. None of my kids would be disturbed in the slightest.

Agenda = achieved.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ScepticScot
Really. None of my kids would be disturbed in the slightest.

Agenda = achieved.

Darn it, your right. I have been suckered by the evil gay agenda and are clearly a failure as a parent.

Does ATS have a 'hang head in shame' emoticon?

a reply to: ScepticScot

So what ever happened to just being a child?
Why is the left continually latching onto this insane notion that people must be taught(indoctrinated?) about our current societal construct? Just look at the last Star Trek!
Here is what George Takei had to say about the liberal agenda deciding to make his straight character gay after decades just to push this BS.

Except Takei wasn't overjoyed. He had never asked for Sulu to be gay. In fact, he'd much prefer that he stay straight. "I’m delighted that there’s a gay character," he tells The Hollywood Reporter. "Unfortunately, it’s a twisting of Gene’s creation, to which he put in so much thought. I think it’s really unfortunate."

Now we see them bastardizing a couple hundred year old story to fit the left narrative.
Funny how the pendulum swings...
At first Disney was antisemitic and racist now they appear to have turned into a bunch of SJW trying to virtue signal to the masses just to try and fill seats.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

I'm not saying it won't do good. There's lots of people out there that aren't aware of this.

a reply to: veracity

You mean what you consider bigotry.

a reply to: JAY1980

Get ready for the butthurt crowd to start attacking you.

a reply to: JAY1980

There are people in the real world who are gay.

Not having gay characters in children's fiction would be indoctrination.

Hope that clears things up.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: ScepticScot

I thought that was the constipated emoticon.

Live and learn.