It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I wish he would take responsibility for things instead of blaming others, but it doesn't look like that will happen.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: burdman30ott6
So currently the answer is "NO".
Got it. There is no need for the tirade.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Grimpachi
What the bill is intended to accomplish is secondary, in this thread, to why its under reported (if, indeed, it is).
Honestly, I don't remember every bill being signed by any president getting full attention. Isn't it normal that presidents always get more attention for the things people dislike rather than what they like. It was that way with Obama and Bush. Should it be different for Trump?
originally posted by: Nyiah
Other than sounding like affirmative action for boobs, exactly what does this accomplish? I mean, I'm a woman and fail to see the vast majority of issues the feminists cry into their hot cocoa about, so...
originally posted by: Grimpachi
What does the bill affect aside from telling NASA to give a report in 90 days on how they might be able to implement encouragement?
The bill seems nice and all I just don't see what exactly it is meant to change... no... How is it supposed to change things.
Bills are always being passed that say a lot, but do little. Well this may do something, but we will have to wait and see after the 90 days when NASA makes it recommendations and what they do after that. Don't get me wrong because I do think the bill is a step in a the right direction, but it falls short of any real goal ATM.
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: six67seven
Why do women need a handicap in engineering? What advantage does a Male have going into engineering?