It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hypocrisy alert: DNC verified voter IDs before chairman election

page: 8
58
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 2 2017 @ 02:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Maroboduus

straw-man alert - thats not what this thread is about

but hey - will you appologies when democrats obstruct attempts at voter ID when the next state // national election comes up ?




posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 10:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: enlightenedservant




It was a party election. It makes sense that only registered party members would be allowed to vote in it.

As the general elections are for citizens.... it would only make sense to verify that the voters are citizens.


A fair point, macro parallel to the aforementioned micro argument.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 10:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tardacus
but I thought that requiring ID`s to vote deprived people of their right to vote? seriously, do the democrats have any credibility left at all?
after everything that has happened in the last 6 months, anyone who still supports the democrat party is just brainwashed fanboy,or fangirl as the case may be.


I agree with some of your points here, but the same could be said that supporting the Republican Party is just as stupid.. It has been since Bush at a minimum, more realistically Reagan.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 10:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Devino

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: Tardacus
but I thought that requiring ID`s to vote deprived people of their right to vote? seriously, do the democrats have any credibility left at all?
after everything that has happened in the last 6 months, anyone who still supports the democrat party is just brainwashed fanboy,or fangirl as the case may be.


They try that argument over and over, but anyone with any common sense knows it takes the same if not less effort to get an ID as it does to register and vote legally.
It's a matter of our constitution. Make IDs free then maybe voter ID laws will not be considered unconstitutional.


Then why are people required to have IDs for travel or driving a car?....



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 10:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: hangedman13
a reply to: Swills




When can I expect a thread about corrupt Republicans? It's not like there isn't any material to work with or anything.

It might have something to do with the holier than thou attitude that comes from the D side of politics. After their party primaries and the Sanders debacle prior to Trump winning, honesty and integrity in the Democratic party seems to be missing. Too many years of hearing what is wrong with Republicans, it's time to actually look at the Democrat party and not deflect with "what about the corrupt Republicans?" Yea sure there are corrupt politicians but as a whole the Democrats seem to have a certain amount of institutional corruption going for em.


Oh please, the Republicans have been making moralistic holier than thou claims for decades too, from religious and "family values" to calling liberals communists, socialists, hippies, jobless losers that need to cut their hair, gays, traitors, etc.



posted on Mar, 4 2017 @ 10:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: FelisOrion
So let me understand this. The right complains about voter fraud and how the left allows anyone to vote (3+million illegals), and when they decide to check IDs to appease you children, you now accuse them of being hypocrites?


Psychopath logic.


Wait, hold on a second. They aren't doing this to "appease the right." They aren't instituting this, as requested by the right, across the country for local or general elections..

What's happened is that some on the left have claimed that any requests to do so are "racist" or oppressive voter suppression, but then apparently the DNC thinks that they can have rules to assure voter integrity when it comes to internal elections..
edit on 4-3-2017 by Quetzalcoatl14 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 7 2017 @ 05:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: DevinoIt's a matter of our constitution. Make IDs free then maybe voter ID laws will not be considered unconstitutional.


Then why are people required to have IDs for travel or driving a car?....

Driving a car is not a constitutionally protected right now is it? My point had to do with poll tax, which is unconstitutional.



posted on Mar, 7 2017 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: FelisOrion
So let me understand this. The right complains about voter fraud and how the left allows anyone to vote (3+million illegals), and when they decide to check IDs to appease you children, you now accuse them of being hypocrites?


Psychopath logic.


Wait, hold on a second. They aren't doing this to "appease the right." They aren't instituting this, as requested by the right, across the country for local or general elections..

What's happened is that some on the left have claimed that any requests to do so are "racist" or oppressive voter suppression, but then apparently the DNC thinks that they can have rules to assure voter integrity when it comes to internal elections..
To be fair the OP never showed proof that IDs were required to vote in this election for DNC chair. They asked for signed ballots not ID. Also this was not a presidential election so no hypocrisy, thread debunked.
edit on 3/7/2017 by Devino because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 7 2017 @ 05:50 PM
link   
I showed my ID before I voted just like very time I have ever voted

you guys aren't very bright, are you?



posted on Mar, 13 2017 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Devino

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: FelisOrion
So let me understand this. The right complains about voter fraud and how the left allows anyone to vote (3+million illegals), and when they decide to check IDs to appease you children, you now accuse them of being hypocrites?


Psychopath logic.


Wait, hold on a second. They aren't doing this to "appease the right." They aren't instituting this, as requested by the right, across the country for local or general elections..

What's happened is that some on the left have claimed that any requests to do so are "racist" or oppressive voter suppression, but then apparently the DNC thinks that they can have rules to assure voter integrity when it comes to internal elections..
To be fair the OP never showed proof that IDs were required to vote in this election for DNC chair. They asked for signed ballots not ID. Also this was not a presidential election so no hypocrisy, thread debunked.


That's not intellectually honest. It's the principle, whether at a micro level or a macro level, of whether it is considered reasonable to have strict voter ID protocols in place to guard against fraud. That principle is not fundamentally different between at scale.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 09:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: Devino
To be fair the OP never showed proof that IDs were required to vote in this election for DNC chair. They asked for signed ballots not ID. Also this was not a presidential election so no hypocrisy, thread debunked.


That's not intellectually honest. It's the principle, whether at a micro level or a macro level, of whether it is considered reasonable to have strict voter ID protocols in place to guard against fraud. That principle is not fundamentally different between at scale.
Guard against what voter fraud? Can you prove this (voter fraud) is a real treat of any significance that we need laws to protect ourselves from? Can you also show in the OP where photo IDs were required?



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 07:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Devino

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: Devino
To be fair the OP never showed proof that IDs were required to vote in this election for DNC chair. They asked for signed ballots not ID. Also this was not a presidential election so no hypocrisy, thread debunked.


That's not intellectually honest. It's the principle, whether at a micro level or a macro level, of whether it is considered reasonable to have strict voter ID protocols in place to guard against fraud. That principle is not fundamentally different between at scale.
Guard against what voter fraud? Can you prove this (voter fraud) is a real treat of any significance that we need laws to protect ourselves from? Can you also show in the OP where photo IDs were required?


Election fraud generally has occurred in history, so it is absurd to say it isn't a real potential problem.




top topics



 
58
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join