It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Anomalous Moon

page: 13
32
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

there's this

www.syti.net...

and
www.gravitywarpdrive.com...


but I don't trust Astronauts anyway
edit on 27-2-2017 by kibric because: boo

edit on 27-2-2017 by kibric because: boo

edit on 27-2-2017 by kibric because: boo




posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:29 PM
link   
a reply to: kibric

Apollo11: These "Babies" are huge, Sir! Enormous! OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it!




but I don't trust Astronauts anyway

What makes you think an astronaut said that?

Do you know who Otto Binder was?
comicsalliance.com...

 


and
www.gravitywarpdrive.com...

Which one says there is a Type II civ on the Moon?

edit on 2/27/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

the links are testimonies from Astronauts if you read through them
I cant verify any of it
but its a conspiracy site so I'll at least entertain the idea




Do you know who Otto Binder was?


no I didn't
interesting link
thanks




Which one says there is a Type II civ on the Moon?

I don't think any of them
but I thought I'll contribute something
try to keep ATS conspiracy related and not politics
edit on 27-2-2017 by kibric because: boo

edit on 27-2-2017 by kibric because: boo



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Where?



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:35 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:36 PM
link   
a reply to: kibric




the links are testimonies from Astronauts

Not the "These babies are huge" one.



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

thanks for another good link

you are good at this aren't you





posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I dont like lroc too high up but ok if you like grey dead dust and rock I suppose.



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

no worries
I'll edit

there ya go

just thought some of the testimonies were interesting is all

I'l keep my mouth shut




edit on 27-2-2017 by kibric because: God Bless The NSA



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:40 PM
link   
a reply to: lunarrover

I dont like lroc too high up
How "high up" was the image you posted taken from?




ok if you like grey dead dust and rock

I prefer a nice beach. But the the Moon doesn't have any.
It's dust and rock.
edit on 2/27/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I have no idea.

LROC is too low res, the apollo landing site images are a joke in in the HD world we now live in infact they are rubbish.



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:51 PM
link   
a reply to: lunarrover


I have no idea.
I'm not surprised.


LROC is too low res
It gets to about 25cm. That's better than you (as a civilian) can get for anything on Earth from a satellite. www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 2/27/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Just not a fan of LROC as the images dont give a good enough representation of what the moon is imo.



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage



I'm not surprised.


no need to be a D*ck

God Bless The NSA


edit on 27-2-2017 by kibric because: boo



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: lunarrover

Yes. Data which conflicts with one's paradigm can be problematic.

Best disregard it.

edit on 2/28/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: kibric




no need to be a D*ck

Don't you think that one should understand the "evidence" which one presents?

edit on 2/27/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 12:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

yes I do

doesn't excuse snarky comments if someone is not up to speed
does it ?



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 12:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Show me the data and I will take a look at it but as of now LROC is not worth bothering with unless you can change my mind with good quality data the forget it.

I'm open to anything that is quality.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 12:01 AM
link   
a reply to: kibric

I've gone the hand holding route. It's ineffective in this medium.

Some, however, can be induced to do some actual research through snark.


edit on 2/28/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

so being a D*ck is more effective ?

your doing well

I'm convinced



edit on 28-2-2017 by kibric because: boo




top topics



 
32
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join