It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dear Sirs
We are a London UK based production company making a documentary on the
F-117 for the History Channel. It is a continuation of the most successful
series called 'Heavy Metal'
The show tracks the history of the aircraft from it's predecessors to the
most recent conflict in then Gulf.
We are having no luck whatsoever in getting footage of the 'Have Blue'
(Senior Trend) prototype, it's testing, footage of the manufacture of the
aircraft, and the F-117 simulator.
Lockheed do not seem to have this footage available - but we do know some
exists.
Could you shed any light on this? Any information on moving footage of the
early stages would be brilliant.
Many thanks,
www.flashbacktv.com...
Originally posted by ghost
The Have Blue was a test plane for stealth,the configuration is very diffrent from the F-117. You have two diffrent planes from two diffrent programs.
Tim
Project Harvey?
Up until now, most sources have stated that this study was code named Harvey, a reference to the invisible rabbit that accompanied Jimmy Stewart in the movie of the same name. However, according to John K. "Jack" Twigg, former HAVE BLUE program manager (who was heavily involved with subsequent low observables programs), nothing related to HAVE BLUE or the F-117A was ever called "Project Harvey." "All activities that led directly to HAVE BLUE were never referred to as Project Harvey," said Twigg. "There was a gentleman in the Pentagon...who had some concepts that he entitled 'Harvey.' His focus was tactics and other means, not 'technical' low observables... The occasional mention of 'Harvey' did provide confusion to some, and may have served as an inadvertent cover story." Adding to the confusion is the fact that both "Harvey" and HAVE BLUE drew support from within the Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering at the Pentagon, making the distinction very unclear even to many program participants.