It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Real" alien pic shuts down 4chan

page: 69
153
<< 66  67  68    70  71  72 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Cthulhusquid

Here is the background without the photoshop.


Here is another one...which is creepy, but the background is probaly shopped as well. (Similar background as many others.)

Though its not the same as the background to this one



Nor this one...





can someone find the background for that one?

Here's the pic without the screenshot.


I wonder what movie or video game has this alien model. Cause that's the first time i've seen an ET modeled like that.
edit on th2017000000Tuesdayth000000Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:33:16 -0600fAmerica/ChicagoTue, 28 Feb 2017 14:33:16 -0600 by SoulSurfer because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:29 PM
link   
As of yet, I have not seen one single picture that hasn't looked photoshopped..



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:37 PM
link   
The only pic I want to see right now is the one that I don't think we really studied.
It's NOT got an obvious alien in it OK..

It's black and white but I repeat NOT the one with a grey alien in it.

It's got bushes or trees and something close to the camera that is unidentifiable. It might be a type of cactus or other plant..it has large flakes sticking out of it..similar to the type of plates on a stegosaurus' back

Anyone got that image saved



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Counterintelligence
a reply to: Johnny3000

I'll leave you with this for now


Spoooooooky


Can I just ask if you lightened this picture yourself? The version I have is much darker, and has more head.






posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: MissBeck

okay now THIS is certainly interesting. That shadow.
edit on th2017000000Tuesdayth000000Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:49:24 -0600fAmerica/ChicagoTue, 28 Feb 2017 14:49:24 -0600 by SoulSurfer because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:50 PM
link   
a reply to: MissBeck

No I didn't lighten it. The version I used looks colorised..if you look at some of the bushes their bark looks way too green when it should be brown. I dunno why someone would mess with the colour of the plants..but whatever



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:50 PM
link   
Gone for a couple of hours and return to this flood of new stuff

edit on 28 2 2017 by Johnny3000 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:54 PM
link   
OMG you lot are gullible, easily persuaded to believe something; credulous, its sad to see



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:55 PM
link   
a reply to: MissBeck

I was thinking the other night..could these images be from an outdoor web cam. It might explain how it ended up being posted online.

If anyone wants to search for Grand Canyon (that's my best guess) web cams..you might get lucky on location.

Other than that if anyone can identify and unique species of plants in the image and pin them down to a general area.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Hmm, still seems off to me. As others pointed out, it's laying in a different direction to the other shadows.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Counterintelligence

Are you talking about the close up that seemed static-y and you could barely tell what the image was? That's somewhere inbetween page 50 and 60.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:58 PM
link   
Sorry but have to call this out for what it is, and that is some of these images are ridiculous. Most are badly photoshopped, and others are background images showing an alleged encounter taken from other sources... I really don't know how anything so far shows anything remotely semi-realistic or credible. I thought the embedded data idea was more plausible, possibly leading to more credible information, but so far that is not the case. Either it is one big distraction from another issue and you are all taking the bait, or it is a hoax, and you are taking the bait. The variations between descriptions of the original image also support what I'm saying, because there is no original image - there are only multiple images claiming to be the original.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 02:59 PM
link   
a reply to: dan121212

Many such cases. Sad

Haha..it's a bit of fun, to test deductive skills. You never know it might be something.
It's only trolling if we ain't having fun.

I think people are learning a lot on how to trace down info and tease out clues here. It comes in useful for other conspiracies, even if this is just a hoax.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Counterintelligence

Oh, do you mean those where you can log on and watch online, like they do with volcanoes and such?



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Mnb72

It's kinda complicated.. obviously we don't know if the spark that caused this was a hoax but the behaviour of the mods over there was super weird..yes they may well just be trolling but whatever..like I said you can pick up skills on how to evaluate images and the motivation behind posting them..

Duh..obviously most of the pics are badly photoshopped, but someone took time to creating them, maybe only a few minutes on each one but it was the speed they flooded the boards after the "real" one vanished.. plus the memes people put togeather that fast are usually about 100 times sloppier.

Then the CGI drip fed model.. yes who ever did that was obviously trolling but then why bother producing the final image, which was blatantly obvious, that is was a model. A hoaxer has no need to end the hoax, infact they just get a bigger kick the longer it goes on. Yet whoever made the CGI one admitted to it only after a day or two? Thats also strange behaviour. It also coincided with the timing for when most of the 4chan bans were ending.

It's the strange behaviour that doesn't add up for just trolling. Yes there will be posters creating their own images more and more, to add to the confusion but I think we need to stick to the original dozen or so that came out the day after the "technical issues" happened at 4chan.
edit on 28-2-2017 by Counterintelligence because: (no reason given)

edit on 28-2-2017 by Counterintelligence because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 03:09 PM
link   
This is my first post on this thread, but i have been keeping updated with it for a few days.

The OP stated that a someone had posted an alien photograph which was located " somewhere out in the desert " From what i gather the original photograph has not been seen again.

I am just thinking completely " outside the box " here. Maybe " The Desert " was in fact Planet Mars and the supposed alien had been photographed by The Mars Rover, and someone got hold of it.

Crazy idea but you never know.



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 03:13 PM
link   
but all you are doing is flooding the web with more fakes



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 03:14 PM
link   
a reply to: MissBeck

Yes. It might be an online web cam..unlikley but it's possible



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: dan121212

I dunno If you mean me, but I have not made any fakes. I can't stop other people from making them. But I think the new ones ain't worth bothering investigating because we will be here forever obviously if you start that madness.

If there is anything in this I think the clues are in one or more of the original images.
edit on 28-2-2017 by Counterintelligence because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: MissBeck

At earthcam you can look up some nice webcams etc. from all around the world



new topics

top topics



 
153
<< 66  67  68    70  71  72 >>

log in

join