It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Abysha
Just because we can play mad scientist, doesn't mean we should... That's damned disturbing and awful close to the type of dystopian eugenics hell many authors have envisioned.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Abysha
Just because we can play mad scientist, doesn't mean we should... That's damned disturbing and awful close to the type of dystopian eugenics hell many authors have envisioned.
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Abysha
Just because we can play mad scientist, doesn't mean we should... That's damned disturbing and awful close to the type of dystopian eugenics hell many authors have envisioned.
Well that aside the point. Personally, I fully endorse (like 110%) any and all ways to allow loving homes to have children. I have known far too many people with fertility issues to be judgy about how that comes about. It's not much more "mad scientist" than the weird crap they do at 4H.
But I only brought it up to tell you that one baby can have two baby daddies. Or none. And I think that's freakin' awesome.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Abysha
Just because we can play mad scientist, doesn't mean we should... That's damned disturbing and awful close to the type of dystopian eugenics hell many authors have envisioned.
Well that aside the point. Personally, I fully endorse (like 110%) any and all ways to allow loving homes to have children. I have known far too many people with fertility issues to be judgy about how that comes about. It's not much more "mad scientist" than the weird crap they do at 4H.
But I only brought it up to tell you that one baby can have two baby daddies. Or none. And I think that's freakin' awesome.
Yeah, we play mad scientist to enable this, but then we turn around and encourage women to murder perfectly healthy children in the womb because "there's no loving place for them" ...
If a loving home wants a child, should it matter where the kid comes from?
originally posted by: Abysha
ps edit - and who promotes abortion by saying "there's no loving place for them"? That certainly isn't the majority of pro-choice people as I've never encountered that attitude.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: DBCowboy
I say counter it with a billboard that says 'Real women provide.....sandwiches'.
originally posted by: Aldakoopa
Sounds like a very North Carolina thing to do. Does it say that real men smoke Marlboros too?
originally posted by: Nyiah
You got it wrong, dude. It should be 'Real women provide sammiches...and then wait patiently on their knees.'
If I had the money to burn for s#s and giggles, I'd totally slap that on a billboard and LMAO watching heads explode. Billboard trolling is an untapped resource if ever there was one