It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

O'Keefe drops #CNNLeaks

page: 5
74
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

I know, I laugh every time I watch it, ha! You're welcome.




posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: LSU0408

Even if I was guilty I wouldn't be offended but you did use an inclusive term so it wasn't up to me to decide if you meant me or not.

Nice way to side step the fact that none of that has anything to do with people coming to a conclusion on what has been offered so far. Stances may change as more information surfaces.


edit on 23-2-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: HarbingerToCome

I would feel sorry for anyone in the big cities if a revolution really broke out, I'm confused on what the Assassin's Creed trailer is about though.

I do honestly feel like we're on the brink of another civil war. There's just no unifying between left and right. Trump can follow the same footsteps as Clinton and Obama and still be bashed, and vice versa.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: LSU0408

Even if I was guilty I wouldn't be offended but you did use an inclusive term so it wasn't up to me to decide if you meant me or not.

Nice way to side step the fact that none of that has anything to do with people coming to a conclusion on what has been offered so far. Stances may change as more information surfaces.



How can you come to a conclusion when there's still more information to be offered? Isn't a conclusion the end or finish of an event or process?



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408
How can you come to a conclusion when there's still more information to be offered? Isn't a conclusion the end or finish of an event or process?

You can come to a conclusion about what was presented.

If you listen to 100 hours of that audio and there is nothing there you can certainly say so.

Even if the next segment has a bombshell it doesn't change the fact that the first 100 hours you listened to didn't have anything.

ETA: You can certainly say that dropping 100+ hours of audio without pointers to where the good stuff, if there is any, sucks. That would be conclusive.


edit on 23-2-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: HarbingerToCome
I do honestly feel like we're on the brink of another civil war. There's just no unifying between left and right. Trump can follow the same footsteps as Clinton and Obama and still be bashed, and vice versa.


The left has been winning hearts and minds for decades with games like Assassin's Creed. Take a look at what Snowden had to say about what motivated him.

The lesson Snowden had learned from immersion in video games, he said, was that just one person, even the most powerless, can confront great injustice. "The protagonist is often an ordinary person, who finds himself faced with grave injustices from powerful forces and has the choice to flee in fear or to fight for his beliefs. And history also shows that seemingly ordinary people who are sufficiently resolute about justice can triumph over the most formidable adversaries.


I would feel sorry for anyone in the big cities if a revolution really broke out, I'm confused on what the Assassin's Creed trailer is about though.


One more video of Trump talking about how he likes molesting people and it will be his head being bashed in with a bust of Nero.

www.youtube.com...
edit on 23-2-2017 by HarbingerToCome because: better link


(post by ColdWisdom removed for a manners violation)

posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss


If you ever want to know what this government, this system, this media, this military, this Intelligence Community really is you let me know and I'll be happy to assist you.


No thanks. You don't take advice from the troubled.



It's a troubling world, and the Truth is beyond darkness, so most people hide from truth that doesn't jive with the 'reality' that the social engineers have given them their entire lives. Some of us, we being the amongst the rarest in society, not only have a proficiency at reading thru the BS, but are attracted to the Truth like moths to a street light. Others, you being as common as they come, are like a deer in the headlights the face of truth. So you turn to self-deluded partisan groupthink models such as your loving MSM masters have spoon fed you your entire life.

The liberal facets of said spoonfed self-deluded partisan groupthink models I find most fascinating as the mind control technique that Corporatocracy has hookwinked you all with is top notch, and the typicality of resorting to rude disrespectful copouts as opposed to intellectual debate is unparalleled. I happen to be thin skinned so it just adds tot eh humor value of such interactions.


I find it funny that you would say I have trouble getting to the bottom of things, when you create thread after thread using shoddy sources and dishonest extrapolation.


Really? Care to highlight some of these? Since I have hundreds of threads that should be no problem. Yet I have so many that remain 100% unchallenged despite having as many citations as the best of them.

Here's goes a few choice ones, which are exactly the kind of stuff your MSM masters deliberately keep us all ignorant to:

The CIA's Global Drug & Jihad Empire

The 'Patriarchy' is REAL

Obama/Clinton/CIA and the coup d’etat of a democratically elected president in Honduras

CENSORSHIP: The Universal Language of Dictators

DARK ELECTIONEERING How the DNC-MSM-RNC Work Together In Lockstep To Subvert The Nation

Run for your lives: Invasion of the Fake News!

Can you imagine what people would do if we all pulled our head out of the sand and dropped the self delusions long enough to join as one in solidarity to demand justice?

Cant wait to see you debunk all those "shoddy resources", and all of that 'intellectual dishonesty' I laid forth in each one. Maybe CNN will hire you if you're that good!


We went over that last night. Your dishonesty and ego came out fairly quickly. Was quite entertaining, unlike your threads.


Actually, this defense mechanism fantasy of yours, your Ad Hominem that I do these epic hard hitting pieces to dishonestly stoke my ego, is what you resorted to rather quickly when the debate got tough.

The MSM has convinced you that Democrat / Republican binary partisanship is the only reality that exists, that only such limited baseless perspectives as they've so crafted are to even be considered. When the truth comes along however, you don't have to actually be disrespectful, or RUN from the truth when it comes calling. Contrary to popular opinion, it is actually possible for human being to look into the box from outside of it every once in a while, despite how rarely this ever actually occurs.

Cant wait to see you debunk those zingers I linked there. I'll be able to rest much easier. Hell, maybe I'll even tune into CNN.com tonight and chill in total bliss.... Thanks!
edit on 23-2-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:47 PM
link   
Come on man, more fake outrage by the guy who says nazys where socialist, fake news again.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: AboveBoard
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Let's be honest, they could come out and say "we have an agenda against Trump and we are are brainwashing everyone" and people would still somehow do mental gymnastics around it.


And Veritas could come out and say "we are totally trying to brainwash people to believe CNN is fake News because we have an agenda on behalf of the far right" and...get this... people would still believe them!


And I could prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the MSM are collaborators in systematic perpetual habitual war criminality in direct collusion with the military and government, and we'd see people from both sides go into denial about it; avoid the topic at all costs.

The weird thing about it though is, how it came t be the liberal folks came to be lovers of multinational corporatism in concoction with the Ruling Establishment's war criminal mass murder agenda totally blows my mind. I mean sure, if that whole Bush + Neocons + War in Iraq thingamajig never happened, where they weren't all up in arms about it all all those years, then it wouldn't be completely surreal the 180 degree turn they've taken once it was Obama doing the same evil. The problem is, all that stuff did happen.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Come on man, more fake outrage by the guy who says nazys where socialist, fake news again.


Keep lying. And be sure to drag the derail on for pages as usual. Canadian.



edit on 23-2-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:54 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

What you keep missing is that the MSM being whatever they are doesn't make you the holder of some devine truth.

I'd say you are pretty good controlled opposition.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 02:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

What you keep missing is that the MSM being whatever they are doesn't make you the holder of some devine truth.

I'd say you are pretty good controlled opposition.




I've been called a great many odd things, especially on this board over the years, but "controlled opposition" that one really takes the cake. LOL

Truth is I just go where ever the truth takes me, and all the little tricks I figure out They use to keep us deliberately deaf dumb and stupid, well I expose all of the above the best I can as I throw myself around this dystopian horror flick known as America. Not divine really, but perhaps one might say that 'in a time of universal deceit, the truth is divine', although the willfully ignorant would disagree.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Maybe you are oblivious to being controlled opposition.

Exposing things the best you can might just be you exposing what they want exposed. Hence, your place as oblivious controlled opposition.

Might you be willfully ignorant of that? I'm sure you would disagree.


edit on 23-2-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 03:27 PM
link   
youre ALL controlled opposition.

Also squishy meat puppets.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 03:28 PM
link   
People who are alot smarter than myself will dissect every sentence in the audiofiles and compare it to the news and what was actually reported. I guess we have to wait until the weekend before anything juicy is finally revealed there is another batch of audiofiles coming soon. This will take months to shift through. The only thing that interests me though is the whole people ordering pizza debate and if the MSM covered this crap up. It looked like Trump knew and hinted many times there was something really shady going on but they were too well protected. Who am i kidding of course it's true but some damning evidence would be highly appreciated. I want to watch all those sick #s squirm when they get arrested and their names and faces plastered on all frontpages over the globe.

edit on 23-2-2017 by Perfectenemy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: dashen

How about people who are not really opposing anything?

Also, squishy is relative. Squishy compared to a chunk of granite? That would include "all".



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 03:44 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss



It's a troubling world, and the Truth is beyond darkness, so most people hide from truth that doesn't jive with the 'reality' that the social engineers have given them their entire lives. Some of us, we being the amongst the rarest in society, not only have a proficiency at reading thru the BS, but are attracted to the Truth like moths to a street light. Others, you being as common as they come, are like a deer in the headlights the face of truth. So you turn to self-deluded partisan groupthink models such as your loving MSM masters have spoon fed you your entire life.


You have summed-up much of what is wrong with your approach in one nice paragraph. You believe those that happen to question, disagree with your assertions or assumption are self-deluded, while you espouse your own self-righteousness and "rarity". All while spitting nonsensical words indicative of a nutty, deluded conspiracy theorist.



The liberal facets of said spoonfed self-deluded partisan groupthink models I find most fascinating as the mind control technique that Corporatocracy has hookwinked you all with is top notch, and the typicality of resorting to rude disrespectful copouts as opposed to intellectual debate is unparalleled. I happen to be thin skinned so it just adds tot eh humor value of such interactions.


Do you not find it funny that you mention disrespect, when you yourself are calling people deluded, spoonfed idiots duped by "MSM masters"? Perhaps you would be better received if you did not point fingers at people from the heights of your ivory tower, which is built on a foundation of hypocrisy.



Really? Care to highlight some of these? Since I have hundreds of threads that should be no problem. Yet I have so many that remain 100% unchallenged despite having as many citations as the best of them.


We've been over this before. You were challenged many times in your threads for using crappy sources, one being Okeefe and PV, and instead of engaging those challenges with honest, intelligent responses, you shut down and begin to toss-out laughable retorts and accusations. Any discussion begins at the source and you refuse to address that very simple aspect. If you can't do that, all other discussion is pointless.

You honestly believe we should take your word as gospel because you think your word is gospel. That in and of itself is delusional.



Actually, this defense mechanism fantasy of yours, your Ad Hominem that I do these epic hard hitting pieces to dishonestly stoke my ego, is what you resorted to rather quickly when the debate got tough.


You've made it quite obvious. Ego should never have a place in logical debate. The majority of the debate with someone such as yourself is trying to get past the ego, to the heart of the matter.



The MSM has convinced you that Democrat / Republican binary partisanship is the only reality that exists, that only such limited baseless perspectives as they've so crafted are to even be considered.


How can that be? I'm not a democrat or Republican and I happen to have a personal ideology that sits way outside of that "binary partnership". Now you're just making crap up.

That's more of the dishonesty we talked about yesterday.



When the truth comes along however, you don't have to actually be disrespectful, or RUN from the truth when it comes calling. Contrary to popular opinion, it is actually possible for human being to look into the box from outside of it every once in a while, despite how rarely this ever actually occurs.


Funny. Isn't it you that likes to use obvious propaganda as sources for your "epic" ego-stroking, monster big, thread-of-all-threads and when your sources are questioned, you stay inside you little box and refuse to admit they could very well be wrong?

For example: You used Okeefe's last video as a source to prove the Democrats were paying for rioters, or whatever. When someone simply points-out that the videos are highly-edited and we cannot say for certain the context in which those conversation took place, you refuse to admit that we don't have full context and say that we must believe what was said.

I say we need more information. You say all we need is what we have just been spoonfed. Hypocrisy.

So it's sad that you would lecture me about looking outside of the box, when it is you that has become very good at defending yourself from within the very limited box you have created.
edit on 23-2-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

theyre opposing entropy. that must count for something.

and meat is generally squishy



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:04 PM
link   
a reply to: LSU0408


I don't know about people wanting to hear preconceived notion views. News ratings aren't growing, other than Fox.


That's not correct.

Ratings went up for CNN and Fox through the election. There was a post election dip in Nov-Dec from October but the January 2017 ratings were a double digit increase over January 2016.

Have Donald Trump’s Attacks on CNN Hurt Ratings?
POTUS’ ongoing beef with the network hasn’t pushed viewers away



CNN was up double digits in January compared to the same month in 2016, beating MSNBC in both total day and primetime viewers. CNN’s primetime lineup averaged 1.16 million total viewers, up 38 percent from last year. The rating is good enough to make CNN the ninth most-watched network among all of cable, ahead of heavyweights including TNT, FX, AMC and Adult Swim.

CNN’s January year-over-year growth was even more significant among the key news demo of adults age 25-54, up 42 percent from 2016, with an average primetime demo viewership of 385,000.


How about MSNBC?

January 2017 Ratings: MSNBC Posts Significant Year-Over-Year Prime Time Audience Growth


MSNBC might have finished No. 3 behind CNN and Fox News in prime time as well as in Total Day this past month, but it delivered more year-over-year growth in total viewers relative to its duo of rivals.

The peacock’s cable news network grew +61 percent in total prime time viewers, and +53 percent in total viewers from the prime time demo relative to January 2016. The network finished only 4,000 average total viewers behind CNN in Monday – Sunday prime time (1.164M vs. 1.160M).

In January, MSNBC’s weekday prime time programming slate (Mon – Fri, 8 – 11 p.m.) improved +54 percent in the prime time demo, more than CNN (+38 percent) and Fox News (+35 percent). The network ranked No. 6 in weekday prime time viewers, ahead of CNN.


So you're starting with bad information.


Here's my theory. When you get stories on Fox, you get viewpoints from both sides. I don't care if that side is from a liberal Fox contributor. You still get the left side.


I don't watch as much Fox as I do CNN (and about as much as I watch MSNBC) but I have trouble understanding how anyone could watch Fox and come away thinking they are actually doing a better job of presenting opposing views than any other network except maybe MSNBC — let alone every other network.

You do realize that the network was conceived of by Ailes specifically to be televised media outlet with heavy conservative bias right?

But hey, that's your theory and I'm glad you shared it. Hopefully you'll update your thinking with the facts about ratings and decide if maybe you want to revise it.

I also have to wonder how the average conservative can know (and brag?) that Fox has more viewers than CNN and MSNBC combined in total day and not understand that Fox is the most mainstream of mainstream cable news channels.




top topics



 
74
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join