It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mexico's foreign minister rejects Trump deportation policy

page: 4
6
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 03:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
Mexico does not have to put up with that in the least.

Kinda like how America doesn't have to put up with Mexico funneling people from Guatemala to America right?
Which I suspect many of these immigrants(you are virtue signaling for)are Guatemalan or South American citizens.
Not really taking some poor Syrian refugees and plopping them in central Juarez and saying "good luck" much like the OP implied.
Common sense people!

edit on 23-2-2017 by JAY1980 because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 03:42 PM
link   
To be honest, most non-mexican latin american immigrants would love to be dropped just across the border. Even any part of mexico would be better than having to travel all the way back from their country of origin to hop that border again.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:08 PM
link   
a reply to: damwel

WRONG, we are not through, even if the world ganged up on us... We have the military might if defensive in nature to defeat the entire world. Besides, the entire world isn't going to gang up on the US...it just won't happen.

Jaden



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:10 PM
link   
Mexico really would have no say in the matter. This is precisely why we need a wall across the border... We would just send them through a one way turn stile and say have fun...

Jaden



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: jjkenobi
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Seems the big sticking point is the plan to deport non-Mexicans to Mexico. That's what they're saying is "hostile" and "unacceptable" - and illegal under international law.




if they came from the Mexican border then Mexico should take them



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: soficrow

Why don't we send them off to where they came from? I mean, in all honesty, I wouldn't want Mexico to deport an Iraqi - who came to Mexico illegally - to America.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:24 PM
link   
a reply to: southbeach

Lol, imagine being here from Canada on a visa, it expires and you get deported to Mexico. How bad would that suck, HAHAHA!



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

For sure, if they're crossing the Mexican border then they need to be turned around and pushed back into Mexico. I wouldn't argue that.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: manuelram16
a reply to: Aazadan

FYI, there are no Asians deported to Mexico, come down and see for yourself....


I'm not saying there are, but under this EO there would be. It really exemplifies Trumps view of the problem that he thinks the country of origin for all of our illegals is Mexico. Deporting each person to their country of origin is one thing but we have no right to deport everyone to a single arbitrary country.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
The Asians aren't violent against random U.S. citizens. Violent illegals are the #1 priority. It's called group "profiling".


Sorry, I thought you were anti illegal, not anti Mexican.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:44 PM
link   
Pretty easy to make Mexico conform, implement sanctions and tariffs. Don't like that, well then zero trucks enter zero trucks leave, still not conforming, then the borders closed, all ports of entry sealed, and flights canx indefinitely.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: 38181
Pretty easy to make Mexico conform, implement sanctions and tariffs. Don't like that, well then zero trucks enter zero trucks leave, still not conforming, then the borders closed, all ports of entry sealed, and flights canx indefinitely.


And why can't Mexico do the same thing and not accept vehicles from the US? It's their territory, they have the right to choose who they're going to let in, just as we have the right to choose who we're going to let stay. Because we're not going to let them stay doesn't mean Mexico has to accept them.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan
That's fine, there's Central America who will comply, very easily. Think one way cruise to Honduras or Belize.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan


...Deporting each person to their country of origin is one thing but we have no right to deport everyone to a single arbitrary country.



Exactly.



(Why is that so hard to understand?)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: Aazadan


...Deporting each person to their country of origin is one thing but we have no right to deport everyone to a single arbitrary country.



Exactly.



(Why is that so hard to understand?)








They should be brought back to their port of entry. If Mexico is allowing them to cross, they should stop, and it's their problem.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 05:16 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Allowing them to cross?

By that logic, if they get across the US allowed them so they should get to stay.
edit on 23-2-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull



Many of them do, however, come here through Mexico... If deportation takes place at the point of entry?? That would seem to be Mexico's problem, not ours...?



It's one thing if migrants are caught crossing the border and get turned around, or get refused entry at a border crossing. But what's being proposed is rounding them all up wherever they are and shipping them to Mexico. Completely different and wrong, wrong, wrong.




Personally, I think it's an impossible task to deport illegals, especially in the numbers we're talking about here...



Looks like it's cheaper just to dump 'em all on Mexico than ship them home to their "country of origin."



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Allowing them to cross?

By that logic, if they get across the US allowed them so they should get to stay.

If they cross from the US into Canada and the US has a policy of not stopping them as long as they are just passing through then yes, they should be sent back to the US to deal with them.

They don't need to stay in Mexico, it just becomes their problem, because they created the problem.

ETA: Mexico is much better than they used to be though.
edit on 23-2-2017 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 05:45 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Mexico doesn't just allow them. There is a policy of stopping them but just like the US, they can't stop them all.



posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: jjkenobi

Wow.

Its pretty clear that you either did not read the thread, or just did not pay the proper attention to it. Mexico's issue appears to be largely centered around the idea that Non-Mexican illegal immigrants to the US, will also be deported... to Mexico. Mexico does not have to put up with that in the least. But never mind, just bash anything that stands in the way of the fascist glove puppet you call a President.

*facepalm*

You forgot the "undocumented" part which heavily suggests the illegal Alien sneaked over the border from Mexico.

If a migrant overstays his visa and arrives from Cairo then he will be sent back to Cairo not Mexico as he will have been documented on his way in through immigration.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join