It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

All this Russia-Trump talk, lets not forget Obama open mic slip

page: 3
29
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: TheBulk
America is so pissed. .

no, it's actually just you.




posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:49 AM
link   
a reply to: GAB4754

He did not have the right to tell them that trump would reverse the newly placed sanctions . That was an action against the sitting president and colluding against a sitting president by making deals with a foreign enemy of the USA.
Oh and then LYING about it...
Buh bye trump. Buh bye baby....



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:49 AM
link   
Its part of presidental politics to talk to, negotiate, and otherwise rub elbows with other heads of state and country...Obama talking about dealmaking post election is not the same as the concern Russia owns Trump.

how disingenious..is this thread even serious?



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: muSSang

So that's what this thread is about? Remind me again of the Right's reaction when this video came out? They wanted Obama strung up as a traitor for dealing with the Russians.

How's that for hypocrisy?


About par for the course thus far.

I've seen people praising Trump for the exact same things they damned Obama for. Blatantly.

This is 50 shades darker than hypocrisy.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: introvert

So the FBI was right on one and wrong on the other?


Why would you ask such a silly question?

Because you made silly statements?



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Vector99

By this same logic, the fact that the estate of Elvis Presley has never publicly corrected the National Enquirer proves that Elvis is still alive.



The National Enquirer is on par with wikileaks now?

Didn't know that, thanks for the liberal update.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: introvert

So the FBI was right on one and wrong on the other?


Why would you ask such a silly question?

Because you made silly statements?


The question you asked is illogical based on what I had posted.

Apparently you are having a hard time understanding, so I'll leave it be.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Vector99

Are you #ing nuts? The FBI cleared him????
Oh that's rich.
They're only just starting the investigations. Oh and there will be congressional hearings too.
Trump thinks he can quash this but rallying (lol) again. He is trying so hard to get America's attention off the Russians.

Russia is confirming the contacts.
The dossier is most likely true. Much of it including the disgusting parts.
If he had even one convo about his campaign with them he's toast.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


He did not have the right to tell them that trump would reverse the newly placed sanctions

And there is ZERO evidence he had a conversation about that.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Vector99

By this same logic, the fact that the estate of Elvis Presley has never publicly corrected the National Enquirer proves that Elvis is still alive.



The National Enquirer is on par with wikileaks now?

Didn't know that, thanks for the liberal update.


Nothing liberal about basic logical structure.

I'll explain it to you :

To assert that A must be true because B didn't challenge it is a logical fallacy of the first order.

There, better now?



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:57 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert



The question you asked is illogical based on what I had posted.

No, it wasn't.


Apparently you are having a hard time understanding, so I'll leave it be.

Liberals tend to be bullheaded and stubborn, i understand.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 07:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Sillyolme


He did not have the right to tell them that trump would reverse the newly placed sanctions

And there is ZERO evidence he had a conversation about that.


Only for those who have not heard the classified conversations ... you can't say either way.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Vector99

then why was he fired? LOL



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

When you claim a known source of falsification versus a known source of reputable information as confirmation bias, you lose all credibility in said discussion.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: muSSang

Better pick it up again...



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 08:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Sillyolme


He did not have the right to tell them that trump would reverse the newly placed sanctions

And there is ZERO evidence he had a conversation about that.


Only for those who have not heard the classified conversations ... you can't say either way.

So you are confident in saying the FBI hasn't heard those conversations?



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 08:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Vector99



No, it wasn't.


Yes, it illogical. I said nothing that would invite the notion the FBI got it wrong in one case and right in the other.



Liberals tend to be bullheaded and stubborn, i understand.


I'm not a liberal. Are you going to continue to say dumb things?



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 08:03 AM
link   
a reply to: knoxie

He resigned, most likely forcibly, and most likely because he wasn't forthright with discussions.

Are you saying Trump did a good thing?



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 08:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Sillyolme


He did not have the right to tell them that trump would reverse the newly placed sanctions

And there is ZERO evidence he had a conversation about that.


Only for those who have not heard the classified conversations ... you can't say either way.

So you are confident in saying the FBI hasn't heard those conversations?


That's not what I said.

I said you haven't heard those conversations, so you can't say either way.



posted on Feb, 22 2017 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Vector99

Wait. How and when did this become about Hillary?

Jesus guys. Get a new enemy. She's out of the picture. You guys can't let her go. Just like trump.

On topic.
This thread is about what Obama did vs what Flynn did.
Try to keep focused ok?



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join