It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Vaccines: Yale Study Links Higher Rates of Multiple Dissorders with Vaccinations in Children

page: 4
47
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 08:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Pardon?

Go read the op again and again and again
Actually don't bother, can't help


No, help me out, which part specifically do you want me to read?
Which part haven't I covered?


We disagree, now go live your life

I don't care what you think


You see there's the difference.
I DO care what you think, or more specifically why you think what you think.
I would like to know why you think this "study" should be followed-up when from a scientific perspective it's not warranted.
If you know something no-one else does then please share it.

Also if I have missed something in the OP then let me know, I like to learn...


I don't know if you have a learning disability, try and follow me
I don't care was probably wrong, I don't mind
If you want to vaccinate yourself, your kids that's fine, it's your choice
If others don't, then I understand, now leave me alone

edit on 28-2-2017 by Raggedyman because: Clarity




posted on Feb, 28 2017 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

Anything to avoid answering a straight question, huh?



posted on Mar, 1 2017 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Pardon?

Go read the op again and again and again
Actually don't bother, can't help


No, help me out, which part specifically do you want me to read?
Which part haven't I covered?


We disagree, now go live your life

I don't care what you think


You see there's the difference.
I DO care what you think, or more specifically why you think what you think.
I would like to know why you think this "study" should be followed-up when from a scientific perspective it's not warranted.
If you know something no-one else does then please share it.

Also if I have missed something in the OP then let me know, I like to learn...


I don't know if you have a learning disability, try and follow me
I don't care was probably wrong, I don't mind
If you want to vaccinate yourself, your kids that's fine, it's your choice
If others don't, then I understand, now leave me alone


If wanting to learn more is a disability then yes, I have a learning disability.
Your second sentence doesn't make any sense.
Correct, it is a choice.
If people don't then I'd like to understand why as most of the time it's because they don''t understand or have been misinformed.

A little hint for you, telling someone to re-read something is all well and good but if the person your telling has read it and you still go on about it then do the right thing and point out what they've missed else they'll keep replying to you...



posted on Mar, 1 2017 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: GenerationGap

GREAT find! Thank you!

...and of course there are.






posted on Mar, 1 2017 @ 04:43 PM
link   
Of course, studies have also linked herpes flare ups to autism. And considering the rise in autism cases and the increase in sexual licentiousness in society have both increased together, there may be something to that.

It is estimated that 1 in 5 American women have the herpes 2 virus today.



posted on Mar, 1 2017 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Pardon?

Go read the op again and again and again
Actually don't bother, can't help


No, help me out, which part specifically do you want me to read?
Which part haven't I covered?


We disagree, now go live your life

I don't care what you think


You see there's the difference.
I DO care what you think, or more specifically why you think what you think.
I would like to know why you think this "study" should be followed-up when from a scientific perspective it's not warranted.
If you know something no-one else does then please share it.

Also if I have missed something in the OP then let me know, I like to learn...


I don't know if you have a learning disability, try and follow me
I don't care was probably wrong, I don't mind
If you want to vaccinate yourself, your kids that's fine, it's your choice
If others don't, then I understand, now leave me alone


If wanting to learn more is a disability then yes, I have a learning disability.
Your second sentence doesn't make any sense.
Correct, it is a choice.
If people don't then I'd like to understand why as most of the time it's because they don''t understand or have been misinformed.

A little hint for you, telling someone to re-read something is all well and good but if the person your telling has read it and you still go on about it then do the right thing and point out what they've missed else they'll keep replying to you...



Try learning this, I promise is not difficult
Some people are dubious about vaccines
If the government want to increase the rate of vaccination then they have one choice

Ease peoples minds, you cant ease a persons mind by acting like you do. Science

A little hint for you, bitchin and moaning, demanding, bullying people into your opinion is not going to work all the time.
Go reread the op, if you dont understand it then ask someone, ask someone else because I dont mind what you think.



posted on Mar, 3 2017 @ 03:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Pardon?

Go read the op again and again and again
Actually don't bother, can't help


No, help me out, which part specifically do you want me to read?
Which part haven't I covered?


We disagree, now go live your life

I don't care what you think


You see there's the difference.
I DO care what you think, or more specifically why you think what you think.
I would like to know why you think this "study" should be followed-up when from a scientific perspective it's not warranted.
If you know something no-one else does then please share it.

Also if I have missed something in the OP then let me know, I like to learn...


I don't know if you have a learning disability, try and follow me
I don't care was probably wrong, I don't mind
If you want to vaccinate yourself, your kids that's fine, it's your choice
If others don't, then I understand, now leave me alone


If wanting to learn more is a disability then yes, I have a learning disability.
Your second sentence doesn't make any sense.
Correct, it is a choice.
If people don't then I'd like to understand why as most of the time it's because they don''t understand or have been misinformed.

A little hint for you, telling someone to re-read something is all well and good but if the person your telling has read it and you still go on about it then do the right thing and point out what they've missed else they'll keep replying to you...



Try learning this, I promise is not difficult
Some people are dubious about vaccines
If the government want to increase the rate of vaccination then they have one choice

Ease peoples minds, you cant ease a persons mind by acting like you do. Science

A little hint for you, bitchin and moaning, demanding, bullying people into your opinion is not going to work all the time.
Go reread the op, if you dont understand it then ask someone, ask someone else because I dont mind what you think.



There's obviously a raw nerve that needs some attention with you.

Tell me exactly what I'm doing.
Then re-read your posts and look at the way you've been responding (hint: one of your posts has been removed for a manners violation).

A post is put up (which I've read and re-read and understood it extremely well thanks) which attempts to cast doubt on the safety of vaccines.
It's attempting to look and sound scientific to the layman to prey on that dubious nature you mentioned.
However, to a non-layman, it fails in every aspect of the scientific method.
It's not science, it's lies.
The one and only reason it's been made is to frighten people away from being vaccinated (and why i can only guess at). If left unchecked no doubt people will decide against vaccination based upon it's fabricated conclusions and intimations.

This and all of the other anti-vax scare studies are the reason why people are questioning vaccines.
So whilst it's always valid to question science it's equally valid to dismiss science when it's obviously fabricated like this one.
Okay, it seems like you have a distrust of government, welcome to the masses but does that mean that everyone who questions them is right? No, not at all, certainly not in this case.

Instead of blaming the government and asking them to calm people's fears you should instead attack the ghouls who put this information out there.

They should be outed for what they are, anti-vax and anti-health with no care nor responsibility for anyone other than themselves.
They are the ones doing harm so I suggest you take those belief-based blinkers off and take a proper look at the real world.
Either that or go and lie down in a dark room, you sound like you need it.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 03:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Pardon?

Oh well done you, you have an opinion, good boy you,, we like that
I have one as well, now run along



posted on Mar, 9 2017 @ 04:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Pardon?

Oh well done you, you have an opinion, good boy you,, we like that
I have one as well, now run along


Wrong again sonny Jim.
I don't have an opinion, I have facts.

Again, you're not really up to speed on the science thing are you?



posted on Mar, 9 2017 @ 07:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Pardon?

Oh well done you, you have an opinion, good boy you,, we like that
I have one as well, now run along


Wrong again sonny Jim.
I don't have an opinion, I have facts.

Again, you're not really up to speed on the science thing are you?

Sonny Jim?
Creepy, Jim Snailyn to my friends..

Here I am asking for the facts, go ahead
Best of luck



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

I don't know you so I can't call you a friend.

Plenty of facts out there if you look.
Plenty of fiction too, see OP...



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Pardon?

You can call me friend or if taken, anyway you want. We disagree on this as well as many other things I am sure
Facts, unfortunately I have seen the truth manipulated, construed, twisted and poisoned to reach an outcome to a persons likening for their own benefit though they were complete lies
I could go on, facts don't mean anything and neither does evidence

I am still undecided



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 04:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Pardon?

You can call me friend or if taken, anyway you want. We disagree on this as well as many other things I am sure
Facts, unfortunately I have seen the truth manipulated, construed, twisted and poisoned to reach an outcome to a persons likening for their own benefit though they were complete lies
I could go on, facts don't mean anything and neither does evidence

I am still undecided


That paragraph pretty much sums up every anti-vax "study" I've ever seen.

The thing about real science is that it stands up to scrutiny.
And if it stands up to scrutiny then scientifically it has to be accepted and therefore becomes fact.
Whether you as an individual agrees with that is completely irrelevant and would only become relevant if you could challenge them on a scientific level.

So no, we don't really disagree as such because we're not singing from the same sheet.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 05:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Pardon?

You can call me friend or if taken, anyway you want. We disagree on this as well as many other things I am sure
Facts, unfortunately I have seen the truth manipulated, construed, twisted and poisoned to reach an outcome to a persons likening for their own benefit though they were complete lies
I could go on, facts don't mean anything and neither does evidence

I am still undecided


That paragraph pretty much sums up every anti-vax "study" I've ever seen.

The thing about real science is that it stands up to scrutiny.
And if it stands up to scrutiny then scientifically it has to be accepted and therefore becomes fact.
Whether you as an individual agrees with that is completely irrelevant and would only become relevant if you could challenge them on a scientific level.

So no, we don't really disagree as such because we're not singing from the same sheet.


And your pro vax and I believe every thing I am told by those who tell me they are smarter than me is the same stuff I hear from sheep every day of my life

What you believe is irrelevant to me, tough it out sweety

Of course we don't disagree, we agree, yeah sure we do

Facepalm



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:01 PM
link   
OP, here. Since we've gotten away from the study, and the discourse has gone to the Vaxer - AntiVaxer binary debate I figure I'll throw in my two pennies:

There's ridiculous assumptions on both sides; mainly because it's not a binary debate, IMO.

Vaxxers seem to be on board with anything science wants to inject into the human body. There's going to be a new wave of vaccinations, it's already started, and we are bound to discover that certain vaccines affect different people differently. Age, race, sex, hormonal make up, and even individual organ capability (i.e. hypothyroidism) will determine what side affects these new wave of vaccines present. Only until there's been a generation of people these have been injected into, we will not have the data to say which is safe for whom; and even then it's only going to be based on probabilities not certainties.

Anti-Vaxers seem to reject all vaccinations. That's a bit too far. As far as my skepticism; my own pediatrician recommended that I not do the MMR All-in-One vaccine with my kid. Instead, my kid got vaccinated for mumps, three months later for measles, three months later for Rubella...just like has been done safely for more than two generations.

For me, I think there's hysteria on both sides. The West Boro Science Churchers that believe every new thing science comes up with is good for you, so take it and ask no questions, are completely out of their freaking minds. The folks that say any thing science comes up with is out evil are simply out of touch with history and some of the miracles science is capable of...

But we have got to come at this with rational minds; and those that insist on making this a binary issue, regardless of what side of the isle they are on of that choice, are completely irrational.

That's my take.



new topics




 
47
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join