It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66
Is it illegal to communicate with the Russian Ambassador for starters? It has already been determined and reported that nothing illegal happened in the conversation between Flynn and the Ambassador.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66
Is it illegal to communicate with the Russian Ambassador for starters? It has already been determined and reported that nothing illegal happened in the conversation between Flynn and the Ambassador.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66
Is it illegal to communicate with the Russian Ambassador for starters? It has already been determined and reported that nothing illegal happened in the conversation between Flynn and the Ambassador.
There have always been leaks of information, sometimes classified, to the press.
How is that evidence of a collusion between "the deep state" (what is that by the way, outside of a right-wing PC term?) and "the media" (all media? including that which is routinely favorable to the President as I noted above?)?
Your statement is evolving to be off-topic in my opinion.
Suffice it to say that "mainstream media" includes bias off all sorts, economic and political.
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66
Is it illegal to communicate with the Russian Ambassador for starters? It has already been determined and reported that nothing illegal happened in the conversation between Flynn and the Ambassador.
It has already been determined and reported that he most likely did discuss sanctions, which is, in fact, potentially illegal.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
Ah.
Your source is your own opinion. Are you saying your opinion is unsubstantiated by facts that you can reference?
Is it true or false that unnamed, unelected and faceless bureaucrats are leaking classified information to the press?
There have always been leaks of information, sometimes classified, to the press.
How is that evidence of a collusion between "the deep state" (what is that by the way, outside of a generic theortical term?) and "the media" (all media? including that which is routinely favorable to the President as I noted above?)?
Your statement is evolving to be off-topic in my opinion.
Suffice it to say that "mainstream media" includes bias off all sorts, economic and political.
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: odzeandennz
It's really amazing how you guys were crying that the Russian's were "tempering" with the elections, by allegedly leaking the DNC hacks to Wikileaks, and your refusal to this day to recognize what was leaked, but you mind when some of us are questioning who's the source of this treasonous action?
Why aren't you questioning source know?
OK. Here's the thing
What would be illegal to discuss would be quid pro quo style conversation about them. This did not happen.
There is NO transcript of this call that we have been allowed to see. So all we have to go on are what we are being told second, third, fourth-hand and selectively.
originally posted by: ROBOTNINJADRAGON
You have to love the commitment, guy literally fired for talking to Russia, and still Trump supporters deny Russia even exists.
Such dedication.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Liquesence
Isn't it illegal to comment publically on an ongoing investigation like this?
Hmmm?
originally posted by: Taggart
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: neo96
It doesn't matter whether or not people like Trump or not.
When government agencies are undermining the US GOVERNMENT.
THAT'S A PROBLEM.
A big one.
...and what was your response when it was reported that foreign intelligence services were meddling in the recent election, and that Trump himself was encouraging them to do so?
Trump didn't "encourage" them to do anything. He was talking tongue-in-cheek
Ah that old defense. He said it but he didn't mean it.
Laughable.
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66
Is it illegal to communicate with the Russian Ambassador for starters? It has already been determined and reported that nothing illegal happened in the conversation between Flynn and the Ambassador.
It has already been determined and reported that he most likely did discuss sanctions, which is, in fact, potentially illegal.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen
Everything the government does is documented. I'm sure there's a record of her approaching the administration with important security information. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Did you look to see if there was proof?
Which must be why he was #canned.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66
Is it illegal to communicate with the Russian Ambassador for starters? It has already been determined and reported that nothing illegal happened in the conversation between Flynn and the Ambassador.
It has already been determined and reported that he most likely did discuss sanctions, which is, in fact, potentially illegal.
The FBI has already cleared Flynn of doing anything illegal.