It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The SJWFRONT has declared open war in their New Inquisition.

page: 19
<< 16  17  18   >>

log in


posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 05:50 PM
a reply to: daskakik

I said the following"

"Progressives" are punching anyone on the streets that one of theirs points to and calls a nazi. Hell at berkely they even managed to beat up a syrian muslim because one of them said "you look like a nazi" , Getting the picture now? Beating p people jsust because YOU call them a nazi most certaintly does not make you a hero it makes you a zero, not to mention a straight up dumb azz bully.

Do you still need the context of "it" spelled out for you?
Correct i do not see "progressives" [much like the person that was a response to] criticizing the dishonest media and the fact that they are just a bunch of activists shills instead of journalists is exactly why people do not trust them anymore.

After he receives confirmation that i defiantly see people not trusting the msm anymore he comes up with :

You can't see the people doubting the MSM en masse, why am I not surprised? Care to put up some numbers?

after which i confirm once again that i already stated that i did.

To help you a bit more :

.I do not see regressive SJW's criticizing the shilling media like cnn and friends.
.I definitely see people not trusting the MSM anymore because of it.
.Your boyfriend here keeps pretending that i did not say that and keeps talking to himself.

posted on Feb, 23 2017 @ 06:09 PM
a reply to: everyone

They are different its. Maybe you should stop going further back than the post being replied to.

No need to get snippy just because you are having a hard time following a thread.
edit on 23-2-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 12:04 PM
a reply to: everyone

Her progressive boyfriend criticises the MSM on a daily basis. You might think that the Trumpistas are the only ones doing so, but then you probably slept throught the last 10 years and didn't care much about anything at all.

I'd call this everyones generalisation debacle and it illustrates the whole topic in a pretty compelling way.

posted on Feb, 27 2017 @ 12:38 PM
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

And unfortunately for you and I both, we all have to sleep in the Trump bed.

Um. I didn't mean that how it came out...

posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 04:40 PM

How Liberal Portland Became America’s Most Politically Violent City
And it’s about to get worse, say protesters on both sides.
June 30, 2017
The fact that Portland erupted as the epicenter in Trump-era political violence in the U.S. is, in a certain sense, surprising. A liberal nirvana, a crunchy, weed-and-hops city where Republicans and plastic bags alike have been all but evicted, Portland has embodied and outpaced many of the urban trends of the early 21st century: gentrification and co-ops, food trucks and footbridges, transitions to a bike-and-pedestrian economy. It is, as a conspicuous show has encapsulated, a progressive paradise.
From its inception, Portland’s antifa contingent cloaked itself in anonymity; as a 2009 story in Portland’s Willamette Week noted, “Little is known publicly about Rose City Antifa.” And little seems to have changed in the decade since. Its unofficial uniform comprises blood-red and black bandanas and hoods, but the group doesn’t keep any official membership rolls, let alone share last names with anyone outside of its circle. “Why do we wear masks? Because [of] instances of antifa people [who] have been assassinated,” says David, a member of Rose City Antifa who, like all group members before him, declined to share his last name with POLITICO Magazine. The historical examples are not recent, but they are well-known in the group: Skinheads murdered a pair of anti-racist activists in Nevada in 1998, luring them to the desert outside Las Vegas, and local antifa have claimed that a 2010 incident in Portland—a shooting that left a self-described anti-racist skinhead in critical condition—was also politically motivated.

For much of its existence, the group largely relied on shout-downs and public displays of force as their primary tactics. Recently they’ve added the cyber weapon of doxxing—exposing personal information such as addresses, places of employment, and dates of birth and schools, even if it means innocent families mistakenly targeted by antifa begin receiving threats. Such tactics have been “effective because they raise the cost of participation,” Stanislav Vysotsky, who researches political extremism with the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, told POLITICO Magazine.

But now, for antifa, it’s not enough to simply outscream their opposition; rather, those far-right forces must, in a bizarre nod to the Bush Doctrine, be preemptively denied a voice from the outset. “We are unapologetic about the reality that fighting fascism at points requires physical militancy,” Rose City Antifa’s Facebook page reads. “Anti-fascism is, by nature, a form of self-defense: the goal of fascism is to exterminate the vast majority of human beings.” The group does not specify what physical militancy means, but their page makes clear that the definition includes “any means necessary.”

edit on 30-7-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

top topics
<< 16  17  18   >>

log in