It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The SJWFRONT has declared open war in their New Inquisition.

page: 12
48
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: AboveBoard

I'm saying that while you may have an opinion and express it per the 1st amendment, encouraging people to see those whose opinions differ as "terrorists," and everyone knows violence and incarceration without due process is how we treat terrorists, is against the intent of the very rule of law you are claiming to uphold.

Come on, Cowboy, you are better than this.


Terrorists use violence and/or threats of violence to bring about political change.

I'm not threatening violence. Liberals aren't threatening violence.

Leftists, socialists, Marxists are.




posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 06:58 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

There's lots of special snowflake BS on Bakedbeard and stuff, don't fool yourself with this partisan pink glasses crap.

Scrutinize specific issues instead, that'd be something I could support blindly. Political baiting not so much, nope. Boring as hell, actually.

Gimme my ATS back, you Dick Cheneys!



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 07:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

A thread in which I refused to follow the herd and blame a Muslim until there was proof.

Good examples, if you ask me.

Thanks!


And you were dead wrong.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

Does that mean that this craze is so far along that partisanship now means that one side of the society are SJWFRONT, and the rest are anti-SJWFRONT?



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

That's about the exact opposite of reality.

There's some idiots on the left.

There's some idiots on the right.

Then there's people like you who point to their opposite and scream hey look at them, they're gonna destroy us all and break the Constitution and burn America to the ground and make them out to be a freaking army on the march when in reality it's a very tiny portion of a group screaming very loudly. You have become that which you decry.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

It's Brawndo, just Brawndo. Cause Brawndo is what plants crave, right? Who needs water anyway, do you see plants growing out of the toilet?

Yeah, Not. Sure.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 07:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74



There's some idiots on the left.

There's some idiots on the right.


I wonder what percentage of the far left wing and the far right wing you'd have to amputate in order to reach even a grudging consensus? Could you do it by ignoring the furthest most 10 percent of the right and left? Would the right and left have to amputate evenly?

I don't know.




edit on 15-2-2017 by imwilliam because: it's late, i'm old, i can't spell



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

I was being sarcastic, because the insinuation there was that I'm a "partisan" hack (merely for speaking out against this violent subversive cult).

It could be only a 'minority' of the liberal base out doing these wicked brutal acts. But then the majority of the liberal base they either wont criticize them, or they outright defend them, or they "Passive Regressively" defend them (derail threads and various other apologism & trolling techniques when people try to criticize them).

So keep sticking up for them, and you're part of the problem to.

It's just like Islam where sure the vast majority wont go do the brutal, yet by and large the rest of the community all support it (a great many of which support it rabidly so). The irony there that the majority of the liberal base all fall in the same way with the Muslim's even when their most sick and brutal barbaric cultural practices are being criticized. Since we're now seeing them replicate their angry violent mob tactics, their brutal oppression of people that dont think like them, their rabid anti-free speech posture, and so on... it's no wonder they go out of their minds defending these kinds of practices on Islam's part as it's rather obvious now that by all intensive purposes they've moved beyond being mere sympathizers... now they're like minded as well.




edit on 15-2-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: AboveBoard

I'm saying that while you may have an opinion and express it per the 1st amendment, encouraging people to see those whose opinions differ as "terrorists," and everyone knows violence and incarceration without due process is how we treat terrorists, is against the intent of the very rule of law you are claiming to uphold.

Come on, Cowboy, you are better than this.


Terrorists use violence and/or threats of violence to bring about political change.

I'm not threatening violence. Liberals aren't threatening violence.

Leftists, socialists, Marxists are.


Ok. So you've narrowed the group of subversives to "leftists, socialists and Marxists."

How many of them are subversive criminals? Give me some hard facts, please, to put this in perspective.

Millions? Hundreds of thousands? Thousands? Humdreds? Tens? A hand's worth? Are they taking over city's? Blowing up buildings? Blowing up themselves in malls? Gunning down churchgoers or children in schools?

How many deserve the label of terrorist?




posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:22 PM
link   
a reply to: AboveBoard



-the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
-the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal
-the use of violence as a means of achieving a goal
-the unlawful use or threat of violence especially against the state or the public as a politically motivated means of attack or coercion
www.merriam-webster.com...

Therefore...
People whom have involvement with SJWFRONT terrorists are terrorist collaborators.

People whom feel for SJWFRONT terrorists are terrorist sympathizers.

People whom go online and defend and/or deliberately troll & derail threads where people are criticizing SJWFRONT terrorists are terrorist defenders.

People whom donate to SJWFRONT causes are terroist supporters.

Any questions?
edit on 15-2-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: AboveBoard

I'll ask for a show of hands.

Or count legs and divide by two.

How many terrorists does it take to cause damage?



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: AboveBoard



Violence and threats for political coercion.

Not violence OR threats OR politics OR saying things other people disagree with. Got it.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:35 PM
link   
a reply to: AboveBoard

The definition applies to people whom resort to brutality in order to silence their political opposition. Or two alter an election. And those people whom who calling their state Electoral College members and giving them death threats if they voted for Trump. Etc.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: imwilliam
a reply to: Kali74



There's some idiots on the left.

There's some idiots on the right.


I wonder what percentage of the far left wing and the far right wing you'd have to amputate in order to reach even a grudging consensus? Could you do it by ignoring the furthest most 10 percent of the right and left? Would the right and left have to amputate evenly?

I don't know.





I don't know if it's even. This must be how my mom felt when I screamed at my mom that my brother had more milk in his cereal than I did. What I do know is that there's several threads a day on ATS and /r/T_D and other places about some fool headed thing a lefty/group of lefties did. Meanwhile I read several articles a day about some fool headed thing a righty did and think to myself this is why I'm not a right winger. Personally? I'd rather focus on Policy that I disagree with.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:44 PM
link   
No amount of evidence will ever convince a zealot to the contrary. The leftist mindset is not geared towards understanding and logic, it is dedicated to winning arguments. When the SJW cannot win an argument, even through the use of slurs and demeaning their opponents, the only option remaining is turning towards violence; as evidenced on a weekly basis as of late.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: AboveBoard

The definition applies to people whom resort to brutality in order to silence their political opposition. Or two alter an election. And those people whom who calling their state Electoral College members and giving them death threats if they voted for Trump. Etc.


There is crazy on all sides of the political spectrum IIB and death-threats have gone both ways in this horror-fest of an election cycle.

Broad swaths of the "left" are not terrorists just as broad swaths of the "right" are not terrorists.

We are down to potential lone wolves here, and that's it. To say more than that is propaganda, which is dangerous. We don't need more reactiveness from either of our political extremes...



- AB




posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 09:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Any people that are against free speech (see Milo) against the Constitution (see abolishing Electoral College), against individual rights, are an enemy to the US of A.

Much like ISIS, their ideology is the only one acceptable.



? Milo is very much for free speech. Please provide proof that he is against free speech.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9

He meant the protest at Berkley against Milo that caused the event to be cancelled, not Milo being against free speech.



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 11:26 PM
link   
a reply to: GodEmperor

Didn't you just demean the Left?



posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 11:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

When people are out of their minds and a danger to society, instead of get criticized for it they should get a pat on the back and a wool blanket with a cup of hot cocoa (with extra mini marshmallows). That will get them to wise up to the error in their ways and get them on the right track.





top topics



 
48
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join