It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump ruled an outlaw for violating the First Amendment of the Constitution

page: 2
6
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: masterofuniverse

"Revoked legally" and "coerced into renouncing" are two wildly different concepts.




posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

The EO's religion applies to foreign citizens on foreign soil. The US constitution doesn't apply.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: masterofuniverse

The judges ruling is not granting Constitutional protections to foreigners. Tje ruling applies to the EO. The EO is wriiten with a bias against a religion. The Constitution forbids writing laws with religious bias.


Explain to me.

How telling a muslim from those seven states they have to wait a while to come in violates their religious beliefs ?

The US is hardly on the pilgrimage list.

In fact for YEARS now Trump haters have said we are not a religious nation of any creed.
edit on 14-2-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:31 PM
link   
It tickles me when the British criticize the USA over Constitutional issues when they don't even have one.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Foreign citizens who haven't passed US customs do not have constitutional rights.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: masterofuniverse

Holders of legal resident status have the right to due process before their status is revoked.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Source?



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Except Christians...



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:33 PM
link   
Citizen vs civilian. There's a huge difference.

www.youtube.com...
edit on 14-2-2017 by masterofuniverse because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: windword

You spelt "the Obama Administration" wrong.

He already targetted these 7 countries, and Trump just sealed the deal that Obama had in mind.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:33 PM
link   
it doesn't matter. The new chant, Trump must go!

Some segment on CNN I just overheard on my moms tv said that now they are going after Trump for not speaking up about Flynn sooner, he knew about the 'improprieties' (talked to Putin, OMG) for weeks and did nothing. Can you believe it, Spoke to Putin... (shudder)

Watch how this unfurls...



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

Come on K.

That's not a hard question to answer.

Even a simple yes or no would do.

How telling a muslim from those seven states they have to wait a while to come in violates their religious beliefs ?



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: masterofuniverse
a reply to: Dr UAE

Don't ask me. Ask the judge who seems to think the US constitution applies to Saudi Arabia.


well sir i don't have the privilege to do so, could you get us an answer?



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: masterofuniverse


Once you become a lawful permanent resident (green card holder), you maintain permanent resident status until you: Apply for and complete the naturalization process; or Lose or abandon your status. There are several ways that you can lose your status as a lawful permanent resident.



Removal Proceedings You will lose your permanent resident status if an immigration judge issues a final removal order against you. INA sections 212 and 237 describe the grounds on which you may be ordered removed from the United States.


US Customs and Immigration has a neat website

So yea, you can have your residency status revoked for certain reasons, and they have to inform you that it's been revoked and then you have the right to appeal the revocation at a hearing. "Because we talked you into giving up your status by threatening you" is not one of the reasons you can have your status revoked.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Those two Yemeni men are not permanent residents.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: masterofuniverse

Wrong.
ricochet.com...



Within U.S. territory, non-citizens have rights because of the 14th Amendment, which declares “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: schuyler

It tickles me when foreigners understand the US Constitution better than our fellow citizens.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:40 PM
link   
a reply to: corblimeyguvnor



Where do you get that this is a ban based on religion??


From the Federal Judges who upheld the TRO, based on their interpretation of evidence and the Constitution.



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:41 PM
link   
a reply to: masterofuniverse


According to the Virginia lawsuit, the executive order took effect while the Aziz brothers were mid-flight. Upon landing on January 28, the brothers were handcuffed, detained, and pressured to sign forms they didn't understand that cancelled their Lawful Permanent Resident status. The brothers were then put on a flight to Addis Ababa, Ethiopia — which is simply where their flight from Djibouti had last stopped.


How do you suppose they gave up Lawful Permanent Resident status if they didn't have it in the first place?



posted on Feb, 14 2017 @ 03:42 PM
link   
Hardly any of these refugees are permanent residents. Not even 0.1%. Those who are are given waiver. This interpretation of the First Amendment by that judge is unfounded.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join