Grammy Awards: A Pro-Trump Statement on the Red Carpet-Dress Says "Make America Great Again"

a reply to: Sublimecraft

Not surprising, the Tolerant Left strikes again, at least people are waking up out of their hate daze.

OMG!!!!

A celeb wore something on a red carpet that would guarantee her headlines.

That's never happened before... oh wait... yeah it has.

a reply to: redmage

I can't recall a singer, from a "community" that is fanatically leftist, wearing something that is going to crash their career. It's called being black listed.

Tolerant, I think not. Try again.

a reply to: seasonal

Huh? Where in my post do I mention anything about supposed "tolerance".

It's called "shock value", and it's no stranger to the red carpet.

J-Lo's "green dress". Rose McGowan at the the MTV Music Awards. The list goes on and on.

Celebs like attention, and they know they can get lots of it wearing anything guaranteeing "shock value" on a red carpet.

As for, "going to crash her career"... don't be such a drama queen, or do you think "the left" with give her the same treatment "the right" gave to the Dixie Chicks by burning their albums in the streets when they dared to speak out against Bush and the Iraq war?

a reply to: redmage

Um, why do you think this is going to get headlines. Oh because she works in a frantic and fanatic leftist world that will damn her for doing this.

Tolerant i think not.

a reply to: seasonal

I was responding directly from your OP where say...

I am glad that there is still the freedom of expression in the make believe world of entertainers.
I wonder what the fall out from the tolerance filled left may be?

I'd rather comment on a thread by thread basis thanks, if I think your other threads aren't hypocritical then I won't say they are. I find this one is.

a reply to: seasonal

Again, neither side is "tolerant" when it comes to partisan ideologues.

Just ask the Dixie Chicks.

"The right" burned their albums in the streets when they dared to speak out against Bush and the Iraq war.

a reply to: redmage

True (I don't endorse censorship),
Speaking out about war (during the war) is different than saying I support the POTUS. Or is being objective a fault?

originally posted by: seasonal
Speaking out about war (during the war) is different than saying I support the POTUS. Or is being objective a fault?

You want objective?

Then no, it's not "different".

Freedom of speech is the same as freedom of speech. You're supposed to be free to speak out in support, or speak out against whatever you feel is worthy.

a reply to: redmage

Objective means looking at a situation and not letting personal sh get in the way the facts.

Being objective means seeing there IS a difference.

Fire in a theater,

Anti war during a war (they were right).

You can see some of the tolerant left reaction @ 6:00 in this video






BONUS:
You can see more tolerance and love at the bottom of this page for Adel

milo.yiannopoulos.net...

a reply to: seasonal

No, objectively, there's no difference between supporting, or speaking out against a President when it comes to freedom of speech.

You're "letting personal sh get in the way of the facts".

She was a nobody and no one on this board even knew her name or could name anything she's ever done. Now suddenly she is twitter queen. Let me think....

Here, listen to her.

I never heard of her either.

Black Trump supporter/singer singing white music.

celebrities make statements against Trump "DAMN THE HOLLYWOOD ELITES!"

1 celebrity supports Trump "Way to show the liberals!"

I like this one.

a reply to: redmage

They spoke out against bush in England, came back to the states and apologized, then went to Australia and said we stand by our statements in England... That is when people really got pissed with them.

Us country folks, are not as dumb as people like think.

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: seasonal

I am glad that there is still the freedom of expression in the make believe world of entertainers.

Funny you never say that when they are speaking out against Trump. I will give miss nobody credit for thinking of a way to get people to notice her.

Who did she speak out against?

a reply to: Irishhaf

Not quite.

"The right" was pissed as soon as their statements went public in The Guardian's review of the concert.

They ("the right") bought into Bush's false dilemma logical fallacy of "You're either with us, or against us", and any criticism of the President at the time was viewed as "un-American" when nothing could be further from the truth.

The right to criticize our government is as American as it gets, and it's one of the primary reasons we broke free from the monarchy.

It's no coincidence that freedom of speech is the 1st amendment.

a reply to: redmage

Then why was anyone criticizing Obama labeled a racist?

I agree with you though. The problem is not only one Dems have. I do find them more commonly the perpetrators though.