It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Several towns, cities and counties around the nation are caving to President Trump's threat to pull funding, and abandoning their "sanctuary" pledges to shield illegal immigrants from federal authorities.
Dayton, Ohio, dropped a policy that restricted the city’s cooperation with immigration officials pursuing illegal immigrants arrested for misdemeanors or felony property crimes, according to the Dayton Daily News. Police Chief Richard Biehl said federal authorities will no longer be impeded by the city when pursuing illegal immigrants being held by his department.
Other communities that have dropped policies of shielding illegal immigrant suspects from Immigration and Customs Enforcement include Miami-Dade and Dayton, are Saratoga, N.Y., Finney County, Kan., and Bedford, Penn., according to The Center for Immigration Studies, which keeps a list of sanctuary communities.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: xuenchen
It sounds like Vermont, where I was born and raised, is actually approving additional sanctuary cities. Our capital, Montpelier apparently just requested to become a sanctuary city (link)
I'm sure Vermont is one of the "Die-hards" you referred to in your OP.
"As the world turns..."
Several towns, cities and counties around the nation are caving to President Trump's threat to pull funding, and abandoning their "sanctuary" pledges to shield illegal immigrants from federal authorities.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: xuenchen
It sounds like Vermont, where I was born and raised, is actually approving additional sanctuary cities. Our capital, Montpelier apparently just requested to become a sanctuary city (link)
I'm sure Vermont is one of the "Die-hards" you referred to in your OP.
"As the world turns..."
I thought Conservatives favored power be with the states, and keeping the Federal Government OUT of their affairs? How do you justify this intrusion of state's rights?
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: xuenchen
Just because you CAN bully, threaten, intimidate, manipulate, and Blackmail someone, (or state) doesn't mean you should. Americans are used to freedom. This doesn't sound much like freedom.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: xuenchen
Just because you CAN bully, threaten, intimidate, manipulate, and Blackmail someone, (or state) doesn't mean you should. Americans are used to freedom. This doesn't sound much like freedom.
originally posted by: neo96
No person or group of people is above the LAW.
Anyone that says otherwise(excusing illegals behavior) is insulting every single American citizen that gets beat on the head with them every single day.
If the LAWS don't have to be followed then do away with the Judiciary, and congress.
Do away with it.
Until then.
People. No matter who they are or where they come from don't get to pick and choose, and think they are above them.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: xuenchen
Well here you are back. I thought I had shut you up with my brilliant wisdom.
I don't like the smell of it.
originally posted by: angeldoll
I thought Conservatives favored power be with the states, and keeping the Federal Government OUT of their affairs?
How do you justify this intrusion of state's rights?
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: xuenchen
It sounds like Vermont, where I was born and raised, is actually approving additional sanctuary cities. Our capital, Montpelier apparently just requested to become a sanctuary city (link)
I'm sure Vermont is one of the "Die-hards" you referred to in your OP.
"As the world turns..."