It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Thank you.

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

# Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Radiation So Destructive, Not Even Robots Can Survive

page: 4
13
share:

posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 11:23 PM

originally posted by: Phage

I was explaining how to analyze the odds of the correlation between three words and how difficult it would be to succeed at guessing the right words by pure chance.

I believe you said the odds were "astronomical." Please show your work.

I did for a few pages now.

I gave enough information and articulated enough explanation to sufficiently show enough work to make the case.

posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 11:24 PM

I did for a few pages now.

No you didn't.
You arm waved. Statistics isn't arm waving. Is it? Have you taken a class in statistics?

edit on 2/11/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 11:28 PM

originally posted by: Phage
I didn't want to. I had to because it was brought up.

No one forced you to argue about anything.

posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 11:28 PM

I have no religion.

posted on Feb, 12 2017 @ 08:18 AM
Wow!

...and then there was Fukishima.

Yeah, that thing.

posted on Feb, 12 2017 @ 11:04 AM
Reminder~~~~

This is the TOPIC:

## Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Radiation So Destructive, Not Even Robots Can SurviveText

and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!
edit on Sun Feb 12 2017 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 12 2017 @ 01:10 PM

Reminder~~~~

This is the TOPIC:

## Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Radiation So Destructive, Not Even Robots Can SurviveText

and, as always:
Do NOT reply to this post!!

Thanks. I guess I'm enjoying the back and fourth between these two too much.

top topics

13