It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Liberals Want You to Die if You Disagree with Them

page: 12
53
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:00 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Not my mold. It was a title of the story. Go over my responses if you want, Leftist is what fits the story better than liberal, but liberals are still dangerous.




posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

I dont know where it came from. But would you dare say that isn't the new reality under this PC Identity Political (SJW) agenda?



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:05 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Yes, I will dare say it isn't real.

You can't "shame" someone into being a racist.

If that's all it takes to become racist then I'd dare say they already had the tendencies to find themselves superior.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Kali74

Most of those cute photos are fake and biased.





No.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

If I remember the story, then I would defend his right to say stupid things. I do care about Nazi (because that is the go to boogy man) rights, because my rights would be the next unpopular one to be censored.



The OP reminds me of the whingers who cried when that Nazi got punched in the head, crying about his free speech.


We don't care about a Nazi's freedom of speech, bruh.

We want to drink your tears.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: seasonal


but liberals are still dangerous.


Anyone who devoutly and blindly holds any ideology against the face of reason or truth is dangerous, yourself included.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

You seem obsessed with SJWs.

I don't pay attention to them in the slightest.



You make them sound like a large collective.
That's far from reality.


If you're a liberal whom is obsessed with Identity Politics (tribalism), and you hate/disdain white people (racist [tribalism])[especially if you're white], and you think black people (etc minorities) CANT be racist, and you're for assaulting people who dont think like you, and you're for things like censorship of stuff you dont like, etc = SJW.

I noted many occasions around the site where you struck me as not being hopelessly blind to your partisanship.

But perhaps you're still an SJW afterall?

Anyways, I can't wait for the next BLM thread to pop up and you go in there and say people should go and punch those black supremacists in the face.

edit on 11-2-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Kali74

Are you a libertarian or a leftist or a liberal?


I'm a Libertarian Socialist (Anarchist)... for your comprehension level, I'm a Leftist.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Just since this past summer, I've seen multiple threads (and beyond) clearly demonstrating every item on that list to be the new mindset.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: seasonal

If you're next in line after the Nazis you may want to rethink your ideology.

I'm not worried about my rights whatsoever if Nazi rights are removed.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:12 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss



Just because Hillary declared that any and all opponents of her, SJW's, etc are "Alt-Right" doesn't mean everyone actually follows Spencer.

Get a grip.


No u.

The irony...



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Just since this past summer, I've seen multiple threads (and beyond) clearly demonstrating every item on that list to be the new mindset.


Did those threads turn white people into racists?

Yeah sure.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Hazardous1408

If I remember the story, then I would defend his right to say stupid things. I do care about Nazi (because that is the go to boogy man) rights, because my rights would be the next unpopular one to be censored.



The OP reminds me of the whingers who cried when that Nazi got punched in the head, crying about his free speech.


We don't care about a Nazi's freedom of speech, bruh.

We want to drink your tears.



Anyone who actually wanted free expression would defend everyone's rights to free expression.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:14 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Everyone except Nazis.

F*ck Nazis.

They can be silenced and gulaged.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:15 PM
link   
I thing your title is right on target, but I certainly don't feel that way about my liberal friends. I would give them a great big conservative kiss.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

Labels, labels, labels, wow. That is quite a quasi beefed up super unique label, GOLD STAR.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408


No, it only matters who is in control to say who is the Nazi.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:17 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Anyone with half a brain realizes that there's people all over the spectrum that don't actually believe in free speech. Essentially what we have here are individual cases of human.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

That is a fascist point of reference.



posted on Feb, 11 2017 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

When one staunch tribe continuously attacks, berates, marginalizes, etc other for 'being of another tribe', it inevitably leads to tribalist solidarity backlash. That how humans are programmed, and most are completely subservient to such innateness.



new topics

top topics



 
53
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join