It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Looks like its time for Hillary Clinton to be Charged welcome Jeff Sessions

page: 2
83
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
TO set and maintain justful precedents, people need to be made example of so that others dont follow in their evil footsteps (not so readily, openly, brazenly anyways).


Precedents have already been made and we have laws/rights in place to protect American citizens from being made examples of without just cause.


Private servers in a basement with classified material on it, and lied about it with the express purpose of circumventing FOIA.

Is JUST CAUSE.




posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker

The private server that you speak of is the RNC server just as the DNC has a server (which was hacked along with Hillary`s server)and there`s no proof that trump`s people are still using the RNC server. the RNC and DNC servers are technically 'private" servers but they are both nothing like the "private" server that Hillary had in her closet.

If trump or any of his people had a "private" server tucked away in a closet and were using it, that would be a big problem.


edit on 9-2-2017 by Tardacus because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-2-2017 by Tardacus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: introvert

When ever do the criminal career politicians get jammed up?

Unless you can debunk this:
The Ties That Bind The Bush & Clinton Crime Family's: The CIA's Global Drug & Jihad Empire

You'd be the first to dare to try. And that's old stuff. The list goes on and on.


And this has to do with the topic... how, exactly?

Oh wait - it doesn't. Just more "BUT LEK AT DEZE GUIS," deflections to take the attention away from the topic.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: introvert
Precedents have already been made and we have laws/rights in place to protect American citizens from being made examples of without just cause.


There is definitely just cause to bring her to trial over her handling of classified documents.


No, there's not. We've seen the info in her case and Comey was correct that what she did would of been handled internally within the SD, not criminally-charged.


Just cause isn't up to the FBI to determine, they can make recommendations, but the decision ultimately rests with the Justice Department, INCLUDING the decision of whether the State Department already issued consequences for violations and breaches of policy (which the obviously did not).



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
TO set and maintain justful precedents, people need to be made example of so that others dont follow in their evil footsteps (not so readily, openly, brazenly anyways).


Precedents have already been made and we have laws/rights in place to protect American citizens from being made examples of without just cause.


Private servers in a basement with classified material on it, and lied about it with the express purpose of circumventing FOIA.

Is JUST CAUSE.



There is no proof she purposely lied and there is no proof of her intent to circumvent FOIA requests.

Without that proof, what case do they have?
edit on 9-2-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
TO set and maintain justful precedents, people need to be made example of so that others dont follow in their evil footsteps (not so readily, openly, brazenly anyways).


Precedents have already been made and we have laws/rights in place to protect American citizens from being made examples of without just cause.


Private servers in a basement with classified material on it, and lied about it with the express purpose of circumventing FOIA.

Is JUST CAUSE.



Case closed, folks.

Neo said so.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:11 PM
link   
As soon as one of the Congressional Committees submits proof of her perjury, the JD will act appropriately.




posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
TO set and maintain justful precedents, people need to be made example of so that others dont follow in their evil footsteps (not so readily, openly, brazenly anyways).


Precedents have already been made and we have laws/rights in place to protect American citizens from being made examples of without just cause.


Private servers in a basement with classified material on it, and lied about it with the express purpose of circumventing FOIA.

Is JUST CAUSE.



Case closed, folks.

Neo said so.


No, the law says so.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6



Just cause isn't up to the FBI to determine, they can make recommendations, but the decision ultimately rests with the Justice Department


Agreed. We now know how the DoJ approaches these sorts of cases. Intent is required.



INCLUDING the decision of whether the State Department already issued consequences for violations and breaches of policy (which the obviously did not).


True, because she no longer works for the SD.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

no they didn`t, in fact they said the opposite.

they clearly said that in the future someone who does what Hillary did shouldn`t expect to not face charges.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tardacus
a reply to: introvert

no they didn`t, in fact they said the opposite.

they clearly said that in the future someone who does what Hillary did shouldn`t expect to not face charges.



That's not what he said. He said someone that did what Hillary did would of had to face consequences. That is where the internal handling of such matter within the departments comes in to play.


“To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. Read more at: www.nationalreview.com...

edit on 9-2-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:15 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

hmmm....what do you call it when someone lies to congress???? under oath????damn it .......i think it starts with a p....

I think comey would find a prosecutor to pursue this case now.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:15 PM
link   

[pic]vi580989a1.jpg[/ pic]
"Bill Clinton Inc." (the Clinton Foundation) turns out to be a money laundering front after all

Nope, the WikiLeaks were "just a whole lot of nuthin'"!!

edit on 9-2-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:15 PM
link   


Its the Attorney General's job to uphold the Law. The AG could still follow through with Trumps promise to appoint a Special Prosecutor to look into Hillary's case. Because it's his Job not Trumps.


After the absolute snip of the last two weeks.

I think Trump does need to take the gloves off.

Prosecute Clinton, and in a single action change the narrative.

Then people can go protest CLinton being locked up.
edit on 9-2-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

we don`t know what proof they actually have, unless you believe they publicly released all the evidence that they have.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

If that's the procedure, who could have punished Bush for deleting the White House server before he left? Could have been a lot of info we could have gotten with FOIA.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




Agreed. We now know how the DoJ approaches these sorts of cases. Intent is required.
The law mentions nothing of intent when dealing with classified info. There is a much different doj now.
How did that intent argument work for the kid with the pics of his submarine?



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tardacus
a reply to: introvert

we don`t know what proof they actually have, unless you believe they publicly released all the evidence that they have.



If we don't know what proof they have, why are people calling for charges to be filed.

It doesn't make any sense.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
TO set and maintain justful precedents, people need to be made example of so that others dont follow in their evil footsteps (not so readily, openly, brazenly anyways).


Precedents have already been made and we have laws/rights in place to protect American citizens from being made examples of without just cause.


Private servers in a basement with classified material on it, and lied about it with the express purpose of circumventing FOIA.

Is JUST CAUSE.



Case closed, folks.

Neo said so.


No, the law says so.


And what law is that?

"The Law," that found Hillary innocent?

Using the state as a metric for morality is retarded.

I wish Hillary would be found guilty, but according to the law - she was found innocent.

Get over it.



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 03:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Tardacus
a reply to: introvert

we don`t know what proof they actually have, unless you believe they publicly released all the evidence that they have.



If we don't know what proof they have, why are people calling for charges to be filed.

It doesn't make any sense.


Didn't you read the memo?

ATS members are now educated as lawyers and understand this case. They just KNOW how it "really works."

# proof, they KNOW, man.



new topics

top topics



 
83
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join