It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by namehere
"Under Germany's welfare reforms, any woman under 55 who has been out of work for more than a year can be forced to take an available job – including in the sex industry – or lose her unemployment benefit. Last month German unemployment rose for the 11th consecutive month to 4.5 million, taking the number out of work to its highest since reunification in 1990."
Originally posted by FredT
*gets out crystal ball* mrwupy, my ball tells me you are a lonely man. You must be quite the player at a bar with this attitude
Originally posted by James the Lesser
I'll gladly go down on a woman for money. Most men would(unless gay, then go down on a guy or whatever) have sex for money. Why people think it is such a bad idea IDK.
Originally posted by AlwaysLearning
[quote
I cannot believe that you have two daughters and could still stay something so utterly degrading to women. Is that how little you think of them? Of women. You are one bitter man.
As soon as they're able your daughters should run as far as away from you as they can get.
Originally posted by mrwupy
At the same time, why should the state (taxpayers) have to support this woman when she actually can work and generate plenty of revenue? A woman is born with a built in ATM, all she has to do is put it on the street and the money starts rolling in.
Sex is a commodity. It can be bought and sold just like cornmeal and shares of microsoft.
Once the unemployment is gone she'll probably turn to hooking anyway. Its a sure way to fast cash.
Why shouldn't it be a job option????
Love and light
Wupy
Originally posted by Chuck Stevenson
If the man objected How would the German Government force him to service homosexuals?
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by Chuck Stevenson
If the man objected How would the German Government force him to service homosexuals?
And I suspect that muslim women would get a pass on it.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
This is a case of what is commonly called "unintended consequences." The fact is that she is not really forced to work in a brothel, but now that prostitution is legal in Germany and not considered immoral, she has been offered a legitimate job which she has refused and she finds herself in the position of losing her benefits or taking a job beneath her qualifications.
Unemployment benefits in Germany are so liberal and unemployment in so high that the program is bankrupting the government. There was a piece on the news the other day about a man who has been out of work for well over a year and their are plenty of jobs for him to take, but none pay as well as his benefits, so he refuses to work in a field other than the one in which he is trained.
In reality this woman is caught in a kind of catch 22. She can either become a prostitute or she can take a job that is not moral objectionable which will probably pay much less. During the campaign to legalize the "victimless" crime of prostitution, no one, I am sure considered that this situation would be a consequence, but now that this progressive movement has gained legality, many women will be faced with this dilemma and many I am sure who have less stringent moral standards may find themselves with a strong incentive to enter into the profession, which will no doubt lead many into a life that is fraught with all manner of pitfalls.
Originally posted by James the Lesser
With gov. controlled prostitution there are no pimps who smack their bitches, or get them addicted to drugs, so forth.
Also, how do you know that only, lets say "undesirable" women would pay a guy for sex? Maybe it would give the woman a thrill, or a way to get off without having to deal with a relationship and its problems, or make them feel better that a guy is doing that to her without her having to do anything to him she doesn't want, control and power are strong sexual pluses. Ok, book series I read, rich women use LCs, Licensed Companion, as eye candy at fancy dos, or rich men to, or someone uses them just to get off after a relationship has ended and they don't want to deal with going to a bar ar club and mess with others.
It isn't just fat or "ugly"(beauty is the eye of the beholder) women or men that use prostitutes, some use them cause it's easy, no hassle sex, or because they are in a flunk at the moment and can't pick anyone up at a club/bar, or they just broke up and don't want to date period at the moment. Also, aren't gov. prostitutes tested for drugs? So they, unlike most in America where it is illegal, can't do drugs. Also tested for STDs? SO it keeps the spread of AIDS, hepititas(sp?) syphalis, so forth. I support legal prostitution, and not just cause I am man, but it would help the women, no pimps, no drugs, and don't have to have sex with any man that walked in, have gov. standards so a crack addict can't walk in and get a hand job or something.(jumpy, skinny, bonewhite skin, tracks on their arms, easy to spot if looking)