It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Tehran - Mega Capital of Iran - Photo Album (Bush doesn't want you to see this side of Iran!)

page: 7
0
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by masterp

Originally posted by Siroos
TEHRAN PICTURES: www.worldisround.com...

IRAN PICTURES: www.worldisround.com...

Greater Tehran has become a giant metropolis of some 15 million in population. The city boasts some 800+ Parks. Construction of advanced highways, highrises, monuments, museums, is booming like never before.

[edit on 30-1-2005 by Siroos]

That will not develop into anything more than what it is for you - a wishful thinking for whatever sick reasons you may have to have such awful wishful thinkings. I wouldn't even wish such things on my enemies. How would you like to have your city bombarded to dust? And have your relatives killed? And your life shattered into pieces? Have you ever thought about that? And by the way, you can keep your stininking so called "freedom" where it belongs!

[edit on 31-1-2005 by John bull 1]


Let's keep these pictures around in order to compare them when the city is destroyed by the forces of freedom...




posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Conqueror
OK MATE,

But who made these powers? You made them didn't you?

it still deosnt justify WHAT SO EVER you going around invading countries

it is simply too much to even state in words how obsurd the goings on around the world are getting


Not really, it is just the principle of "might is right" and it has been this way forever. I didn't see you Brits complaining when you were powerful and had your empire. Who gave you the right to do that? (not blaming you or anyone else just pointing out this isn't something that is exclusive to any one country)

[edit on 31-1-2005 by Trent]



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:17 PM
link   
djohnsto77


WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THESE SET OF RULES?.....

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of
transportation and control of highways and seaports.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the
communication media.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power,
gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and
farms.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work
brigades under government supervision.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education
and welfare functions.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national
registration of all persons.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and
aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate
communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be
abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland
waterways and public storage facilities.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency
Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in
times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce
the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to
establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate
penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal
departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued
over a fifteen year period.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to
develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and
distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money
in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also
provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress
cannot review the action for six months.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12148 created the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
that is to interface with the Department of Defense for civil defense planning
and funding. An "emergency czar" was appointed. FEMA has only spent about 6
percent of its budget on national emergencies, the bulk of their funding has
been used for the construction of secret underground facilities to assure
continuity of government in case of a major emergency, foreign or domestic.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12656 appointed the National Security Council as the principal
body that should consider emergency powers. This allows the government to
increase domestic intelligence and surveillance of U.S. citizens and would
restrict the freedom of movement within the United States and granted the
government the right to isolate large groups of civilians. The National Guard
could be federalized to seal all borders and take control of U.S. air space and
all ports of entry. Many of the figures in the Iran-Contra scandal were part of
this emergency contingent, including Marine Colonel Oliver North. [2]





HMMM I WONDER HOW THOSE CAN BE USED......



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:18 PM
link   
I have to admit I was very surprised to see how "westernized" some of those pictures portray the citizens of Iran. someone(sorry for the brain freeze on your name) posted earlier about the mindset of the younger generation of Iranians & THAT is what its all about. I am encouraged by the similarities & hope that their youth and ours will make a stand against the chest pounding elitists in our respective governments.

A very sincere thanks to those who posted pics(not the b.s. KKK & Nazi garbage) and truthful info about their society!



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Trent, it says Location: London, but im not British


Anyway Qonquering the world like that was a different story belonging to a different era, but if you are trying to put it in parallel to what America is doing, then wouldn't you indirectly be saying that America is also trying to conquer?



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Conqueror
djohnsto77


WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THESE SET OF RULES?.....

...

HMMM I WONDER HOW THOSE CAN BE USED......


Most seem logical, some seem unconstitutional. An executive order has almost no legal authority outside the executive branch, certainly no legal authority restricting what Congress or the Court can do.

[edit on 1/31/2005 by djohnsto77]



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:25 PM
link   
I assure you guys that if Iran is left alone, it will find its own way to glory as a nation.

the new emerging youth generation is will create the spark for change......for the better

but no help is needed from Americans or any other aggresive outside force



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:29 PM
link   
djohnsto77


you said ALMOST no legal authority, people in power can turn the smallest window of oppurtunity into something much bigger.

and correct me if Im wrong but isnt an executive order and order that can be given exclusivly by a president in power after a large-scale event, maybe a nuke in new york or something like that?

It will in turn give government total power anyway over the people



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:30 PM
link   
If Iran is left to its own, it's going to nuke Israel and perhaps London and Paris.

Please tell me where in Executive Order 11921 limits are placed on Congress.



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Conqueror
djohnsto77


you said ALMOST no legal authority, people in power can turn the smallest window of oppurtunity into something much bigger.

and correct me if Im wrong but isnt an executive order and order that can be given exclusivly by a president in power after a large-scale event, maybe a nuke in new york or something like that?

It will in turn give government total power anyway over the people


An executive order is just an order by the President to his employees, the bureaus and agencies of the U.S. government. It can be overturned by Congress or any Federal Court.



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Conqueror
Trent, it says Location: London, but im not British


Anyway Qonquering the world like that was a different story belonging to a different era, but if you are trying to put it in parallel to what America is doing, then wouldn't you indirectly be saying that America is also trying to conquer?


You asked what gives them the right to invade countries. I gave the answer of "might is right" and that is the way it has always been (I don't like it but that's the way it is), the only parallel i was drawing is in the past other powerful nations have never needed to ask others for the right to invade another country. All the "right" you need is to have enough "might" so that no one can stop you.



[edit on 31-1-2005 by Trent]



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:37 PM
link   
djohnsto77, you talked about only 1 executive order that is hand-picked to suit your argument. most of them are just daunting to look at (If you look at it unbiasly off course).


Why would Iran nuke london or Paris, or even israel for that matter

firstly the mullahs are so greedy and power hungry and no matter how nuts they are they know they are in a tense situation, they won't even dream of nuking ANYWHERE how do you reach thoughts like this????

Secondly, if the mullahs are really in fact religous fanatics and actually stand for the RHETORICS they say in speeches then nuking israel would be a great "sin" for them. Learn religous history and you will know what Iam talking about. Israel is sakred for the muslims too, not just jews and christians.



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:39 PM
link   
Trent are you for war against Iran?



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Conqueror
Trent are you for war against Iran?


I too think they can progress without the intervention of foriegn powers, so I'm against any war. The most i would support is strikes on their nuclear facilities but think that might be a bit risky and could start a war rather than postpone one.

[edit on 31-1-2005 by Trent]



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Conqueror
djohnsto77, you talked about only 1 executive order that is hand-picked to suit your argument. most of them are just daunting to look at (If you look at it unbiasly off course).


Why would Iran nuke london or Paris, or even israel for that matter

firstly the mullahs are so greedy and power hungry and no matter how nuts they are they know they are in a tense situation, they won't even dream of nuking ANYWHERE how do you reach thoughts like this????

Secondly, if the mullahs are really in fact religous fanatics and actually stand for the RHETORICS they say in speeches then nuking israel would be a great "sin" for them. Learn religous history and you will know what Iam talking about. Israel is sakred for the muslims too, not just jews and christians.


They'd love to nuke Tel Aviv, just read Siroos's posts! They make the best argument ever! He/she's advocating nuclear weapons and threatening Israel. I know they'd be unlikely to hit Jerusalem but Tel Aviv is a fair target for them.



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 04:45 PM
link   
ok Find me a post where Siroos is implying that, and I will answer you tommorow morning. It is bed time for me now. I have school tommorow.



posted on Feb, 1 2005 @ 01:12 AM
link   
still, if Iran really wanted to nuke London, Paris, Tel Aviv AND Jerusalem it isnt our fight. I feel we(the U.S.) are overstepping our bounds here. we should aid our allies if and when they are attacked but let them handle their own foreign policy up to that point. just my opinion anyway...



posted on Feb, 1 2005 @ 01:29 AM
link   
Holy Crap,

I only read the first couple pageswaaaay to long.

I'll get to the point,

First, Yall can post all the Iranian baby pics ya want..aint gonna make a difference. I think it sucks that people don't see who truely is to to blame if these 'modern' cities, and Iranian babies get killed by a U.S. invasion.

The Iranian Government is World known to sponser terrorism...they oppress their propective people, and they have called for the destruction of Isreal and the U.S.......So blame them!!


Maybe the Iranian people need to put Foot to Ass and tell their government that they're tired of the crap...that they have a right to be human beings and have a voice.



posted on Feb, 1 2005 @ 07:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by djohnsto77
If Iran is left to its own, it's going to nuke Israel and perhaps London and Paris.

Please tell me where in Executive Order 11921 limits are placed on Congress.


That's ridiculous! Is it Iran which has used two nuclear bombs so far or the U.S.? Is it Iran who has invaded Iraq or the U.S.? Is it Iran who has bombed country after country (Too many to remember) or the U.S.? Is is Iran who has conspired against foreign governments and heads of state many times and supported and arranged coups in other countries or the U.S.? Iran has not bothered any country. Iran opposes Israel because of its agressions against a defenseless people whose land they have taken. But Iran has never engaged in any agressions against other countries whatsoever. It is the U.S. which is the biggest agressor in the world today. The U.S. is the biggest threat to world peace, and the citizens of many countries in Europe have expressed the same view in several opinion polls. The world must unite against the U.S. agression before it's too late, before a devastating nuclear war will ruin much of the world!



posted on Feb, 1 2005 @ 07:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by HardCore American

First, Yall can post all the Iranian baby pics ya want..aint gonna make a difference. I think it sucks that people don't see who truely is to to blame if these 'modern' cities, and Iranian babies get killed by a U.S. invasion.


The only people to blame for the death and destruction will be the US and Israel if they decide to attack Iran.



The Iranian Government is World known to sponser terrorism...they oppress their propective people,


Iran is no more of a state sponsor of terorism than the US has been.
The people in those photos of Iran didn't look to oppressed.
That was the purpose of the photos, to show you that iran is not like the media has portrayed it to be.
Surely you of all people knows how biased the mainstream media can be.

[edit on 1-2-2005 by AceOfBase]




top topics



 
0
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join