It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: gladtobehere
I mean, they will stop eventually, right?
Yes, unless Trump continues to give people a reason to protest.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: gladtobehere
I mean, they will stop eventually, right?
Yes, unless Trump continues to give people a reason to protest.
IMO, you cannot justify a false equivalence with an illogical fallacy - the reality is, is that snowflakes use Trump as an excuse to be offended by things that they have previously tolerated and even encouraged when a black liberal POTUS took the same actions.
Because I've decided that whats good for the goose is good for the gander
then effective immediately, his skin color and just his very existence offends me and when I'm offended I expect everyone to change to suit me - just like what the libtards expect.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: gladtobehere
I mean, they will stop eventually, right?
Yes, unless Trump continues to give people a reason to protest.
WHAT ?
The guy wasn't even elected president and people were protesting.
originally posted by: ausername
a reply to: Byrd
I wonder if there will ever be a time when people will be able to remove partisan blinders and honestly answer one question...
Is any form of tyranny imposed on a free people in a free country more or less tolerable when imposed by powers on the left or the right?
Without the words "it depends" anywhere in the answer.
originally posted by: Caver78
May I just say. I learned something today.
Did you know there are Non-profit organizations that pay to send people to these protests, pay their bail and also credit them with "hours worked" if they miss a day at the office because, you know they were jail, for these protests?
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Sublimecraft
The true story of Trump and Mar-a-Lago:
How Trump Fought Antisemitism and Racism in Palm Beach Two Decades Ago
The WSJ story that is linked focuses on the battles Trump faced as a new arrival to Palm Beach, including his new competition with the social clubs of the old order. The story, which quotes Abe Foxman, the longtime head of the Anti-Defamation League, says, in part, the following:
Mr. Trump also has resorted to the courts to secure his foothold here, and many residents wince at the attention his legal battles with the town have drawn — to the town in general, and to the admission practices at some of Palm Beach’s older clubs in particular.
…The culture clash began to approach a climax last fall, when Mr. Trump’s lawyer sent members of the town council a copy of the film “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner,” a film that deals with upper-class racism. Mr. Trump then approached the town council about lifting the restrictions that had been placed on the club. He also asked some council members not to vote on the request because their membership in other clubs created a conflict of interest.
Last December, after the council refused to lift the restrictions, Mr. Trump filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Palm Beach, alleging that the town was discriminating against Mar-a-Lago, in part because it is open to Jews and African-Americans. The suit seeks $100 million in damages.
originally posted by: hellobruce
People were protesting against Obama for 8 years, including over 200 failed court cases.
But now Trump is president, and we have seen what a delicate snowflake he is protests should not be allowed?