It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Catholic Nun Perfectly Explains the Hypocrisy of the "Pro-Life" Argument

page: 2
127
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Not your business.

Every time you choose to repeatedly address me.




posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee

So at month 9 women can abort their babies in your view. Got it.


Not your business.


Nope, the choice isn't the living babies, either. Sad.


Business of person responsible for a minimum of the next 18 years.

Not your business.


I'm responsible for plenty of underage children via tax payments already. Why is this different?



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Throes

Because there's no compromise with that kind. No meeting in the middle. No morality. Nothing but fallacious logic. Total hypocrisy (the purest in the history of the human race). No integrity in their moral compass. Etc.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee

So at month 9 women can abort their babies in your view. Got it.


Not your business.


Nope, the choice isn't the living babies, either. Sad.


Business of person responsible for a minimum of the next 18 years.

Not your business.


I'm responsible for plenty of underage children via tax payments already. Why is this different?


I am a major supporter of LIVING CHILDREN.

Did any one of them ask to be here?

Is any child responsible for irresponsible parenting?

NO.

They become part of the "village" at first breath outside the womb.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee

At what month (1-9) is an abortion cutoff acceptable to (any of) you?


What does the law of the land Roe V Wade say? That's what's acceptable to me. What about you?



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

When a 9 month old fetus is a BABY, and se half the population says we should be able to chop them out and KILL them (BABIES), it should be everybodys business if that's the kind of barbaric society we want to be.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

They become part of the "village" at first breath outside the womb.


Can you describe for us the process of terminating a late term baby before it has the chance to draw breath?



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Annee

They become part of the "village" at first breath outside the womb.


Can you describe for us the process of terminating a late term baby before it has the chance to draw breath?


What is late term? Can you describe the circumstances that would encourage a physician to provide a late term abortion?



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Annee

They become part of the "village" at first breath outside the womb.


Can you describe for us the process of terminating a late term baby before it has the chance to draw breath?


Yes.

First pregnancy was a spontaneous abortion at 4 months.

Followed by 2 living children.

Followed by an elective abortion.

I chose the welfare of my 2 living children over adding another mouth to feed.

I have never regretted my decision.

When I made the decision is not relevant.


edit on 4-2-2017 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

I didn't ask you personal baby making history.

I asked how a 'scientist' could actually manage to abort a late term baby and extinguish its life before it has a chance to draw breath.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee

So at month 9 women can abort their babies in your view. Got it.


Not your business.


You think a woman should be allowed to terminate a baby at 9 months and its no one elses business.

That is disgusting.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Southern Guardian

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee

At what month (1-9) is an abortion cutoff acceptable to (any of) you?


As for WHEN abortions should be legal. It's HER body. She needs to question her own morality.


Ah, The Great Lie again! It's NOT HER BODY. It's the baby's body. SHE is the landlady who signed a nine month lease. Pregnancies aren't "accidents." They reflect a lack of planning. Nowhere else in the law can a landlady terminate a lease by killing the tenant. After that 9 month lease is up she can do what she wants, including give the baby up. She's not obligated to raise it. This idea that it is "her body" is self-indulgent crap.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: schuyler

'Accidents' do happen,....no contraceptive is 100%



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Annee

They become part of the "village" at first breath outside the womb.


Can you describe for us the process of terminating a late term baby before it has the chance to draw breath?


What is late term? Can you describe the circumstances that would encourage a physician to provide a late term abortion?


Why don't you ask Annee? She feels that a mother has every right to terminate at nine months, and no one, not law makers, not doctors, not fathers, have the right to tell her that she can't terminate at none months.

And of course, she is getting people starring this claim.

So would you like to comment on that? Surely you think this is one of the most disgusting comments you have ever heard.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: JD163

It's called pulling out.

Or better yet, no sex during ovulation. And dont tell me there's no way of telling if when its ovulation time.
www.whattoexpect.com...



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

In fact, I would like to delve deeper into your argument that a woman has every right to abort at 9 months.

All science, even those on the left, would agree that at 9 months the fetus is a full grown baby. This is undebateable.

Yet you believe that the woman has the right to end that baby for any reason, because it still affects her body. Now keep in mind you are not saying in cases were the woman life is in jeopardy from birth, you are saying the woamn has the right to do it for whatever reason she wants.

This justifies the most heinous type of violence, degradation and selfishness the world has ever seen.

This mentality permeates into all areas of life.

Why stop at the womb? We know at 9 months its a baby, yet for the convenience of the mother it can be terminated.

If the woman is responsible for the child after its born, why shouldn't she then have the right to terminate say a one week old. After all, that one week old is still a burden on her, and her body.

There is almost no biolgical difference between a one week old out of the womb and a nine month old in the womb, so if the woman can terminate the latter for her convenience, why not the former?

And this can be said in every aspect of life.

Perhaps the woman feels that Muslims endanger her life. Well to protect her body, wouldn't she have every right to kill Muslims? And so on.

Annee I have enjoyed our conversations here. And i am open to a reaonable discussion on abortion. I assure you, if a pro life person was on here saying life begins at conception, I would say thats ridiculous.

But your claim that even a nine year old can be aborted on any whim from the mother is one of the most disgusting, dangerous comments I have ever heard.

You are doing nothing but driving any reasonable person as far as possible from your argument.

I truly hope you rethink your argument and come to a more sane conclusion.
edit on 4-2-2017 by Grambler because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:47 PM
link   
Ever other day of the week we hear that separation of church and state.

Until comes along a nun that agrees with their political ideology.

Yeah there is some perfect hypocrisy here.
edit on 4-2-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler



So would you like to comment on that


Not really. I'd like an answer to my questions to Ignoranceisbliss, though.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Grambler



So would you like to comment on that


Not really. I'd like an answer to my questions to Ignoranceisbliss, though.



Thats fine.

But I wonder why you would hesitate to call out such a gross and heinous statement as that (I hope you weren't one of the ones that starred this comment)?

If you are unwilling to call out the most extreme position possible on this issue, how can anyone even have a base for which to begin discussing this complicated issue with you?



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: JD163
a reply to: schuyler

'Accidents' do happen,....no contraceptive is 100%


Abstinence is quite effective.




top topics



 
127
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join