It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Numerous celebrities and media figures complained on Twitter about MILO’s book deal, including Sarah Silverman, who posted: “The guy has freedom of speech but to fund him & give him a platform tells me a LOT about @simonschuster YUCK AND BOO AND GROSS.” The Chicago Review of Books also announced that they would boycott every book from publisher Simon and Schuster in 2017 as a protest against MILO’s book being published.
originally posted by: heyguysimashill
a reply to: TheBulk
He's just a troll. A talented one, but a troll nonetheless. He's very good at getting under people's skin, but seems to have no interest in real debate.
originally posted by: heyguysimashill
a reply to: TheBulk
He's just a troll. A talented one, but a troll nonetheless. He's very good at getting under people's skin, but seems to have no interest in real debate.
originally posted by: the owlbear
I don't know who is worse. The people protesting against the troll or those who support him and believe what he says.
Both groups are extremists and people that I try to avoid on a daily basis.
That's why fights break out wherever he goes. He's trying to pick them by being inflammatory.
When will people wake up and see that's just what the establishment wants? Perpetual conflict between ideologies. More money that way.
Both Breitbart and HuffPo profit from the clicks for nickels when he trolls in person. Not to mention the msm. And any other website that either supports or is opposed to his act.
His other books have less than 600 reviews so he has a hardcore group of loyal fans. That might sound like a lot, but in contrast, J.K. Rowling has over 5,000 reviews for most of her books,
originally posted by: heyguysimashill
a reply to: TheBulk
He's purposefully incendiary. The offended reactions he gets out of his opponents help to further his "liberal snowflakes" narrative. Anyone who doesn't live in troll mode has topics that make them emotional—it's just human nature. Exploiting that to "win" an argument is incredibly immature.
originally posted by: the owlbear
I don't know who is worse. The people protesting against the troll or those who support him and believe what he says.
Both groups are extremists and people that I try to avoid on a daily basis.
That's why fights break out wherever he goes. He's trying to pick them by being inflammatory.
When will people wake up and see that's just what the establishment wants? Perpetual conflict between ideologies. More money that way.
Both Breitbart and HuffPo profit from the clicks for nickels when he trolls in person. Not to mention the msm. And any other website that either supports or is opposed to his act.