It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White House Backs Away From Promised Voter Fraud Investigation

page: 3
39
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Is Christian Science Monitor a better source for you?
As White House backs down on voter fraud, debate far from over




posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Exactly right. Not only that, but those mocking Trump for wanting an investigation, which would only prove him wrong if they were correct, is absurd. If they are so cocksure there should be no problem with investigating the matter for the sake of truth. In fact, they should be begging him to do an investigation.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:35 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Except for that "waste of tax money" thing that you want to ignore. I don't need or desire to waste tax money on an investigation I'm already sure of the answer.
edit on 3-2-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Grambler

Is Christian Science Monitor a better source for you?
As White House backs down on voter fraud, debate far from over


That source is much better actually. It too says an investigation may or may not happen, just that it is not a priority now.

But it uses words like unsubstantiated instead of claiming Trump made it up.

It then gives both sides on rather or not there should be stricter voter controls. This is much better journalism.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

You should have just cited the original CNN article instead of finding articles that agree with you. None of the articles you've posted mentioned this part of the original CNN article:


"At the time, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said the President "got jammed up on some meetings that needed to occur."

Spicer said the order would be signed in the next day or two.

One aide said the President is waiting until Sen. Jeff Sessions is confirmed as attorney general before launching an investigation. But others inside the West Wing hope the President doesn't pursue it, CNN has learned.
"I think there will be something signed," one senior administration said, "but I don't think it will be now.""



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t




Except for that "waste of tax money" thing that you want to ignore. I don't need or desire to waste tax money on an investigation I'm already sure of the answer.


I want to ignore waste of tax money? This from a big government socialist...



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Except for that "waste of tax money" thing that you want to ignore. I don't need or desire to waste tax money on an investigation I'm already sure of the answer.


I love the fact that so many on the left are now interested in wasting tax money.

Where were you when Obama was spending 10 trillion, including half a billion on a failed comapany like Solyndra, or giving billions to Iran?



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:40 PM
link   


One senior administration official told CNN that while such an investigation could happen in the future, it was no longer a priority.

Hahahaha
When are you people going to quit believing the fake news?
Until it is repeated by a named source from the current administration, chances are it's fake.
When are the journalists going to be held accountable for making this # up?



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: Krazysh0t

How can you say with every rational bone in your body that voter fraud is a non issue? I give you more credit than that..

You are essentially saying the integrity of the voting process doesn't matter...

Easy. Like so: Voter fraud is a non-issue. See?


You could've just said

"I'm biased and I don't care"

And you would be saying the exact same thing..



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Well it would never have been a white house investigation it would have had to been a congregational investigation. So obviously saying the white house isnt doing it is well stupid really.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Krazysh0t

So if he went through with it, you would have had a problem with it, and since he isn't going through with it, ....you have a problem with it.

What a sad way to live.


It's mind boggling really.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: Krazysh0t




One senior administration official told CNN

And here we go again , CNN afraid to put names to a source . Who is their source ? Where do they get them, ? My guess , the restroom in the step and fetch it on the corner.


Since when does CNN need to provide sources? Their entire viewer base is liberal, why should CNN even bother. Its much easier to drive their agenda when they have full artistic freedom given to them by their viewer base.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Krazysh0t




Except for that "waste of tax money" thing that you want to ignore. I don't need or desire to waste tax money on an investigation I'm already sure of the answer.


I want to ignore waste of tax money? This from a big government socialist...

You are the one who is wanting to waste our tax money on an investigation the left doesn't want to do regardless of my political leanings. Clearly Socialists aren't alone in desiring to waste tax money huh?



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Except for that "waste of tax money" thing that you want to ignore. I don't need or desire to waste tax money on an investigation I'm already sure of the answer.


I love the fact that so many on the left are now interested in wasting tax money.

Where were you when Obama was spending 10 trillion, including half a billion on a failed comapany like Solyndra, or giving billions to Iran?


I'd rather our government spend money on green energy to bridge our society into the coming technological future instead of wasting it on a partisan attack investigation. Also, that money we gave Iran wasn't tax money. It was Iran's money.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: Krazysh0t

How can you say with every rational bone in your body that voter fraud is a non issue? I give you more credit than that..

You are essentially saying the integrity of the voting process doesn't matter...

Easy. Like so: Voter fraud is a non-issue. See?


You could've just said

"I'm biased and I don't care"

And you would be saying the exact same thing..

I could also post tons of evidence showing how voter fraud is near non-existent in the country and none of you would accept it anyways. So why bother? Simple dismissal is much easier and the same outcome of you ignoring my opinion will happen anyways.
edit on 3-2-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Except for that "waste of tax money" thing that you want to ignore. I don't need or desire to waste tax money on an investigation I'm already sure of the answer.


I love the fact that so many on the left are now interested in wasting tax money.

Where were you when Obama was spending 10 trillion, including half a billion on a failed comapany like Solyndra, or giving billions to Iran?


I'd rather our government spend money on green energy to bridge our society into the coming technological future instead of wasting it on a partisan attack investigation. Also, that money we gave Iran wasn't tax money. It was Iran's money.


How could investigating the very voting system that makes the country what it is be a waste of money?
What if you are wrong, and there is voter fraud?
What are your credentials that allow you to determine there is no voter fraud?



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:25 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

I never said there was no voting fraud. I said it was a non-issue.

Evidence
edit on 3-2-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t



You are the one who is wanting to waste our tax money on an investigation the left doesn't want to do regardless of my political leanings. Clearly Socialists aren't alone in desiring to waste tax money huh?


Only until after the investigation is concluded can it be known if it was a waste or not, but it seems discounting efforts before they even occur and the results are manifest is the going rate for you. I'm fully willing to admit that, upon investigation, whether it was a waste or not. You have it pinned as a waste before it even happens.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Because there is no compelling reason to carry out the investigation other than a hurt idiot's ego or as a partisan attack on the left. We are already going to see a new era of voter suppression laws from the right, do you guys really need the cherry on top?



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Because there is no compelling reason to carry out the investigation on Trump other than a hurt idiot's ego or as a partisan attack on the Right


See, that becomes a very profound sentiment when you look at it from our view with all these "compelling" and "important" issues being brought up daily on Trump..

And no this is not an attack at you, just yet another dynamic of hypocrisy that takes place...




top topics



 
39
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join