It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
These people exhibiting the bad behavior are as far from liberals as one can get.
.....
It was the duty of the University and City police to keep the peace, to keep people from being beaten senseless in the streets. If they didn't do their duty, it is on their head. That is not to say that the peaceful protestors didn't have an obligation to leave immediately when the troublemakers showed up and started their game of vandalism and beating people with sticks.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: desert
The anarchists in black who intentionally destroy property (Bannon BTW fancies himself an anarchist of govt) need to be held accountable. What I find disturbing for America was Trump's impulsive tweet right after, "If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view - NO FEDERAL FUNDS?" This is so Nixonian, wanting to use govt power to take away from citizens not involved. No investigation, just threat of action. An American Reichstag would be easy with a Trump.
Berkeley has Republican/conservative students.
There have been Republican/conservative speakers at Berkeley with no issues.
Milo has an agenda. He is an antagonist. He's like the guy who yells fire in a crowded theater just to get a reaction.
Is it really free speech? Or is his intent to push buttons and cause a backlash?
I have ZERO sympathy for Milo.
Been there.
It is interesting you have mentioned about govt infiltrators with meetings/demonstrations. In matters involving protesting corporations (pollution, etc.), there can be people hired by the corporation to infiltrate meetings and peaceful protests.
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Grambler
You left out Don Rickles.
I really don't see any comparison between Milo and that list.
Milo, a gay man, specifically targets women and sensitive women's issues.
Why?
Let me know when he "man's up".
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Grambler
You left out Don Rickles.
I really don't see any comparison between Milo and that list.
Milo, a gay man, specifically targets women and sensitive women's issues.
Why?
Let me know when he "man's up".
Rickles is great!
But you are coming off as quite hypocritical. I have hear Rickles make rape jokes at womens expense. But its cool for him for you, because you don't mind his politics.
You have shown you have no evidence of Milo ever threatening violence or censorshi[ toward people. Now you have shown that its not his jokes that bother you.
Its become clear; you objection to Milo is that he brings up facts against the cult of modern feminism. You can't leave him speak, because his facts point out the hatred and lies of this cult.
He uses humor sure, and is a troll, but its the facts he has, like how the wage gap is a myth, how women severely outpace men in secondary education, how the rape culture is a myth, how much violence the Feminists movement uses against men; this is why you hate Milo.
You sound like a white racist in the 70's saying they can't leave their children see Richard Pryor, or they might realize racism is nonsense. Not a good look for you.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Grambler
You left out Don Rickles.
I really don't see any comparison between Milo and that list.
Milo, a gay man, specifically targets women and sensitive women's issues.
Why?
Let me know when he "man's up".
Rickles is great!
But you are coming off as quite hypocritical. I have hear Rickles make rape jokes at womens expense. But its cool for him for you, because you don't mind his politics.
You have shown you have no evidence of Milo ever threatening violence or censorshi[ toward people. Now you have shown that its not his jokes that bother you.
Its become clear; you objection to Milo is that he brings up facts against the cult of modern feminism. You can't leave him speak, because his facts point out the hatred and lies of this cult.
He uses humor sure, and is a troll, but its the facts he has, like how the wage gap is a myth, how women severely outpace men in secondary education, how the rape culture is a myth, how much violence the Feminists movement uses against men; this is why you hate Milo.
You sound like a white racist in the 70's saying they can't leave their children see Richard Pryor, or they might realize racism is nonsense. Not a good look for you.
So, you're comparing saterist comedians to what Milo does?
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Grambler
I'm over it.
Said what I had to say.
Global top 150 Universities by employability ...no Berkeley
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: khnum
No.
Glasses won't correct for confirmation bias.