It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: StrizzMatik
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: StrizzMatik
Truth like the fact that you have no formal legal knowledge and your entire opinion is based on right wing propaganda?
You need literally zero knowledge about law to understand that the dissemination of classified information is a felony crime. And I guess you missed the part where I said I wasn't a Democrat or Republican, nor did I vote for Trump, so here's your low-hanging fruit buddy, you earned it. I'm surprised you didn't call me a racist for no reason, progress!
Oh please. Your entire opinion is based on right wing nonsense. Only the right wing believes she is guilty. So if you are repeating this tripe then you are being influenced by right wing propaganda. It has nothing to do with your party (which I didn't assume) or who you voted for (which I also didn't assume).
Your lack of legal knowledge is also on display by your assertion that you need zero legal knowledge to determine Hillary's guilt.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: StrizzMatik
Nice fallacy buzzword checklist you got running there. I wonder if you know what any of them mean. Especially since you engaged in an ad hominem of your own in that post making you a hypocrite.
As for refuting you. Why? You don't care about my opinion anways and nothing I will say or show you will change your mind. Your mind is already made up (because of that right wing propaganda) and your mind couldn't be anymore closed here.
I mean if Comey's own words not to indict isn't good enough for you, then you don't care about truth. Only getting your agenda.
PS: I don't vet other people's claims. It's a pet peeve of mine. So I won't be doing your Google work for you.
The fact they feared Hillary so much - - is telling.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: damwel
You mean something like knowingly mishandling classified information?
Like lying to Congress?
Like selling influence to foreign governments?
Like conspiracy to commit election fraud?
Like providing material support to terrorists?
All of which there is actual evidence of?
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: hellobruce
Benghazi
Exactly what crime that is a jailable offence did she commit with that?
18 USC 1621
18 USC 1001 for her testimony,
The entire thing about the Youtube video were laughable bull#, seriously.
there's also a likely culpable negligence charge for calling off the cavalry and letting them die, although that one will require shaking a lot of trees, still, she's responsible.
emailgate
Exactly what crime that is a jailable offence did she commit with that?
18 usc 794. She says she was never read onto anything, utter bollocks. You get 794 any time you first receive TS info.
funding Islamic terrorism
Exactly what crime that is a jailable offence did she commit with that, and where is the evidence??
18 USC 2339B.
on and on and on
Pretty much every one of these has a real live felony attached if you can get enough proof, and some of them don't take much. If Trump wants to press it, she will be breaking big rocks into little ones before the year is up.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: StrizzMatik
Nice fallacy buzzword checklist you got running there. I wonder if you know what any of them mean. Especially since you engaged in an ad hominem of your own in that post making you a hypocrite.
As for refuting you. Why? You don't care about my opinion anways and nothing I will say or show you will change your mind. Your mind is already made up (because of that right wing propaganda) and your mind couldn't be anymore closed here.
I mean if Comey's own words not to indict isn't good enough for you, then you don't care about truth. Only getting your agenda.
PS: I don't vet other people's claims. It's a pet peeve of mine. So I won't be doing your Google work for you.
originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Hillary's criminal conduct is not even remotely defendable.
Go ask anyone with TS clearance. If they were in the same situation, there would be no hope of avoiding serious jail time or worse. It's such basic common knowledge in the security field.
Comey acted on his own for whatever reason. It certainly wasn't for lack of sufficient edivence though.
originally posted by: ColdChillin
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Wet Works
This isn't right wing propaganda. They are talking about assassination. That's what wet works IS.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Nice strawman you are trying to erect there by taking my words out of context.
originally posted by: ColdChillin
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Research Spetsbureau 13.