It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Fires Acting Attorney General

page: 19
77
<< 16  17  18   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 1 2017 @ 10:19 PM
link   
a reply to: AMPTAH

The AG is required to represent the US government in legal matters and is required to comply with EO's.

The AAG's own staff signed off on the EO as lawful and constitutional. The judges ruling and the AAG's opinion arent the same thing and dont agree with each other, contrary to your claims.
edit on 1-2-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 1 2017 @ 10:19 PM
link   
a reply to: AMPTAH

Oh, lord, the judge didn't do anything that was not already part of the original EO, valid visas where accepted., the EO is still enforced, suspension of new visas.

Another activist judge trying to get a spot in the media.




posted on Feb, 1 2017 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

And the media keep confusing the misinformed with more misinformation.

Pity.

And now the democrats are bringing their frog king Obama to make the misinformed think that we got two presidents.

They are a dying party and they most be on life support to do that.



posted on Feb, 2 2017 @ 09:10 AM
link   
a reply to: the2ofusr1

Amen. If you don't follow the law, you have no business in the position of Attorney General.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:31 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 04:10 AM
link   
a reply to: marg6043

The Democrats dont care about the damage they are causing to themselves because they are to arrogant to realize it.

They want to undermine Trump anyway they can and dont realize its blowing up in their face.

The Democrats mindset is this - if we tear the place down maybe the people will rehire us to rebuild it.


A good read -
The Party of Outrage -
Democrats can barely keep up with their problems with Trump, raising some to wonder if their perpetual opposition is undermining a more focused message.

edit on 3-2-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 05:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Remember when it was the Republican Party that was the "Party of No?"



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

How did that work out for them?



new topics

top topics



 
77
<< 16  17  18   >>

log in

join