It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Damiel
a reply to: Kharron
Unless local state security deems otherwise (public disruption, public danger, urban trouble ... the list is endless)
originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: Mike Stivic
So with all of us shareholders in America and him making the business a part of American government in effect by not relinquishing them, is there any way this could become a legal challenge?
Also, anyone know if people can now protest in front of a private business if that business belongs to the head of the government?
an indefinite peaceful protest can be staged in front of all his businesses, concurrently, even if they obstruct profit, up to the point he decides to relinquish them, correct?
originally posted by: Mike Stivic
originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: Mike Stivic
So with all of us shareholders in America and him making the business a part of American government in effect by not relinquishing them, is there any way this could become a legal challenge?
Also, anyone know if people can now protest in front of a private business if that business belongs to the head of the government?
People can lawfully protest anywhere they want as long as they have a permit if required..
Respectfully,
~meathead
"by not relinquishing"
"private business"
"belongs to the head of the government?"
This topic came up today in a conversation...
shareholders in his businesses?
Also, anyone know if people can now protest
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Kharron
sigh...what is ATS coming to? A new convoluted thread over nothing every 5 minutes on ATS. No substance, just musings, looking for tenuous connections.