The Hypocrisy of the left on Muslim ban - democrats supported it in 2015

a reply to: xuenchen

Vett the Visas !!

Why not? It's only taxpayer money, not Trump's.

a reply to: angryproctologist

Still I would rather post facts / call them out than let it go. Those members you refer to undermine their own credibility with their posts and people will take that into account accordingly. For everyone else they are free to take the info and come to their own conclusions.

Who will be this generation's Pastor Martin Niemöller?

a reply to: Leonidas

Since no one is coming for anyone my answer to your question would be no one since its not needed.

Before the election they called Trump and his supporters racists for wanting immigration laws enforced.

Now that it is proven to be overwhelmingly popular, they are claiming proudly that Obama deported more illegalls than any other president.

It is hilarious.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

and even that claim about Obama was a lie. They changed the way deportations were tabulated, artificially inflating the numbers.

Wrong thread.

Delete.

a reply to: Moresby

So you say Trump is an agent of a foreign power yet your ok with a foreigner leading the country if his name is Obama.

It makes absolutely no sense since both examples are one in the same.

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
they are claiming proudly that Obama deported more illegalls than any other president.

You know Trump has this obvious thing about bigger numbers than 0bama. You know the left has a penchant for exaggeration. Doesn't bode well for Ahmed and Juan ... but it'll all be blamed on conservatives.

Watching the news right now.

People are protesting because "this move will anger ISIS and it is a war-like move to the extremist group and puts us all at risk."


SMGDH

a reply to: Xcathdra

People are either part of the problem or part of the solution. You have made your stand clear.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: AboveBoard
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Didnt read it did you?

and bar those from Iraq, Syria, Iran and the Sudan, or those who have visited those countries in the last five years, from traveling to the United States without a visa.

bar those from iraq, syria, iran and sudan. It would ban people who visited those countries in the last 5 years from coming to the US without a visa.

The ban for the 4 countries is the same as trumps.

YES I did read it - AND you are not seeing what is right in front of your own eyes!!! "bar those...without a visa" meaning those who were on the "visa waiver" - a "waiver" being something that means YOU DON"T HAVE TO HAVE IT.

NOW everyone is barred - EVEN THOSE WITH VISAS. EVEN THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN VETTED.

A reminder that this is NOT the Mud Pit.

Posts will be removed as deemed appropriate. Posts removed as political trollery automatically count as TWO warnings.

As usual, do NOT reply to this post.

Trump is definitely trolling Obama and the Dems by actually enacting their policies.

Epic – Is Team Trump Baiting Liberal Media and Refugee Protesters By Using Obama’s Own Policy?…

Why would the text of President Trump’s Executive Order suspending travel visas be readily available on CNN (HERE), New York Times (HERE), Wall Street Journal (HERE), but not on White House page (HERE)?

I don’t think it’s accidental. The limiting Visa program was President Obama’s action, not President Trump.

If you review the actual text of the executive order (copied below in full) what you will immediately notice is the order doesn’t specify ANY countries to be included in the Visa suspension (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen).

President Trump is not suspending visas from countries his team selected, they are simply suspending visa approval from countries President Obama selected. Additionally, Trump is suspending ALL visa applications from those countries – nothing to do with Muslim applications.


theconservativetreehouse.com...-12779 8

a reply to: AboveBoard

Vetted under the "old" rules.

They're double checking everything

And I'm not convinced all of these "reports" are verified either.

We need to wait for official government sources.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

The IRONY is blistering.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AboveBoard

Vetted under the "old" rules.

They're are double checking everything

And I'm not convinced all of these "reports" are verified either.

We need to wait for official government sources.

Ok. Here you go. "The Process for Vetting Refugees for Entrance to the United States"

LINK