It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) -- A B-52 Stratofortress from the 96th Bomb Squadron at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, is undergoing Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance testing in the Benefield Anechoic Facility (BAF) here.
The test was requested by the B-52 Program Office at Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, to comply with a recent mandate from the Air Force Safety Office according to members of the 772nd Test Squadron who oversee BAF operations. The mandate states all Air Force weapons platforms will conduct Electromagnetic Environmental Effects evaluations. This test with the B-52 concentrated on the HERO element.
Ordnance and other devices that contain electro–explosive devices must function in their operational electromagnetic environment without inadvertently activating. To prevent the susceptibility of ordnance to radiated or conducted electromagnetic energy, HERO limits are imposed. HERO tests are conducted to classify the ordnance's susceptibility to electromagnetic radiation as HERO Safe, HERO Susceptible, or HERO Unsafe.
“The advantage of using the BAF chamber allows for more sensitive measurements with low background noise levels, as compared to testing on the flightline where there are numerous interfering radio frequency sources,” said Hannah Dahlgren, the 772nd TS project lead engineer. Since no signals escape the chamber, the customer does not have to deal with regulatory clearances to radiate from the aircraft, which typically results in transmitting late at night only to avoid interfering with flightline and commercial operations.”
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: FredT
Yeah it would be. Obviously there would be differences, but I'd be really curious how much difference the airframe makes.
originally posted by: FredT
Interesting to say the least. I know they test airframes for EMP out in New Mexico, but I never thought about testing the weapons themselves on the air frame.
It would be interesting to see the differences between external and internal weapons.
originally posted by: FredT
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: FredT
Yeah it would be. Obviously there would be differences, but I'd be really curious how much difference the airframe makes.
Im curious myself. Given that planes can withstand a lightning strike (4-5 billion jules) I wonder if the frame acts as sort of a default faraday cage and routes the energy around the internal weapons?