It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
a reply to: Aazadan
Just watched Trump on Hannity, he reiterated that The Wall is going to be a real wall, like the wall Israel has, he called it the blueprint for our wall. So far Trump has done what he said he was going to do, if it is at all possible, The Wall will be built, not just a continuation of a worthless fence. Maybe it just won't be possible to build The Wall, but you can be sure Trump will do everything he can to get a real wall built.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Aazadan
I think something no one has considered: American ranchers own land on both sides of the border, and they cross over regularly doing their work on their land. To them, there is no border.
There are fences along much of the Texas border once you get out of Big Bend (maybe near Eagle Pass). But there are regular breaks in the fence so that ranchers can move freely across their land. How is that going to fit into the proposed wall? Will ranchers be forced to divest ranch land?
Cliff Gilley, Technologist, Problem Solver, Product Manager, Lawyer, and all-around fun guy.
Written 13 Nov 2016
As with any legal answer, it depends. This is a long one, so I’ll TL;DR it up here — as far as we know, there is nothing in the Constitution or laws of the US that grant the President such immunity.
First, as to any actions that they take in their official role as President of the United States, they have almost complete immunity from suit except where expressly permitted by law (this is an extension of “sovereign immunity”). When so permitted, they are sued through the office of the President and represented by the Federal lawyers in the Department of Justice.
...
So that leaves us with three possible situations which are entirely unresolved: (1) tortious acts committed while President but unrelated to their authorized legal duties in the office; (2) criminal acts committed but not resolved until after they become President; and (3) criminal acts committed during the Presidency.
...
Its ridiculous to think Obama, or any president, can pardon someone without that person having been convicted first. So there's no "just in case". That is called "immunity" and is not a power enjoyed by the executive branch as far as I am aware.
Absolutely. Indeed, one of the best-known (and controversial) Presidential pardons was Gerald Ford’s preemptive pardon of Richard Nixon. At the time Ford pardoned Nixon, there was no actual prosecution under way, although certainly there was a good chance of one starting soon. Ford’s executive pardon barred any prosecution of Nixon.
However, the President cannot issue a pardon for crimes which had not yet been committed at the time of the pardon.
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Then again we pay for it! Either way WE pay for the stupid wall.
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Orwells Ghost
So then who pays for it? Please enlighten us. New Trump trickle down economics. Please explain how spending $30 billion on a wall will bring in more money in tax revenue from jobs.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Orwells Ghost
a reply to: Aazadan
Except for those American's who now have an actual income thanks to the job creation that will follow. They'll actually be able to purchase more, and pay more taxes, and they'll be purchasing American. Will it hurt at first? Yep. Why is this so hard to understand?
They won't have an income though. Illegals hold jobs that pay minimum wage or less. When there's no more illegals, those jobs will still pay minimum wage because if you increase it, those jobs will be automated away.
The bottom 50% of this country has 0.4% of all the wealth generation. Every unemployed person could be given a minimum wage job today and it would be less than 1/10 of 1% in increased wealth.
If you cannot start at atleast 35k/year (average, in some places that number is as high as 70k) it's not worth working the job. That applies to creating the job as well.
originally posted by: muse7
Do we really want to have a hostile nation on our southern border?
Do we really want to have Chinese military bases in Mexico?
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
a reply to: Aazadan
Just watched Trump on Hannity, he reiterated that The Wall is going to be a real wall, like the wall Israel has, he called it the blueprint for our wall. So far Trump has done what he said he was going to do, if it is at all possible, The Wall will be built, not just a continuation of a worthless fence. Maybe it just won't be possible to build The Wall, but you can be sure Trump will do everything he can to get a real wall built.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: solargeddon
We ARE in a strong position. If we have to pay for the wall, it'll likely be more than compensated by the reduced drain on our economy.
originally posted by: Byrd
I don't know why Trump thought Mexico would come tamely to the table and pay for the wall
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: mzinga
So ya'll Trump supporters still on board? This 20% import tax on Mexican goods to pay for this stupid wall gets paid by who?!?!? Ya'll..
Mexico simply adds 20% to the cost of imported goods.
We pay for it.
Good them we can get rid of Soros and his 13 fund managers 😜
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: burdman30ott6
If Trump fixes the corporate tax codes I'll sing his praises! But in doing so, will eliminate many positions of financial analysts in corporate america.