It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump administration: EPA studies, data must undergo political review before release

page: 2
32
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 25 2017 @ 10:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee
Politicians have to review the science before it can be released to the public?

Is that what it says?


No not "politicians"

"Political Scientists"



Is that better?




posted on Jan, 26 2017 @ 01:24 AM
link   
Political reviews, then that means they won't be non partisan. That's an issue as well as good luck finding reviews and studies that are not non partisan when it comes to these issues as it is.



posted on Jan, 26 2017 @ 02:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Profusion
Trump administration: EPA studies, data must undergo political review before release

Needs to be reviewed and regurgitated by the propaganda arm of government.
All needs to be okayed through the Supreme Leader Donald Jong Un!



posted on Jan, 26 2017 @ 09:00 AM
link   
Peer Review of Science is a hallmark of research, but lets not kid ourselves, the People working in the EPA have an Agenda. The EPA and NOAA have been caught using false data to come to conclusions. There so called "Data" needs to be reviewed.



posted on Jan, 26 2017 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: JBRiddle


There so called "Data" needs to be reviewed.


Hopefully by people who can spell, know science, and know how to read raw data.

[That's what happens in peer review btw.]



edit on 26/1/17 by soficrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2017 @ 01:29 PM
link   
This isn't peer review, which is unbiased and looks for factual errors in publications and quality of work, etc. This is a politician censoring scientific studies based on his political goals.
edit on 26pmThu, 26 Jan 2017 13:29:35 -0600kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2017 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: darkbake

Agreed. And that was my point.




posted on Jan, 26 2017 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: JBRiddle
Peer Review of Science is a hallmark of research, but lets not kid ourselves, the People working in the EPA have an Agenda. The EPA and NOAA have been caught using false data to come to conclusions. There so called "Data" needs to be reviewed.

Sure it does need to be reviewed, however, is the one reviewing it also within an agenda? I believe there was a study(who knows these days= "so-called") that shows a lot of the Peer reviewed papers, let along studies in general are filled with paid for leaning agenda.



new topics

top topics



 
32
<< 1   >>

log in

join