It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
originally posted by: UKTruth
Hopefully this means he is going to kill all the global warming fascism and start opening up the debate.
Time to bury Al Gore!
originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: Blaine91555
It's just an attempt to get the flow of information under control by routing it through a review process, so they know what is going out to the public under the auspices of the government. It's not an attempt to silence science.
You must be under 30.
I fondly remember my own youthful naivete.
Sweet.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: UKTruth
Hopefully this means he is going to kill all the global warming fascism and start opening up the debate.
How is it a debate? I mean, we don't debate gravity, so why is global warming a debate? Serious question.
originally posted by: ofleming
a reply to: soficrow
And? This isn't the first time this has happened
...I love how everyone just knee-jerk reacts to what the media tells them is "craziiiinesss".
Research people, research....
ATS 2005: U.S. Still Silencing Scientists
… "The pressure to alter scientific reports for political reasons has become pervasive at Fish and Wildlife offices around the country," says Lexi Shultz of the Union of Concerned Scientists. According to critics, the Bush administration routinely alters science to suit political objectives.
ATS 2006: Saving Public Access to Scientific Information
The Bush administration's 2007 budget cut the EPA Library Network's budget by 80 percent, and the EPA started shutting down libraries before Congress even approved the budget. Critics say this is another example of the Bush administration restricting public access to scientific information…
[url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1157791/pg1#pid21810314]originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: Profusion
It HAS happened before: peer review replaced by political intervention (links below).
originally posted by: soficrow
Scientists need to talk about their work with their peers, and the public has a right to access research funded by tax money.
originally posted by: soficrow
Moreover, I know where this sort of 'intervention' leads. It's not good. It's not "normal," and it's not benevolent. By a long shot.