It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
did you know the U.S. leases many of our own offshore oil rigs to Saudi Arabia of all places?
originally posted by: attitudeadjustment
a reply to: amazing
The oil is to be processed at refineries in Texas. It does not have to be exported. It can be used by the US.
originally posted by: FamCore
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
This is going to get a lot of use, methinks
And I like it.
My God...
Think she even made it to work this week?
The construction phase, though, is expected to take only one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ a lesser number, primarily for maintenance. The total number of long-term jobs: about 50.
Oh sorry... 50
An employment increase of nearly 33,000 job-years resulting from the direct and the secondary impacts of the spending
The average annual compensation for those jobs will exceed $57,000
About 39% of the jobs will be construction jobs, engineering and architectural services will account for about 6% of that increase, followed by food services, real estate and employment services
The increase in employment will generate a $1.9 Billion increase in labor income
And a nearly $5 Billion increase in production and sales in the region3
Folks are really zeroing in on the small number of people that will be employed by the pipeline itself.
“In the end, this is all a tempest in a teapot,” said Andrew Hoffman, a professor of sustainable enterprise at the University of Michigan. The project, he said, ultimately would not lower prices at the pump or add significantly more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.
So, apparently it's not going to really help nor hinder invested interested in the end. The ones who will continue to suffer are the ones having to deal with it locally.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: dreamingawake
So, apparently it's not going to really help nor hinder invested interested in the end. The ones who will continue to suffer are the ones having to deal with it locally.
Right, there is no danger of warming up the earth from this pipeline.
There are, however, significant economic impacts that will help many.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
You could also have a look at this link:
DAPL Stay Informed
“President Trump is legally required to honor treaty rights and provide a fair and reasonable pipeline process,” Tribal Chairman Dave Archambault said in the statement. “Americans know this pipeline was unfairly rerouted towards our nation and without our consent. The existing pipeline route risks infringing on our treaty rights, contaminating our water and the water of 17 million Americans downstream.”
Electronic monitoring equipment failed to detect a pipeline rupture that spewed more than 176,000 gallons of crude oil into a North Dakota creek, according to the pipeline’s operator, about 150 miles from the site of the Standing Rock protests.
The potential for a pipeline leak that might taint drinking water is at the core of the months-long standoff at the Dakota Access pipeline, where thousands of people have been protesting against its construction. That pipeline would cross the Missouri river.
Yeah, I've read all the counter arguments.